Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Started the ball rolling...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6536 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent of my initial letter last Friday (10 March) recorded delivery to my branch of RBS. I received the standard reply dated the 13th, received the 15th.

 

What I'd like to know at this stage is that, in my initial letter, I'm claiming £900+ of charges, but being based in Scotland, if it goes to court do I have to claim this or could I drop this to the £750 small claims limit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:!: Read the FAQ's :!:

 

What you are looking for is right at the top.

Completed:

RBOS Charges - £2435 settled in full :)

RBOS Default Removal - Removed :)

Carphone Warehouse Default Removal - Removed :)

Welcome Finance Default Removal - Removed :)

Viking Direct CCJ - Removed :)

Littlewoods Default - Removed :-o

 

Ongoing:

N Hunter SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can dro it to £750. Also we think that once you win that you can try to go in for the rest.

 

Suggest that your first claim is about £700

Link to post
Share on other sites

ridiculous isn't it. Come and live in England

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, received a reply from my branch today, Special Delivery. It goes like so...

 

Thank you for your letter of 10 March 2006 and I apologise for any dissatisfaction caused by the application of charges to your account.

 

We believe that our charges are fair, reasonable and transparent. We consider that amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accorndance with your agreement with us and our published tariff, which we are satisfied, complies with all applicable laws and regulations. We are also committed to ensuring the transparency of the information that we give to our customers about the operation of our products.

 

Against that background, we must differ to the views expressed in your letter. Accordingly, the charges that have been applied to your account must stand.

 

However, thank you again for taking the trouble to write.

 

I presume this is a fairly standard reply from RBS?

 

Incidentally, is the £750 limit the maximum you can claim or the maximum you can be awarded? (e.g. incl costs, interest, etc)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The max you can claim - excluding costs and interest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent of my final letter on Monday before commencing legal action. Haven't received a reply yet. I've yet to see someone stating that they've had a significant refund yet. Most of the success stories to date seem to be for amounts below £100.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can use the next level of sherriff court action which is Summary Cause for claims between £750 -1500. You can represent yourself, or have representation, but might be liable for costs if you lose. Information here

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/sheriff/summary_cause/guidance_notes.asp

Bank of Scotland round 1: £740 + costs settled, still sore over the 8% grrr

Bank of Scotland round 2: £629 +101.15 interest +£39 costs settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can use the next level of sherriff court action which is Summary Cause for claims between £750 -1500. You can represent yourself, or have representation, but might be liable for costs if you lose. Information here

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/sheriff/summary_cause/guidance_notes.asp

 

Thanks fruitycar but that's not what I was refering to. It seems like most of the posts posted to date for successful refunds have been for smaller amounts such as £70, £34, etc.

 

I haven't seen one for say £600.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, received a reply from my branch today, Special Delivery. It goes like so...

 

 

 

I presume this is a fairly standard reply from RBS?

 

Incidentally, is the £750 limit the maximum you can claim or the maximum you can be awarded? (e.g. incl costs, interest, etc)

I received an almost identical reply from the RBS, as the one below from mparter, stating that they believe their charges to be fair. I did receive £35.00 "as a gesture of goodwill, but any charges that accrue in the future must stand". I am planning my second letter shortly, although I am concerned about the lack of success from fellow fighters. I do not mind paying overdraft charges, but £28 for going about £100 overdrawn is appalling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone in the bank is allowed to refund 1 charge per customer every quarter..

 

What bank r u talking about? This is definitely NOT the case at RBS.

 

In RBS branches only the manager can give authority to refund charges and even then is limited to £50. They also have a charge refunds budget to stick to which limits chances of getting money back further.

The branch manager regularly (daily?) looks at a log of what charges have been refunded & who has refunded them. We are absolutely not allowed to refund any charges without managers authorisation and if we did we'd be found out and face possible warnings or sacking.

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

What bank r u talking about? This is definitely NOT the case at RBS.

 

We are absolutely not allowed to refund any charges without managers authorisation and if we did we'd be found out and face possible warnings or sacking.

 

you work in a bank?????????

 

I know a friend in the Bank Of Ireland who told me this, and my experience with the BOS Branch staff, i was told this was correct, obviously they keep tabs on it but it is acceptable..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, today is the 7th working day since I sent my second letter to RBS. I received what appears to be a stalling letter from their Group Customer Relations department, which goes like so...

 

Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding charges on your account, which has been passed to our office for investigation. In view of your comments, we have asked for a full briefing from those involved. Once this received, a formal response will be sent to you.

 

We will aim to get a response out to you as soon as we can but we also want to make sure that a thorough investigation takes place. If, for any reason, there looks like being a delay, we will, of course, write to you again to explain why.

 

If you have any queries in the meantime, please fell free to contact us.

 

"we have asked for a full briefing from those involved", don't they mean a print-out from their systems as it's mostly automated process nowadays is it not?

 

I presume this is them trying to slow things down. Should I respond with a "thanks for your letter", "I'll give you x days to reply"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too received an identical letter from RBS this morning. Must have a standard letter - keep your letter for over a month then just churn off a standard one.

 

They had taken over a thousand pounds in six years but we have never been over for more than a day at a time. The latest was a few weeks ago when I was due to go over just over a pound. I realised just in time and paid in £5 although at the time I didn't have the right paying in book I paid into my other account and went home to transfer the payment through online banking. 36 hours later and the payment still had not shown up on my account and I was not able to transfer the payment. Consequently I had £60 in charges taken from my account.

 

On the other hand, two years ago I sent an international transfer through RBS (a regular monthly transaction I made) to our bank in the USA to make payments on mortgage and expenses for property we own. Three weeks later the payment arrived back in our account minus some charges and a loss on the exchange rate. We queried this and it transpired that the bank had keyed in the wrong number. They eventually refunded the charges and made up the loss on the exchange rate and despite the manager promising that we would be compensated this was not forthcoming. After further letters - the person who dealt with it had left etc. etc. we got nowhere. The delay in getting money to our US account had caused us enormous problems with excess bank charges, mortgage late fees etc. Also it had triggered the HOA to apply for a lien on our home as they had not received payment on time.

~They would not accept our late payment without solicitors fees etc., amounting to over a thousand dollars. We contested the action but a lawyer required $5000 down payment to sort it out for us. Consequently, we had to sort the matter out ourselves and this involved a considerable amount of time studying American law on the internet etc. The bank never even apologised without us asking.

 

This is only the latest in a long line of problems we have had with RBS stretching right back to 1990 when they overcharged us £3000 in two years on our home mortgage. They lost us two sales of our property by delaying sending our deeds to our solicitor and then denying that they had received the letters.

Not sure whether to go to Ombudsman again or to County Court - any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received another letter today from the same department as yesterday, Group Customer Relations department.

 

Basically re-iterating all that's been stated to date, their charges are fair, etc and if I'm not happy to go to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Looks like it's small claims time.

 

Do I have to submit a claim straight away? Is there a perceived limit as to how long since the last correspondance I can wait before initiating court action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, got my Small Claims court paperwork filled out and my statement of claim details attached. I've also included the Excel spreadsheet with the list of charges.

 

Should I include the 8% interest details or just print it out and hand it over without this?

I'm handing it in today, wish me luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi mark and well done.

How did you know you had a court date? Did the court inform you?

Our moneyclaim has been acknowledged by rbs with intention of defending but theres no mention of court dates. As far as I can see you're the only sucessful rbs claimant so far.

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6536 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...