Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS ... c/o DSAR Request problem/delay?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

RBS ... c/o DSAR Request problem/delay?

 

 

Hi, I have put in a c/o DSAR request (with standard Letters of Authority to accompany the letter) on 2 accounts and received a response from an Edinburgh address (Customer Response Services Unit)

 

They say ...

 

"We have received 2 requests from you seeking transaction lists under the Data Protection Acts (1998) on the above mentioned customer.

 

As you have no signing authority on this account er cannot complete your requests, however if the account holder writes to us regarding the charges on their account we shall look at it on their behalf. Alternatively you can contact your local branch who will advise you what steps are required for you to be a signatory on the account.

 

Once the changes have been made to the account please send a letter to us at the address in this letter where we will deal with the claim accordingly."

 

 

So are these delay tactics? I have sent out exactly the same requests to other banks without this type of response??

 

Please help & advise ... Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be that if the two letters were detached that it wasn't not picked up. I think you may need to put the authority for you to act something on the bottom stating, "please see additional page" or words to that effect.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be that if the two letters were detached that it wasn't not picked up. I think you may need to put the authority for you to act something on the bottom stating, "please see additional page" or words to that effect.

 

I stapled the whole story together (i.e. DSAR request & LOA), but i will include the wordage ... RBS have sent back the 2 cheques but not my original letters. However on their letter they have quoted ref numbers, so one thinks why the a delay? They have everything they need!

Edited by papadak
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been trying to get my SAR and 2 CCA's from RBS for 3 years. I have paid 4 times. I think they don't want to send me the CCA's because then I will be able to claim for two instances of mis-sold PPI's (£5,500 worth) I also think they don't want me to see what has been going on with my account at Telford. There seem to be a number of account numbers they are using to refer to my account. I do have copies of my original loan agreements though which clearly show the amounts of PPI. I was sold the second one, without my realising it, while the first one was still current and being paid for. There seem to be a few people on this site to whom rbs will not send the information they have requested. I wonder why?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...