Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Loan Agreement Rbs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Took out a loan for 25k in Aug 2005, never missed a payment but at the end of 2008 I decided to do a overhaul of my finances and contacted the RBS for a copy of my C/A, constantly fobbed off then in Feb started sending everything in writing and recorded delivery, eventually told this had been mis filed and sorry for any inconveinence, I have since learned alos that they have added £4114 in PPI.

I have done all the template letters but still nothing, I have sent off a SAR request, I have gave them more than enough notice, but they are still hoping I go away.

I have tried cancelling my Direct Debit but because I bank with them they will not allow me to cancel this.

 

Any suggestions!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they take part in the direct debit scheme then:

 

The direct debit guarantee applies to all banks and building societies taking part in the direct debit scheme. It says that:

 

Customers can cancel a direct debit at any time by writing to their bank or building society.

 

So send a letter demanding the direct debit be cancelled. I am presuming they have to follow the DD Guarantee regardless. I can't find any clauses in this guarantee that says certain DD's CAN'T be cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Can someone look at a letter I received from RBS regarding a SAR request as I am at a loss to what it means:

 

"Unfortunatley in this instance, documentation for this said loan cannot be provided.

For the Data Protection Act to apply, information which is not stored electronically needs to be held in a certain structured format which is easily accesible. An example of this would be if information was filed in alphabetical order, referring to the name of the customer and then the file itself was broken down into different topics. Information held in such a structured format is known as a Relevant Filing Sysytem.

Part of your SAR, the CCA would not generally be held by the bank in a relevant filing system and as such would fall out with the scope of the Act-this would mean that you would not be entitled to it under the Data Protection Act".

 

Any ideas to what this means or are they trying to blind me with science, I have been chasing my C/A since Nov 08.

 

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes I sent a CCA in Feb 09, but they have said it has been misfiled, also requested that they cancel the Direct Debit for this loan as it is now in dispute but they still continue to take the money, have sent many letter but continue to get the same reply, that they have misfiled and when I sent a SARN request they eventually sent me the above reply which just appears to be nonsense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I sent a CCA in Feb 09, but they have said it has been misfiled, also requested that they cancel the Direct Debit for this loan as it is now in dispute but they still continue to take the money, have sent many letter but continue to get the same reply, that they have misfiled and when I sent a SARN request they eventually sent me the above reply which just appears to be nonsense.

 

The agreement is unenforceable whilst they are in default.

 

You need to change banks.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...