Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The new Homeowner Mortgage Support Scheme is now launched, great news for those with a temporary loss of income.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3131 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

That's great news! hope everything goes well for you now :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...

hi guys im getting all jump because since everyone has been round i havent a thing i have called the housing assocaition to ask whats happening do you think it too soon? I mean its been over a month so the lady i need to speak to is not in and will call me back later, what if they dont give me a offer? the repairs they said need doing are rather minor im not getting a new bathroom and kitchen just the fence needs replacing and the guttering. is there no-one out there going throughthis? Maybe it wont be completed now until after christmas now how long does it take to complete normally anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help me? I'm new to this site and don't know if I'm doing this correctly. Forgive me if I'm not.

We took out a mortgage with Capston Mortgage Services (SPML) and although their interest rates were punitive we didn't have a problem with repayments initially. However, my husband had a couple of heart attack back in 2004 and we fell into arrears which, with all the costs incurred, amounted to £7000. We were taken to court and given a suspended repossession order an started to pay off the arears at £150 per month. This continued until 3 months ago when we found ourselves once more unable to make the payments (mortgage and arears). My husband is self employed and his main client went into liquidation earlier this year. We had managed to continue paying from savings until recently and we informed our MP that we were really struggling. We had earlier asked to be put on an interest only mortgage but were told that it wasn't possible. When I spoke to them I told them that my husband was about to re-start work for his client but we were waiting for them to sort out terms first. We are still waiting. The person I spoke to there appeared very understanding and said he would request that our account and situation be looked at by another department who might be able to help us. 3 weeks passed and we heard nothing so I rang them. The lady I spoke to said that there was nothing they could do to help. When I asked why, she didn't respond but suggested we take out a loan or got a family member to pay the shortfall on our account which was approximately £4,000, otherwise we would lose our home. My husband has secured some work, which will cover our mortgage and our agreed payment towards arrears at the end of this month, and he has applied for several lectureships and other less well-paid jobs too. I spoke to someone at the MP again today and I was told to see someone at the CAB as soon as possible and to also apply for any benefits we might be entitled to. He also suggested asking someone in the family to help. I am a full-time foster carer and earn about £160 per week and when I rang the benefits agency I was told I earned too much to entitle us to any benefits. I have now been told by a friend who works for the DWP that that is incorrect. This will also be looked into when we are at the CAB on Friday. Now to my question...

I have been told that because we have a suspended possession order the MP can simply apply for a warrant and the case would not go back to court. Is this true? I have to ring the MP back on Friday afternoon and would really like to know where we stand on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help me? I'm new to this site and don't know if I'm doing this correctly. Forgive me if I'm not.

We took out a mortgage with Capston Mortgage Services (SPML) and although their interest rates were punitive we didn't have a problem with repayments initially. However, my husband had a couple of heart attack back in 2004 and we fell into arrears which, with all the costs incurred, amounted to £7000. We were taken to court and given a suspended repossession order an started to pay off the arears at £150 per month. This continued until 3 months ago when we found ourselves once more unable to make the payments (mortgage and arears). My husband is self employed and his main client went into liquidation earlier this year. We had managed to continue paying from savings until recently and we informed our MP that we were really struggling. We had earlier asked to be put on an interest only mortgage but were told that it wasn't possible. When I spoke to them I told them that my husband was about to re-start work for his client but we were waiting for them to sort out terms first. We are still waiting. The person I spoke to there appeared very understanding and said he would request that our account and situation be looked at by another department who might be able to help us. 3 weeks passed and we heard nothing so I rang them. The lady I spoke to said that there was nothing they could do to help. When I asked why, she didn't respond but suggested we take out a loan or got a family member to pay the shortfall on our account which was approximately £4,000, otherwise we would lose our home. My husband has secured some work, which will cover our mortgage and our agreed payment towards arrears at the end of this month, and he has applied for several lectureships and other less well-paid jobs too. I spoke to someone at the MP again today and I was told to see someone at the CAB as soon as possible and to also apply for any benefits we might be entitled to. He also suggested asking someone in the family to help. I am a full-time foster carer and earn about £160 per week and when I rang the benefits agency I was told I earned too much to entitle us to any benefits. I have now been told by a friend who works for the DWP that that is incorrect. This will also be looked into when we are at the CAB on Friday. Now to my question...

I have been told that because we have a suspended possession order the MP can simply apply for a warrant and the case would not go back to court. Is this true? I have to ring the MP back on Friday afternoon and would really like to know where we stand on this.

 

Hi Peeps

Your mortgage provider can apply straight to the county court for an eviction order. They will then serve Notice of Eviction form on you. Once you get this, don't waste any time, get a solicitor or (I hate to say this again) an independent claims and debt management co in your area [not touting]). Either of these companies will talk to your mortgage provider and immediately get a hearing at the county court to stop the eviction (by using a solicitor or barrister attached to them). The district judge can order that the arrears payments continue. In fact, the judge can make any number of orders, far more reasonable than turning you out of your home. In this respect, it's actually a good thing that hubby's had a couple of heart attacks, because the judge will be sympathetic and unwilling to evict a sick man who if stressed may have another heart attack, and so is therefore classified as "vulnerable" from his home. If minors are in the home, this is also considered. You must be able to show reasonable income and they will want to see an income & expenditure form from you. They (probably the mortgage provider but the court also) will provide it. Ideally you need to know what you're doing when completing this form. What I mean by that is, there are set, agreed trigger figures (maximum amounts) for the amounts you are allowed to use from your income for your expenditure, (which are quite generous) and a solicitor or decent claims company will know these.

 

An eviction can be stopped with less than 24 hours' notice, as the county court hears such applications on an emergency basis, so don't go worrying, and tell hubby not to worry. This situation is not as black as it appears.

 

What is evident is that if your interest rate was punitive, whether you signed the mortgage deal or not, you may have a case for an unfair contract. Were you given a cooling-off period? Did you have independent legal advice? Did the mortgage provider tell you to get independent legal advice? What was the role of the mortgage broker? You might like to seek advice on that.

 

Regards

Liz Southern

Oops, there goes another rubber tree plant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your words of wisdom! We were not given a cooling off period nor any independent legal advice and the MP did not encourage us to speak to one. When we last went to court, following my husband's heart attacks, the judge actually commented on the fact that the interest rates were extremely punitive. I have read other postings regarding the MP (SPML) and the shabby way they have dealt with others in this sort of situation and understand that they (SPML) are trading while insolvent. Do you know anything about this? Also, although our mortgage was taken over by another cvompany, we were never asked to sign a contract with them and we were never notified officially of the change, simply told during a telephone call. Earlier this year at the end of April, we noticed that SPML had been charging us for household insurance since 2006 even though we had our home insured with Churchill. I immediately contacted them and was told to get Churchill to post proof of insurance to them. Churchill did this by e-mail, fax (3 times) and by post and each time we were told they had not been received. In the end, Churchill sent the statements to us and we posted them to SPML by recorded delivery. I have asked on several occasions if our morgage account has been credited and most recently (a month ago) was told that they would write to inform me once it had been checked. We are still waiting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your words of wisdom! We were not given a cooling off period nor any independent legal advice and the MP did not encourage us to speak to one. When we last went to court, following my husband's heart attacks, the judge actually commented on the fact that the interest rates were extremely punitive. I have read other postings regarding the MP (SPML) and the shabby way they have dealt with others in this sort of situation and understand that they (SPML) are trading while insolvent. Do you know anything about this? Also, although our mortgage was taken over by another cvompany, we were never asked to sign a contract with them and we were never notified officially of the change, simply told during a telephone call. Earlier this year at the end of April, we noticed that SPML had been charging us for household insurance since 2006 even though we had our home insured with Churchill. I immediately contacted them and was told to get Churchill to post proof of insurance to them. Churchill did this by e-mail, fax (3 times) and by post and each time we were told they had not been received. In the end, Churchill sent the statements to us and we posted them to SPML by recorded delivery. I have asked on several occasions if our morgage account has been credited and most recently (a month ago) was told that they would write to inform me once it had been checked. We are still waiting!

Hi Peeps,

If by SPML you mean Southern Pactific Mortgage Ltd, they are owned by Lehman Brothers (American company - in trouble). It sounds as though your mortgage was mis-sold to you. You NEED a solicitor or Claims expert who knows what he/she is doing, to enter a defence or indeed, a counter-claim, against SPML. What a mortgage company will tell you is that they don't have to tell you that they have sold your mortgage on to another company. However, you can enter a Defence to any repossession proceedings by SPML that they don't have the right to repossess you, on the basis that once the mortgage is securitised (sold on) they are "dispossessing" you not "repossessing" you. They cannot repossess something they have no right to. A current Land Registry entry is not proof that the mortgage has not been securitised.

 

However, some judges don't like "technical" defences, so, let's keep things simple. Your mortgage was mis-sold. You had no cooling off period, no independent legal advice, the interest rate is punitive and an unfair business relationship. Your husband is vulnerable. Is the mortgage in joint names? If it is, were you both present when signing? Were both of you individually advised to get individual, independent legal advice? Did your husband bring the forms home for you to sign? This would give you a different and very strong defence to the mis-selling of the mortgage. (You would need different solicitors and different barristers in that case, because of the conflict of interest.)

 

You have a separate legitimate claim for the insurance payments. However, is there a clause in your mortgage document stating that you must accept an insurer of SPML's choice? In some mortgages or leases it is possible to write to the mortgage provider stating that you refuse their insurer and you will take out your own insurance. Take care, there is usually a deadline for fighting this if you are seeking a refund of past years' money. Best to take out an N1 claim in the County Court.

 

Was your mortgage self-cert? And was it for a full 25 years?

 

Firstly, on the insurance, write a complaint to SPML. Don't forewarn them as to any legal action you may be taking. Keep emotive language out of your letters, as you will be disclosing your letters to the court. If you don't want to disclose your letter to the court, put "Without Prejudice" at the top, after "Dear Sirs".

 

Do you know the name of this other mortgage provider?

 

Regards

Liz

Edited by Liz Southern
Added question

Oops, there goes another rubber tree plant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your comments. We do not have to take out insurance with one of their approved insurers. They reimbursed us for a couple of monthly payments around August time but not for the whole amount which goes back to 2006 and totals almost £700 - their calculation. I have been told repeatedly that this amount is going to be deducted from our arrears. We didn't sign our mortgage agreement in front of anyone - it was sent in the post, we signed it and returned it immediately to them. I will explain tomorrow what happened when we went to the CAB today. I didn't sleep last night and can't stay awake any longer...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hiya Happy New Year everyone just a quick update again well i still havent completed yet turns out the lady looking after my case has been poorly so my case has been passed tosomeone else. Well after speaking to him just before Christmas turns out that the offer is ready to be sent out to me the rent has been set but there is a short fall of about £5000 which my housing man from the council is trying to get spml to write off so to speak if not i have to see if i can get a loan from the repossession prevention fund so im once again still stuck in limbo any thoughts guys?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

had a call today from the mortgage company they have agreed to turn the shortfall after the sale of my house which is @£5000 into a loan which i am to pay back at @£100per month they have contacted the council and the housing association to hopefully we should complete in the next 4weeks or so. It will take me around 3 years to pay off the shortfall but at least the pressure will be lifted as my current mortgage is @ £535 per month plus they will sort out the repairs need to my house which i cannot afford to do myself so keep me in your thoughts guys i will let you know how i get on Michx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news. Fingers crossed it all goes smoothly for you and you can relax in your home :)

 

Your persistence has paid off, well done.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hiya me again i have finally recieved the offer letter and i have had to get a solicitor off the list provided she said she can hopefully get it done and dusted in @3-4weeks .... i will let you know how i get on its being a long road but hopefully im near the end

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone I bring you good news; finally after months of fretting and uncertainty we have finally completed; HOORAY!!!!!! I am no longer a home owner but now a tenant of a housing association in my area it has taken a while but today I'm smiling and extremely relieved that it is finally over and that I don't have to keep fretting and trying to make deals with the mortgage company and my kids haven't been disrupted and we can stay here i feel so blessed that I've being given a fresh start and chance well I've got to start a claim for housing benefit now but can anyone tell me what to do about the DWP payments? I need to call them to end the payments I know but I hope they wont stop my income support thinking i have money now as i didn't get a bean any advice would be good thank you,

 

Well i for one am very happy for the mortgage rescue scheme and it does work but it does take time :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, soo glad to hear it all worked out for you. Well done for sticking with it - it's been a long road, but you won in the end. Congratulations :)

 

Re the DWP payments, I assume you just tell them you're now renting ? Tell them your home was bought by the housing association under the government mortgage rescue scheme.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
I contacted Birmingham Midshires about going interest only, found them very unhelpful. This scheme wasn't even mentioned, all they said was contact the CCCS, which I have.

 

If I went interest only, I could release about £300 a month.

I also contacted BM about the scheme as I recently lost my job and found them to be very unhelpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

https://www.gov.uk/mortgage-rescue-scheme

 

It would appear this is no longer available.

 

However, other advice in this thread is relevant.

Edited by citizenB

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3131 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...