Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2nd court summons for council tax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, just wanting some advice about my council tax arrears , this is the second time we are in court as we fell behind with our payment agreement, could someone tell me what to expect this time round, we are thinking of going bankrupt in the next few months and i am wondering if we could include the council tax arrears ? Should we tell them this is what we are going to do ? We are self employed so i dunno if they can still attach an order for an amount or not on our income?

 

any advice would be gratefully recieved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact you are planning bankruptcy doesn't stop the council from taking recovery action once the Liability Order has been awarded. Only once the bankruptcy order been granted would it take in to account any debt (i.e council tax) accrued before the date of bankruptcy.

 

An attachment of earnings order could not be issued for a self employed person, unless you could make a suitable payment arrangement then the council would have little option other than to issue the account to a bailiff for collection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the council would have little option other than to issue the account to a bailiff for collection

 

The councils have lots of options, they just can't be bothered and have no interest at all in the ability to pay. Councils are more and more taking banktuptcy orders out against those who cannot pay council tax and have falling in arrears.

 

In other words, on the orders of this government, they just couldn't care less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't any other real option open in the legislation - the options for the council in this case are withdraw the liability order, accept an arrangement or issue to a bailiff.

 

The council is extremely unlikely to withdraw the order therefore its either an arrangement or a bailiff. Bankruptcy needs the account to have been issued to a bailiff first and as the OP is considering it any way there's not much point considering that option yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ann622,

The council will normally after/if you have de-faulted on a previous arrangement, still go for the Liability order, to give them the extra lever, however have you not tried to come to another arrangement re the arrears,as long as you are prepared to pay as much as you can afford. Some good councils who look after their customers do not neccessarily take up the enforcement part of the Liability order and will make further arrangements with you as long as you keep up the payments. Remember liability orders do not run over the specified period of time and have to be re-newed by the council after each period of liability for council tax. Councils are OBLIGED by statute to take your payments keep paying the council, not neccessarily bailiffs who can ONLY enter your property at your invitation, even after a liability order has been obtained, do not allow them in as they will LEVY/DISTRAIN your furniture etc. Remember you are not refusing to pay only finding it financialy difficult. I am sure someone else will come along and give you some more advice/options. Please talk with your customer Service dept of your Local Council they should/can help before/if you go to court. They have got to make application for the order as it is our wonderful Governments direction. Good Luck. ;) "EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...