Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

mel v mint and tesco


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6443 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have put the two together as one thread as they are the same bank and i have sent the two separate prelim letters to the same address anyway.

so now i wait.................

Halifax 13/7/06 sent data protection act letter

26/7/06 recieved statements

1/8/06 posted prelim letter, recieved acknowledgment 5/8/06

14/8/06 sent lba

18/8/06 offered £150 NOT A CHANCE

30/8/06 sent rejection letter to halifax

15/9/06 offered £450 no chance

15/9/06 filed court claim!!!

17/9/06 deemed served

21/9/06 letter settling **WON**

NatWest 1/8/06 rang for statements

2/9/06 got some statements

14/9/06 finally got rest of statements

30/11/06 prelim letter sent

14/12/06 lba sent

tesco 2/8/06 prelim sent ,

9/8/06 acknowledged ,

18/8/06 go away letter recieved

mint prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 9/8/06

cap 1 prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 18/08/006

7/9/06 offered £272 NOPE

10/10/06 filed claim

26/10/06 letter settling **WON**

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi fokes, looked the blog and links cant find address . for subject access requst to be sent to ,,, bank of scotland,mbna city cards captal one can any one help please...hugh52

Link to post
Share on other sites

i just sent them to the addresses at the top of the statments. alternativly, if you look on each of the bank pages on this site it has the contacts as stickys

Halifax 13/7/06 sent data protection act letter

26/7/06 recieved statements

1/8/06 posted prelim letter, recieved acknowledgment 5/8/06

14/8/06 sent lba

18/8/06 offered £150 NOT A CHANCE

30/8/06 sent rejection letter to halifax

15/9/06 offered £450 no chance

15/9/06 filed court claim!!!

17/9/06 deemed served

21/9/06 letter settling **WON**

NatWest 1/8/06 rang for statements

2/9/06 got some statements

14/9/06 finally got rest of statements

30/11/06 prelim letter sent

14/12/06 lba sent

tesco 2/8/06 prelim sent ,

9/8/06 acknowledged ,

18/8/06 go away letter recieved

mint prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 9/8/06

cap 1 prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 18/08/006

7/9/06 offered £272 NOPE

10/10/06 filed claim

26/10/06 letter settling **WON**

Link to post
Share on other sites

well today i got the "sorry not happy, have a leaflet, get back to you sometime" letter. funny thing is, both written and signed by the same woman Amanda Hickman.

guess who is going to get the lba letters in one weeks time?:lol:

i'm not very patient at this waiting game tho.

Halifax 13/7/06 sent data protection act letter

26/7/06 recieved statements

1/8/06 posted prelim letter, recieved acknowledgment 5/8/06

14/8/06 sent lba

18/8/06 offered £150 NOT A CHANCE

30/8/06 sent rejection letter to halifax

15/9/06 offered £450 no chance

15/9/06 filed court claim!!!

17/9/06 deemed served

21/9/06 letter settling **WON**

NatWest 1/8/06 rang for statements

2/9/06 got some statements

14/9/06 finally got rest of statements

30/11/06 prelim letter sent

14/12/06 lba sent

tesco 2/8/06 prelim sent ,

9/8/06 acknowledged ,

18/8/06 go away letter recieved

mint prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 9/8/06

cap 1 prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 18/08/006

7/9/06 offered £272 NOPE

10/10/06 filed claim

26/10/06 letter settling **WON**

Link to post
Share on other sites

both written and signed by the same woman Amanda Hickman...........................

guess who is going to get the lba letters in one weeks time?:lol:

quote]

 

Just sent my LBA to Amanda Hickman!!! Busy lady!!! lol ;)

FIRST DIRECT: £4751.86 SETTLED IN FULL 5/07/06 :-)

 

TESCO VISA CARD: £90 SETTLED IN FULL 12/08/06 :)

 

LLOYDS TSB: £4403.59 SETTLED IN FULL 17/08/06 :)

EGG: £451.52 SETTLED IN FULL 18/01/07 :)

 

 

Opinions and advice of kazzaw are independent, offered informally, without prejudice, without liability, and not endorsed by the Bank Action Group. If in any doubt, seek the advice of a qualified, insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops just rechecked the letters that i have on file that i sent to mint and tesco and i have just noticed that they are the lba letters. this means that i didnt ever send the prelim ones.

not sure what i do now. do i let them have the 28 days they would have had if i had got it right or the carry on with the 14 days (tomorrow)and just put in a moneyclaim straight away?

Halifax 13/7/06 sent data protection act letter

26/7/06 recieved statements

1/8/06 posted prelim letter, recieved acknowledgment 5/8/06

14/8/06 sent lba

18/8/06 offered £150 NOT A CHANCE

30/8/06 sent rejection letter to halifax

15/9/06 offered £450 no chance

15/9/06 filed court claim!!!

17/9/06 deemed served

21/9/06 letter settling **WON**

NatWest 1/8/06 rang for statements

2/9/06 got some statements

14/9/06 finally got rest of statements

30/11/06 prelim letter sent

14/12/06 lba sent

tesco 2/8/06 prelim sent ,

9/8/06 acknowledged ,

18/8/06 go away letter recieved

mint prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 9/8/06

cap 1 prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 18/08/006

7/9/06 offered £272 NOPE

10/10/06 filed claim

26/10/06 letter settling **WON**

Link to post
Share on other sites

need some advice please

Halifax 13/7/06 sent data protection act letter

26/7/06 recieved statements

1/8/06 posted prelim letter, recieved acknowledgment 5/8/06

14/8/06 sent lba

18/8/06 offered £150 NOT A CHANCE

30/8/06 sent rejection letter to halifax

15/9/06 offered £450 no chance

15/9/06 filed court claim!!!

17/9/06 deemed served

21/9/06 letter settling **WON**

NatWest 1/8/06 rang for statements

2/9/06 got some statements

14/9/06 finally got rest of statements

30/11/06 prelim letter sent

14/12/06 lba sent

tesco 2/8/06 prelim sent ,

9/8/06 acknowledged ,

18/8/06 go away letter recieved

mint prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 9/8/06

cap 1 prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 18/08/006

7/9/06 offered £272 NOPE

10/10/06 filed claim

26/10/06 letter settling **WON**

Link to post
Share on other sites

edted

Telewest v RBS

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/61214-telewest-rbs.html[/url]

Telewest v A&L

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester/61215-telwest-l.html[/url]

Telewest v Halifax

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/63775-telewest-halifax.html[/url]

 

If I've helped - hit the scales and rate me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

well got a letter from tesco totally denying all responsibility for anything so off to court i need to go, bad news is that i have to wait for payday before i can afford it.

is asking for the defaults to be removed going to be a problem? as the letter says that it wont remove it until the account is cleared, which is going to be a while as i can only afford £10 a month.

any advise please............

Halifax 13/7/06 sent data protection act letter

26/7/06 recieved statements

1/8/06 posted prelim letter, recieved acknowledgment 5/8/06

14/8/06 sent lba

18/8/06 offered £150 NOT A CHANCE

30/8/06 sent rejection letter to halifax

15/9/06 offered £450 no chance

15/9/06 filed court claim!!!

17/9/06 deemed served

21/9/06 letter settling **WON**

NatWest 1/8/06 rang for statements

2/9/06 got some statements

14/9/06 finally got rest of statements

30/11/06 prelim letter sent

14/12/06 lba sent

tesco 2/8/06 prelim sent ,

9/8/06 acknowledged ,

18/8/06 go away letter recieved

mint prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 9/8/06

cap 1 prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 18/08/006

7/9/06 offered £272 NOPE

10/10/06 filed claim

26/10/06 letter settling **WON**

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there anyone who can give me advise on the default problem. the letter is very much in jargon, but it seems to say it was my own fault and i was warned if i couldnt meet the contractual obligations i would be defaulted.

Halifax 13/7/06 sent data protection act letter

26/7/06 recieved statements

1/8/06 posted prelim letter, recieved acknowledgment 5/8/06

14/8/06 sent lba

18/8/06 offered £150 NOT A CHANCE

30/8/06 sent rejection letter to halifax

15/9/06 offered £450 no chance

15/9/06 filed court claim!!!

17/9/06 deemed served

21/9/06 letter settling **WON**

NatWest 1/8/06 rang for statements

2/9/06 got some statements

14/9/06 finally got rest of statements

30/11/06 prelim letter sent

14/12/06 lba sent

tesco 2/8/06 prelim sent ,

9/8/06 acknowledged ,

18/8/06 go away letter recieved

mint prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 9/8/06

cap 1 prelim sent 2/8/06, acknowledged 18/08/006

7/9/06 offered £272 NOPE

10/10/06 filed claim

26/10/06 letter settling **WON**

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to let you know before they put a default, they never do, it goes straight automatically when they don't received the money or they don't put the money on time in your account.

 

Normal CSA are not able to remove the default, you'll have to send letter to Customer Relations, ans threaten to take them to court and as I read in other post around here, in make bad publicity in the press.

 

You can also contact in writting the credit agency where you deault is and advising them of disputing that mark. So future lenders are aware of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...