Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA and tax credits advice needed


nks22
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5272 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Up until last July I was self-employed but not earning much so I received working tax credit. In July I stopped work and registered for ESA. I've since had various assessments and have been placed in the work-related category.

 

My tax credits included a disability element and I was (initially) pleased to discover the payments would continue for the first 28 weeks of sickness. It's currently worth £100.97/week.

 

My new income-based ESA entitlement is £89.80/week but because of the WTC I receive nothing. However I do receive £89.90/week as contribution-based ESA.

 

I have put in a claim for mortgage interest - worth £560/month. I just rang up about that and was told I wouldn't be eligible as I received contribution-based rather than income-based ESA (not confirmed - someone is supposed to ring back about that).

 

Also, because of the WTCs I don't qualify for Council Tax Benefit (which would be worth about £20/week).

 

On this basis it looks like my Working Tax Credits are costing me far more than they're worth. Can this be right? If so, can I unilaterally cancel my tax credit claim and so restore my eligibility for the mortgage and council tax relief?

 

(And without WTC would I receive both income-based and contribution-based ESA or would the former simply replace the latter?)

 

I find the whole thing really confusing (including their explanatory letters) so would be very grateful for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have put in a claim for mortgage interest - worth £560/month. I just rang up about that and was told I wouldn't be eligible as I received contribution-based rather than income-based ESA (not confirmed - someone is supposed to ring back about that).

 

This isn't true as you can get both income and contribution based.

 

When your mortgage costs are added after 13 weeks, this will bring you into entitlement to the income based top-up.

 

And your tax credits should end 4 weeks after stopping work, not 28.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't true as you can get both income and contribution based.
So what would I be receiving if I didn't get WTCs? Not both at the same time, surely - i.e. 2 x £89.90?

 

When your mortgage costs are added after 13 weeks, this will bring you into entitlement to the income based top-up.
That seems logical. Even so I still seem to be worse off from receiving WTC with Council Tax.

 

And your tax credits should end 4 weeks after stopping work, not 28.
It's 28 weeks if you stop work because of sickness. (See HM Revenue & Customs: Tax credits when you can't work due to illness )

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contribution based ESA payment rates

During the initial 13 week assessment phase people over the age of 25 will be paid £64.30 per week, people under the age of 25 will receive £50.95 per week.

 

 

Once the assessment phase has been completed you will receive a basic allowance of £64.30 per week plus either a support component of £30.85 per week for those who are placed in the support group or a work related activity component of £25.50 per week for those placed in the work related activity group.

If you are on a low income, you may be able claim income-related ESA as well to increase your allowances. If you meet both the criteria for contribution based and income related Employment and Support Allowance then you will receive whichever is the greater between the ESA (Cont) personal rate and your ESA IR applicable amount

 

Basically this states that you are receiving the correct money at present

£64.30 and the Disabilty Premium of £25.50

You are getting it as contribution based ESA as you have paid enough stamps, but if you hadnt paid enough it could be topped up to this amount by Income Based ESA

But it would never go over your applicable amount, the amount the law says you to live on of £89.90.

You could in theory get both but never more then the above amount

 

If your contributions run out then you would go over to IB ESA and still get £89.90

 

With regards to your tax credits if you are self employed and go on the sick eg ESA then you can claim them for 28 weeks, At the moment they are doing you no harm you are ok becauce you are claiming CB ESA but if you were to go on IB ESA eg your stamp ran out, then they would be classed as an Income and would close your claim so it would be best to cancel them then. But check to see if this is ok because as WTC would be classed as a possible income and you would be claiming a

an Income Based benefit.

 

WTC is stopping you getting CTB but thats no problem as its a lesser amount, Only time to cancel them maybe is when your ESA changes over but they may have run out by then.

 

You will be entitled to help with your mortgage after thirteen weeks

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, that all makes sense. I've just passed the 13-weeks so should now be eligible for the mortgage relief (and my lender has completed and returned the form to the DSS). I believe they can be a bit slow to process claims, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what would I be receiving if I didn't get WTCs? Not both at the same time, surely - i.e. 2 x £89.90?

 

No because the cb-ESA counts as income, so the ib-ESA just tops up the difference.

 

If your housing costs are £560 a month then you will still get a small ib-ESA top up, from £190 income to £219 a week (£89.8 + £129 housing costs). Once you get any ib-ESA you are guaranteed full council tax benefit.

 

(And thanks for the tax credits info, I'll store that in the knowledge bank.)

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If your contributions run out then you would go over to IB ESA and still get £89.90

 

 

Just one comment about your advice, which is good (as always). Unlike JSA, with ESA your contributions don't "run out" after 6 months. If you qualify for cont-based ESA, you will continue to be paid that until you are no longer entitled to the benefit.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Antone, must be like IB

ESA sure is one complicted benefit

 

Yeah, ESA is a sort of hybrid of JSA and IB. We get some of the rules from both, plus some new ones unique to ESA. It can be confusing.

 

Edit to add: The general idea is that if one qualifies for ESA© that will last until the end of the claim. I think that's fair enough: if someone is accepted as being unfit to work, it's not reasonable to expect them to pay NI conts, and credits can't be used to satisfy the FCC.

Edited by antone

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I've just rung up again about my benefit, not having received the promised call-back about my mortgage interest payment. The person I spoke to read out from my records something like "not eligible as excess income due to tax credits". She said she'd again request a call-back so someone can discuss it with me but it leaves me wondering about my tax credits.

 

My initial 13 weeks was up on 18 October since when I expected to be receiving £130/week for mortgage interest. Instead I've been getting £101/week tax credits (which also costs me £18/week in council tax benefit). So it seems that my WTC is losing me £48/week, which surely can't be right, can it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had an exciting update on my benefit. The DSS (or whatever they're now called) are paying my mortgage interest from 21 October. I'll receive £163.28/week (based on their flat rate interest allowance of, I believe, 6.1%) plus my £89.80/week ESA. However from that they'll deduct my WTC income of £95.06/week - leaving a net £158.02/week - give me 10p and send the rest direct to the mortgage company. And I'll now qualify for Council Tax benefit.

 

(I'm not really complaining as I'm a beneficiary of the policy but it does seem a bit odd for the government to pay mortgage interest at a flat rate rather than at the rate an individual is actually paying. My own rate is currently 4.84% and there must be others with much lower rates while a few may be out of pocket and so falling into arrears.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...