Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS Credit Card Charges Reclaim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guys,

 

I've been trying to get back £311.97 - £240 in unlawful charges plus £71.97 in interest incurred as a result of those charges - from BoS.

 

After the initial brush-off, they offered me £120 and then £240, which I politely declined.

 

These charges concerned a credit card which I have not used since November 2001 and which, as far as I was concerned, had been fully paid off. Certainly, I have received no correpsondence of any sort for the best part of five years.

 

I rang BoS last week to offer them one last opportunity to pay in full before I initiated a court claim and was told that I had never settled the account; that there was a debt of almost £1,000 outstanding; and that they were on the point of selling it to a third party.

 

Unfortunately, I can't find anything to prove that I settled the account - I fear it may have been done by an ex-girlfriend, with whom I am no longer in contact, on my behalf - which, I appreciate, doesn't leave me in a particularly strong position.

 

Be that as it may, I was certain this account had been settled and am more than a little suspicious that were that not the case I would have heard from BoS before now and/or they would not have waited very nearly five years to sell the debt to a third party.

 

Any thoughts/advice gratefully received.

 

Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing to do, then, is to send a SAR. Make sure you include a sentence in there to say that even while you await for them to fulfill your SAR, account is now officially in dispute and as such you expect them not to pass it to DCA. Take it from there once you have your statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bookworm,

 

Hi! And thanks for the advice.

 

As it happens, the woman I've been dealing with has been more very helpful. She conceded it was a little strange that if there was a debt outstanding, there'd been no correspondence or no attempt to sell it on for nearly five years and has already promised to send me some more detailed info.

 

I'll take a look at this - she said it should be in the post in the next 48 hours -and then send a SAR and accompanying letter.

 

Be that as it may, what do you reckon? Would it be common practice to allow a debt of around 1k to go completley unchased for five years? Seems more than a little odd to me!

 

I can't help thinking it's been settled - maybe even a few months down the road via a debt collection agency - and there's been some kind of cock-up at the BoS end, which, of course, it's going to be very difficult for me to prove after all this time.

 

Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...