Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS CCA Valid or not? Please help


JC99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

have been following the site for a while and using all the great advice to send CCA's to RBS and MBNA(seperate thread). On requesting the CCA from RBS with the standard letter template and hearing nothing I sent 2 subsequent letters declaring the account in dispute. I then received a letter and documents as attached RBS let 1 1 to RBS let 1 10(attached). After several phone calls were I declared the account in dispute i then received letter 2 (RBS let 2 1 and RBS let 2 2 attached).

From the first letter received is it correct that the account is not in dispute and from the second letter what would now be my next course of action.

I greatly appreciate any advice anyone can give,

 

many thanks

JC99

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

have been following the site for a while and using all the great advice to send CCA's to RBS and MBNA(seperate thread). On requesting the CCA from RBS with the standard letter template and hearing nothing I sent 2 subsequent letters declaring the account in dispute. I then received a letter and documents as attached RBS let 1 1 to RBS let 1 10(attached). After several phone calls were I declared the account in dispute i then received letter 2 (RBS let 2 1 and RBS let 2 2 attached).

From the first letter received is it correct that the account is not in dispute and from the second letter what would now be my next course of action.

I greatly appreciate any advice anyone can give,

 

many thanks

JC99

 

Could you scan and post the agreements?

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the docs scanned but am having trouble attaching( Iam new to this), I am doing something obviously wrong but cannot see it - any ideas

thanks

 

 

You could download your docs to photobucket, then copy and paste on to this thread.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a photobucket how to I stole :D

 

It seems tricky at first, but is fairly simple really.

 

1, Scan your DCA letter/whatever you want to show on the forum.

Ideal setting is 100dpi as it's closest to computer monitor display resolution.

 

2, Save the scanned image as a jpeg

Step 2.5 Edit out any personal information, barcodes or any other comments, notes or markings around the edge of the document. Never change the original document you received

2.5, Load the saved image into MS Paint. (comes free with Windows.) Use the pain brush or spray can to remove/paint over any personal info, such as name, account number, address, etc. Also remove any barcodes, as some DCAs may be able to identify you from these.

 

3, Create an account on Photobucket.

 

4, Once you have a Photobucket account, you'll find on the main webpage little box where you can upload photos. Click the "upload image" box and then tell it where on your hard disk you saved your scanned jpeg. It will then upload the image to Photobucket and it will show you thumbnails of the images you have uploaded. Under each image there are links that you can copy and paste.

 

5, Copy the IMG link below the image you want to put on the forum. Then reply to thread on CAG. Right click with the mouse and select "paste" from the little menu that pops up.

 

6, You'll then get some text appear in your message that looks a bit like this.

 

imagename.jpg{\IMG

 

When you submit the reply, the text will change into the image you uploaded onto photobucket. The text you copied and pasted is just the information the forum needs, so it knows where to find your photo and display it in your message.

 

 

Courtesy of Fuzzybobble

  • Haha 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul, Silverfox

 

many thanks for the fast responses. Hopefully the images below show the CCA info received from RBS. Do you think this complies or do I still have a case? I am getting texts now saying I must ring them immediately. Hope someone can help/advise.

 

RBSlet11.jpg

RBSlet12.jpg

RBSlet13.jpg

RBSlet14.jpg

RBSlet15.jpg

RBSlet16.jpg

RBSlet17.jpg

RBSlet18.jpg

 

RBSlet110.jpg

RBSlet22.jpgIMG]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul, Silverfox

 

many thanks for the fast responses. Hopefully the images below show the CCA info received from RBS. Do you think this complies or do I still have a case? I am getting texts now saying I must ring them immediately. Hope someone can help/advise.

What should my next course of action be now?

RBSlet11.jpg

RBSlet12.jpg

RBSlet13.jpg

RBSlet14.jpg

RBSlet15.jpg

RBSlet16.jpg

RBSlet17.jpg

RBSlet18.jpg

 

RBSlet110.jpg

RBSlet22.jpgIMG]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems they have just sent generic copies of agreements and so are still in default of your request. I would send them something like this - AMEND TO SUIT:

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Re Account: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx and my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx 2009, the contents of which are noted.

 

Your attention is drawn to the fact that this account is subject to a serious dispute. On xx 2009 I requested that you supply me with a copy of the original signed credit agreement covering this account pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 78. Your response to me on the xx has failed to comply with my request. Without production of the alleged agreement I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable for any alleged debt to xx, nor does it give me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’ as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

For the avoidance of any doubt I have included section 78(1) and 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, which states…

 

78 Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of [£1], shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a) the state of the account, and

(b) the amount, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

© the amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

Clearly as no agreement was supplied on request, this in no way complies with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and I now draw your attention to section 78 subsection 6 which states If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Clearly this is a situation as described in S.78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the debt is unenforceable at this time. In addition, I draw your attention to section 127 (3) Consumer Credit Act 1974 which states:

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the consumer credit act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

To clarify S.61(1) states:

 

(1)A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless:

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms, and

© The document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible.

 

In addition the prescribed terms referred to in section 60 CCA1974 are contained in schedule 6 column 2 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) and are inter alia: - A term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit, A term stating the rate of any interest on the credit to be provided under the agreement and A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following :-

 

1.Number of repayments;

2.Amount of repayments;

3.Frequency and timing of repayments;

4.Dates of repayments;

5.The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

 

Therefore based upon the Consumer Credit Act 1974 this debt as it stands is unenforceable and should this proceed to litigation, a court is precluded from making an enforcement order under section 127(3) unless a true copy of the signed agreement is produced.

 

At the point where this account entered into the default situation as described in s78 (6) CCA 1974 no other charges are allowed to be added until such time as xx become compliant with my request. As xx are still not in compliance with my request I insist that the following takes place with immediate effect:

 

All entries which refer to missed payments be removed from my credit file.

All collection activities cease with immediate effect until CitiFinancial comply with my request from date xx 2009.

 

In addition, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on Debt Collection:

 

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I have enclosed an excerpt from page 5 of the guidance which states:

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment.

 

What I Require:

I require that you send me a true copy of the executed agreement as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. If you are unable to supply the requested documentation because no such agreement is in existence I require written clarification as such. May I respectfully suggest that in the obvious absence of a legally binding agreement as outlined above, that the balance on this account be returned to zero, and all liabilities discharged and any entries which refer to missing payments be removed from Credit Reference Agencies to whom you report.

I require that you comply with my request within 14 days of the date of this letter. I will not correspond any further with you until I either receive a copy of the requested documents as laid down in section 78(1) CCA 74 or clarification that such agreement doesn’t exist. I am advised that should you persist in pursuing this debt ignoring the above information you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well.

No other correspondence will be accepted.

Should you attempt litigation it will be vigorously defended and the failure to supply documentation under the CCA 1974 is a complete defence to any legal action and your actions will be vexatious and unlawful.

I trust this out lines the situation.

 

Yours faithfully,

JC99

 

 

............................................

Please, if you use this letter be carefull to edit accordingly - there is nothing so amateur as to leave xx's in - its a bit of a give away.

Someone more experienced may want to confirm this is the right type of letter to use in the circumstances.

Best of luck!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

All,

 

Have received the following from RBS and have checked my credit rating which is now in tatters. I really don't know what to do next, do i arrange to pay them or am I still on the right track?

Any help is much appreciated.

On another claim with MBNA they told me today that s78 is no longer valid - is this correct.?

Thanks

 

Document-1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...