Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bank charges from benefits


bsj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5371 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I want to help a very dear friend claim her charges back from her bank,the total at the moment stands at £89 in charges.

I have printed off the hardship letter template and the income and expenditure spreadsheet.

Having not done this before i could do with a little advice before i embark on this mission.I don't want to get anything wrong.

The charges have been taken from her child benefit,but she is also on JSA,after her and her husband lost their jobs earlier this year.

It's alot of money for them to lose under the circumstances.

Edited by bsj
Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to help a very dear friend claim her charges back from her bank,the total at the moment stands at £89 in charges.

I have printed off the hardship letter template and the income and expenditure spreadsheet.

Having not done this before i could do with a little advice before i embark on this mission.I don't want to get anything wrong.

The charges have been taken from her child benefit,but she is also on JSA,after her and her husband lost their jobs earlier this year.

It's alot of money for them to lose under the circumstances.

 

If you come back I can advise. Please come back and tell us which bank

  • Haha 1

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you come back I can advise. Please come back and tell us which bank

 

 

Hi yourbank,it's the abby national,they have an awful attitude in the bank.

 

I went in with my friend to speak to them,i took a copy of the right of appropriation with us,they just did'nt care that were actually taking money that would feed her child.

 

We did go to the CAB and they informed the bank should not be taking these charges.

 

I would be very grateful for any help.

 

I have given her the spreadsheet for income and expenditure to fill in,while i waited for some advice here,she also has the template letter so it's ready to go.

 

I just don't want to make a mistake any get anything wrong on her behalf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yourbank,it's the abby national,they have an awful attitude in the bank.

 

I went in with my friend to speak to them,i took a copy of the right of appropriation with us,they just did'nt care that were actually taking money that would feed her child.

 

We did go to the CAB and they informed the bank should not be taking these charges.

 

I would be very grateful for any help.

 

I have given her the spreadsheet for income and expenditure to fill in,while i waited for some advice here,she also has the template letter so it's ready to go.

 

I just don't want to make a mistake any get anything wrong on her behalf.

 

Ok firstly we need to take a step back first but you are very prepared, which is good.

Has the account been opened since 2001?

Are these the first charges you have incurred on the account?

The problem I have is that if the charges are merely £89 then it isn't a financial hardship claim to be honest.

However the bank should refuse to allow you to take some of the benefit from the amount even if the account was overdrawn because of the "treating customers fairly" which the FSA has instilled into the banks. In fact, I have it on good authority that the FOS would not look too kindly at the fact that they effectively said, you cannot have even 1p of the money.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok firstly we need to take a step back first but you are very prepared, which is good.

Has the account been opened since 2001?

Are these the first charges you have incurred on the account?

The problem I have is that if the charges are merely £89 then it isn't a financial hardship claim to be honest.

However the bank should refuse to allow you to take some of the benefit from the amount even if the account was overdrawn because of the "treating customers fairly" which the FSA has instilled into the banks. In fact, I have it on good authority that the FOS would not look too kindly at the fact that they effectively said, you cannot have even 1p of the money.

 

Thank you,it's the reason i came to ask for help,i don't want to run before i can walk.

 

The account was opened pre 2001.

Charges were incurred on the account for an returned DD in January.

The bank did send a letter telling her they would waive the charge as it was her first.

The second charge was the same circumstance but because they waived the charge in Jan they were not prepared to do waive this one.

She has stopped using the account and has opened a post office account to have her benefits paid.

There is no authorised overdraft on the account.

Doe's it have to be above a certain amount to be able to claim the monies back?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you,it's the reason i came to ask for help,i don't want to run before i can walk.

 

The account was opened pre 2001.

Charges were incurred on the account for an returned DD in January.

The bank did send a letter telling her they would waive the charge as it was her first.

The second charge was the same circumstance but because they waived the charge in Jan they were not prepared to do waive this one.

She has stopped using the account and has opened a post office account to have her benefits paid.

There is no authorised overdraft on the account.

Doe's it have to be above a certain amount to be able to claim the monies back?.

She can claim bank charges at any time but the case is not a financial hardship case since even by a definition within the FSA Waiver Annex 2 it states that £500.00 over a 12 month period could be indicative of financial hardship. From post 1 it isn't but if she gets the first letter in then her claim is acknowledged and will be settled on the conclusion of the OFT test case.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

She can claim bank charges at any time but the case is not a financial hardship case since even by a definition within the FSA Waiver Annex 2 it states that £500.00 over a 12 month period could be indicative of financial hardship. From post 1 it isn't but if she gets the first letter in then her claim is acknowledged and will be settled on the conclusion of the OFT test case.

 

Thank you,Well i guess we'll put in the claim for the charges and at least she'll be in the queue so to speak.

The outcome of the bank charge case won't be known untill october,is that correct?

The above info is very interesting i'm grateful to you for providing it.

Something else i learnt today,and we all know what they say about a little knowledge;).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you,Well i guess we'll put in the claim for the charges and at least she'll be in the queue so to speak.

The outcome of the bank charge case won't be known untill october,is that correct?

The above info is very interesting i'm grateful to you for providing it.

Something else i learnt today,and we all know what they say about a little knowledge;).

The current part of the law case is about whether the charges can be assessed for fairness and not if the charges terms themselves are fair so we are nearly 50% through.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...