Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scott & Co Council tax wages arrestment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2117 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recieved a letter from Scott & Co stating a wages arrestment for council tax arrears.

 

The council house is my girlfriends.

 

the wages arrestment letter has my girlfriends name on it with my work details, think this is because my gf told Scott & co my work details :(.

My girlfriend does not work.

 

Will the arrestment still go ahead through my workplace - with my girlfriends name on the details?

Thanks for any help.

 

I am going to try and get this resolved ASAP before the arrestment happens and offer some kind of payment.

 

P.s I am starting a new job in a month or so and I will be handing in my notice. what happens if the arrestment has already went ahead at this point.

 

Thanks for any help.

Edited by edinburgh09
Link to post
Share on other sites

I recieved a letter from Scott & Co stating a wages arrestment for council tax arrears.

 

The council house is my girlfriends.

 

the wages arrestment letter has my girlfriends name on it with my work details. my girlfriend does not work.

Were you living with your girlfriend for the period of the arrears?

 

Will the arrestment still go ahead through my workplace - with my girlfriends name on the details?
It shouldn't but it might. They could of course correct the name on the earnings arrestment if you are indeed liable.

 

The amount of any arrestment would depend the amount of money that you earn and is set out in The Statutory Deductions Tables in Schedule 2 of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987.

 

P.s I am starting a new job in a month or so and I will be handing in my notice. what happens if the arrestment has already went ahead at this point.
With the introduction of the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007 it is compulsory for the employer to tell the sheriff officers if the employee leaves their employment and the name and address of the new employer if known. Edited by rory32

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to try and get this resolved ASAP before the arrestment happens and offer some kind of payment.
When offering payment it's useful to know how much they would be able to deduct if they managed to obtain an earnings arrestment (you wouldn't want to offer too much). As previously stated the amount they can deduct is governed by statute. You'll find the amounts that they can deduct in the following link http://www.aib.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/4/0000460.pdf

 

Schedule 2 is about 3/4's of the way down or you can just click on the link in the contents table.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

 

I recieved a letter from Scott & Co stating a wages arrestment for council tax arrears.

 

The council house is my girlfriends.

 

the wages arrestment letter has my girlfriends name on it with my work details. my girlfriend does not work.

Were you living with your girlfriend for the period of the arrears? Yes I was

 

Quote:

Will the arrestment still go ahead through my workplace - with my girlfriends name on the details?

It shouldn't but it might. They could of course correct the name on the earnings arrestment if you are indeed liable.

 

The amount of any arrestment would depend the amount of money that you earn and is set out in The Statutory Deductions Tables in Schedule 2 of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987.

 

Quote:

P.s I am starting a new job in a month or so and I will be handing in my notice.

what happens if the arrestment has already went ahead at this point.

 

With the introduction of the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007 it is compulsory for the employer to tell the sheriff officers if the employee leaves their employment and the name and address of the new employer if known.

Do I have to inform my employer my new job details

Edited by edinburgh09
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I was
In which case you have joint and several liability. What that means is that they can either go after one of you for the money or both of you. Obviously it's not worth them attempting to pursue your girlfriend as she doesn't work.

 

Do I have to inform my employer my new job details
No but if you don't they may just arrest your bank account instead which may result in the funds held in your account being frozen.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems they have a habit of doing this! I volunteered for an arrestment of earnings order, and provided full details of myself and my workplace payroll dept. They STILL managed to do an AEO by using my name but my ex partner's work details. Eejits. However it could not go ahead because obviously my ex's work didn't have me on their books!

 

EDITED to add: When it didn't go through and I repeatedly rang them and asked over a three month period when they were going to set up the AEO correctly, they then did exactly as Rory stated, they arrested my bank account. Cue a very piddled off Scots woman who advised them they had better remove it otherwise I'd take action against them as I had done everything possible to rectify the debt, which wasn't even my debt to begin with!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scott & Co probably have the worst reputation of any sheriff officers amongst people who have had to deal with these issues, no great suprise in their actions (unfortunately) Erika from what I have heard about them.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the arrestment is served on your work with your partners name, it is the responsibility of your employment to return the order back to Scott & Co stating that the employee cannot be found within their organisation.

 

As for the liability, if its only your gf on the summery warrent then they should not have any interest in you....but that will be predetermined by the council.

 

As for employers having to give details regarding the next employer, then make sure you DO NOT give your current work any details, then they cannot serve the arrestment....

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the liability, if its only your gf on the summery warrent then they should not have any interest in you....but that will be predetermined by the council.

 

Both me & my girlfriend did recieve a charge for payment, two letters both in each others names, posted by hand through the letter box not even in an envelope, then a few days later the same two (photocopied) letters arrived by normal first class post.

6 weeks passed without us doing anything about it then the arrestment arrived in my gf's name with my work details.

 

Form 30 The debtors (scotland) Act 1987 section 47

Earnings arrestment

 

:(

 

I will phoning the council in the morning to try sort this all out once and for, hopefully never get in this mess again.

 

Thanks for everyones comments

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

Despite keeping in telephone contact with Scott and Co explaining that I was not working and as soon as I was I would set up a payment plan they still went into my bank account and took the full amount of what was owed plus nearly £100 on top for fees.

 

This money was in my account from my Uncle for new carpets, which are dearly needed.

 

As I have ordered the carpets and can no longer pay for them I have now had to borrow money.

 

Instead of paying Scott & Co in instalments and replacing 15 year old carpets I am now still in debt.

Well done Scott & Co and Glasgow City Council

- People may make Glasgow but Glasgow destroys people:

Link to post
Share on other sites

and sadly quite legal to do so

you should not of sat on your hands.

 

thread is almost 10yrs old

you will not get seen here

 

start a new thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...