Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tesco Direct order cancelled after payment taken ?


joolzmc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have fortunately not found myself in this position before and help would be much appreciated.

 

I placed an order with Tesco Direct ( a pre-order for windows 7 ) on 12th September and the funds were duly taken from my account on that day, since then I have had to cancel my debit card which I did yesterday ( 19th) I did not see any problem with this as I thought everything was in order until a phone call a couple of hours ago from Tescos.

 

I was advised that my order had been cancelled as they had been advised my debit card had been cancelled. I confirmed my debit card had been cancelled on the 19th but this was 7 days after I had made a purchase from them. I was told that as my card had been cancelled there was no choice but to cancel my order and I could no longer re-place my order as the price had now increased by nearly £100. I was advised by the guy that I spoke to that no discretion could be taken ( whatever he was talking about )

 

I thought that by Tesco taking my money we had entered into a contract:???:. My order was cancelled by them some 8 days after this contract was entered into... the reason being my debit card was cancelled yesterday, I pointed this out but was advised that as I had not recieved my goods they were entitled to do this :???:

 

Please can someone let me know where I stand as I am currently waiting for a supervisor to call me back and I would like to have the correct information. Has a contract been formed beween myself and Tesco and should I push further for them to fulfill my order that they have cancelled even though they are aware that my transaction was legitimate ?

 

The funny thing is I placed an order with tesco books on the 19th September I haven't received that yet but that order is ok !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Can you confirm that the money was actually taken from your account, IMHO most on-line retailers will debit your account on dispatch of the goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you confirm that the money was actually taken from your account, IMHO most on-line retailers will debit your account on dispatch of the goods.

 

Yes Tescos most definately took the payment from my account the day the order was placed ( 12th ), they have had the money as they have refunded me ( 20th ) card cancelled 19th . Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

You are not the only one. I ordered a laptop from tesco direct on 12th july, they called me two days after saying exactly the same. That it was a mistake and I had to pay 100 pounds more. After explainng uk laws about online shopping they said they would send it. I called them on 17th july and they promised it would be delivered by yesterday. Still waiting. I just sent them an email to see what they say about this.

I am almost certain I will not see the laptop unless I pay 100 more. They will keep on telling me to wait for the dispatch until I cancel the order or pay.

Disgusting attitude!

I am joining the groups of people against tesco.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a reply to my email. They decided without my consent, to refund the money. We´ll see if at least that is true.

Can I do something productive against them? Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My circumstances were slighty different. ( cannot establish if your card was cancelled prior to dispatch or it was a misprice Tesco have just not honoured )

 

I had taken advantage of a special offer price which was a valid offer and not a misprice, the money was taken but the item was on pre-order so was not being dispatched immediately, the period from when I paid Tesco prior to dispatch I cancelled my card, Tesco .'. assumed it was a fraudulent transaction. I tried to expain that it wasn't however I was automatically refunded and told I could rebuy at the new increased price.

 

In the end I did get it sorted but this was due to the fact that is was a genuine offer ( not a misprice ) and Tesco's using it's vigilence believing my card had been stolen, they therefore agreed to resell at the original price once they fully established the circumstances and realising that it was not a fraudulent transaction.

 

I did check with consumer direct and apparently for online sales and according to Tesco's T&C's a contract is not formed until item is dispatched, the earmarking or taking of the funds does not constitute a contract in these circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and even more news!

Tesco direct has called me to lie to me!!!!

they were saying that the reason why my order was cancelled is because the courier did not find the address and he gave me a call. Apparently, in this call, I told them I did not know anything about any tesco order. (Can this argument be any more ridiculous?)

Not only I did not get a call from them the day they claim to have called me, I do not have any call at all that day.

And unable to find the address? A lot of things I buy online are delivered to the same place with no problem whatsoever.

It´s outrageous.

The answer from tesco is of course, you need to place a new order (100 pounds more)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and even more news!

Tesco direct has called me to lie to me!!!!

they were saying that the reason why my order was cancelled is because the courier did not find the address and he gave me a call. Apparently, in this call, I told them I did not know anything about any tesco order. (Can this argument be any more ridiculous?)

Not only I did not get a call from them the day they claim to have called me, I do not have any call at all that day.

And unable to find the address? A lot of things I buy online are delivered to the same place with no problem whatsoever.

It´s outrageous.

The answer from tesco is of course, you need to place a new order (100 pounds more)

 

Perhaps the courier misdialled ? and that is why you have not spoken to anyone and the person they did speak to was obviously not aware of any order iykwim.

 

I would email them setting out all the facts and deal with one person in order to get it sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...