Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sinking vs M&S Chargecard


sinking
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4647 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Reading Manxcat's thread, I wonder if I am in the same situation ?

 

I requested a CCA from M&S on the 10th August 2009, and I received a response on 12th September 2009.

 

Can someone take a look and let me know on their validity ?

 

I guess my concerns are :

 

1. There is no signature from M&S on the Application Form (just a date stamp in the signature field) and no date in the Date field.

 

2. The T&C don't appear to match up in size to the application form, it could be they are cropped and incomplete. In fact I am wondering why the T&C's appear a little transparant and you can see the reverse, but you can't see the same from the Application side ?!?!?

 

3. The form clearly states "Application Form", does this mean it can never be an agreement ?

 

4. There is no Credit Limit detailed, only "Credit Limit Request"

 

5. It is a poor photocopy and is of poor quality.

 

 

 

Here are the Scans :

 

Letter

Application Form

Terms on reverse of Application Form

 

 

Many thanks, S.

Edited by sinking
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I would be definitely be questioning this agreement as the orientation doesn't quite fit.

 

If it was the back page of your agreement, the bleed through from the front should be going down the page, not across the top. The Agreement page is in landscape and the T's&C's are in portrait

 

I assume you have scanned and posted the paperwork exactly as you received it.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Silverfox1961,

 

Well, I have replied to them putting it into Dispute for being :

 

1. Not a True Copy of the Executed Credit Agreement

2. Prescribed details missing

3. No Credit Limit detailed, only a request for Credit Limit

 

Lets see what they come back with.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update :

 

As expected I have received a letter from M&S Money stating dated 8th October 2009 :

 

1. M&S Money believes the copy agreement (application form) posted to me is a legally enforcable document. As such they refute all my allegations.

 

2. The application and agreement form are one and the same. The prescribed terms under section 61(1)(a) are included in the documentation provided.

 

3. As such the required documents have been posted, the account is not in dispute, as such normal collections activity will continue.

 

4. Due to the nature of my query, M&S strongly recommend I seek immedidate independent legal advice regarding the validity of my complaint.

 

5. If they do not hear anything in 8 week, they will consider the matter resolved.

 

=================

 

2nd letter dated 10th October 2009 :

 

The Arrangement for reduced payments (I have been paying £1 a month on this for years) has now expired.

 

If I am unable to increase my payment, please provide details of any other balanaces from creditors I have (there are a lot).

 

Please also provide proof of monthly income.

 

This must be received within 10 days of the receipt of this letter (it only arrived on the 17th although the letter is dated 10th!)

 

=====================

 

My questions, other than the usual what do I do next ?

 

1. My copy of the credit agreement, does not have a signature from any M&S representitive, just a date stamp in the signature box. Does this mean the agreement is not signed by the creditor and as such non-enforcable ?

 

2. There is still no credit limit stated, only a request for a credit limit ?

 

3. I sent a formal notification of Dispute, they responded on 9th October refuting this. However they have sent a letter above pushing for payment. Does the letter constitute them pursueing the debt whilst in dispute and as such against the terms of the Consumer Credit Act ?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update :

 

As expected I have received a letter from M&S Money stating dated 8th October 2009 :

 

1. M&S Money believes the copy agreement (application form) posted to me is a legally enforcable document. As such they refute all my allegations.

 

2. The application and agreement form are one and the same. The prescribed terms under section 61(1)(a) are included in the documentation provided.

 

3. As such the required documents have been posted, the account is not in dispute, as such normal collections activity will continue.

 

4. Due to the nature of my query, M&S strongly recommend I seek immedidate independent legal advice regarding the validity of my complaint.

 

5. If they do not hear anything in 8 week, they will consider the matter resolved.

 

=================

 

2nd letter dated 10th October 2009 :

 

The Arrangement for reduced payments (I have been paying £1 a month on this for years) has now expired.

 

If I am unable to increase my payment, please provide details of any other balanaces from creditors I have (there are a lot).

 

Please also provide proof of monthly income.

 

This must be received within 10 days of the receipt of this letter (it only arrived on the 17th although the letter is dated 10th!)

 

=====================

 

My questions, other than the usual what do I do next ?

 

1. My copy of the credit agreement, does not have a signature from any M&S representitive, just a date stamp in the signature box. Does this mean the agreement is not signed by the creditor and as such non-enforcable ?

 

2. There is still no credit limit stated, only a request for a credit limit ?

 

3. I sent a formal notification of Dispute, they responded on 9th October refuting this. However they have sent a letter above pushing for payment. Does the letter constitute them pursueing the debt whilst in dispute and as such against the terms of the Consumer Credit Act ?

 

S.

 

Hello Sinking,

 

Just had a look at your ????agreement they sent you. It is a pre-contractual application form, from 1995.

 

Did they upgrade your store card account to the &more credit card account in 2003. If they did where is the agreement for that one????;)

 

I have had the template letter to increase payments (wasnt making them any:confused:) and we want your income and expenditure. I did write to them regarding the disputed account and told them very very nicely, that I would not concede to their request. Bascially bog off and give me my credit agreement :D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how sad I am. I woke up this morning thinking of this thread:|

 

Have a (long) read of this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

 

Going back to your "agreement" If the back was part of the original agreement then when you filled in the front, the whole left hand side would be missing.

 

Have you thought about sending M&S a SAR. I think this would get them to reveal their hand.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Well,

 

This was part of a whole batch of loans / cards / etc...., I wrote to them all and some could not provide the details of the loans, where as others could provide the agreements, but it was all a mess.

 

In the end I tried to negotiate with all of them, offering 20p in the pound to clear the debts, otherwise my partner would go bankrupt, they all flatly refused to negotiate and subsequently she went bankrupt. She has now passed out of bankruptcy where none of the debts were repaid and no money was recovered by the Insolvency service.

 

About M&S, they were one of the most difficult to deal with and argued that they wanted full repayment, but as my partner went bankrupt, it never got that far.

 

Thanks to all those who helped, and as my partner was on a low income with tax credits and children in a council house, going bankrupt was the best thing she ever did.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...