Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBOS Have Replied to LBA Letter...Help?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6479 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

I have just received a response from my LBA letter to the RBOS, which reads:

 

"I apologise for any dissatisfaction caused by the application of charges to your account. However, we believe that our charges are fair, reasonable and transparent. We consider that the amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with us and our published tariff which, we are satisfied, complies with all applicable laws and regulations. We are also committed to ensuring the transparency of the information that we give to our customers about the operation of our products.

 

However, if you disagree, please let us know the date(s) and amount(s) of any particular items that you dispute. We will be pleased to reinvestigate. . Unless we hear from you in this regard, the charges debited to your account must stand.

 

It is diappointing to note that you are considering legal action against the bank. Whilst I hope you will feel able to reconsider, should you decide to go ahead, please ensure that any Proceedings are served on our Registered Office address, which appears at the foot of this letter. Blah, blah, blah..."

 

They are asking me to serve the papers to an office in Edinburgh when my account was opened in England, is this correct? I still haven't received full statements from them yet and am only claiming up to when I stopped using the account in 2003!

 

Any advice would be most appreciated.

 

Best wishes

 

Milly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All

 

I have just received a response from my LBA letter to the RBOS, which reads:

 

"I apologise for any dissatisfaction caused by the application of charges to your account. However, we believe that our charges are fair, reasonable and transparent. We consider that the amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with us and our published tariff which, we are satisfied, complies with all applicable laws and regulations. We are also committed to ensuring the transparency of the information that we give to our customers about the operation of our products.

 

However, if you disagree, please let us know the date(s) and amount(s) of any particular items that you dispute. We will be pleased to reinvestigate. . Unless we hear from you in this regard, the charges debited to your account must stand.

 

It is diappointing to note that you are considering legal action against the bank. Whilst I hope you will feel able to reconsider, should you decide to go ahead, please ensure that any Proceedings are served on our Registered Office address, which appears at the foot of this letter. Blah, blah, blah..."

 

They are asking me to serve the papers to an office in Edinburgh when my account was opened in England, is this correct? I still haven't received full statements from them yet and am only claiming up to when I stopped using the account in 2003!

 

Any advice would be most appreciated.

 

Best wishes

 

Milly

Don't worry, it's a standard letter.

 

Respond

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Penalty Charges -

 

I refer to your letter of .

 

I would advise you that I have already furnished you with the list of charges that I dispute. I have also made it abundantly clear that your charges are unlawful.

 

I note your request that I serve papers on your head office in Edinburgh. However, I would refer you to Rule 6.5(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules - should you wish to give an address for service you must give an address within the Jurisidiction of England and Wales - the Jurisidiction I intend to raise this action in.

 

Nevertheless, should you not refund the charges to my account within the next 14 days I will raise an action against you in my local County Court. Such an action will include also seek an award for interest and compensation for invonvenience caused.

 

Yours faithfully

NOTE: I would claim contractual interest at this stage

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...