Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MONUMENT - what happened to them?


Gunner77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5563 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all I have posted previously and am in the process of defending a County Court Claim from HFO Services Ltd/Turnbull Rutherford regarding an old Monument credit card I had. I settled this account back in November 2006 and then left my parents home and unbeknown to me, both Barclaycard and HFO had placed defaults on my account. Barclaycard removed theirs and assured me that as the account was not showing up on their records it must have been settled. I relayed this to HFO but to no avail and they have now progressed matters to a CCC. Now Barclaycard tell me that they have no details of my account as they only bought Monument in June 2007. So who can I write to or call with regards to my account and getting some evidence. I have sent a letter to Turbull Rutherford as advised with my CPR request which they have received today (sent special delivery). Now what should i do? (Unfortunately the debt was paid by my father, who is now suffering badly with Parkinson's so it is very hard to get copy statements and the one I have was forwarded to Barclaycard!!) What should I do? Does anyone the history of Monument? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you rang Barclaycard, they will tell you anything,

 

BARCLAYCARD are the people to write to, full stop.

 

The Monument Card is Issued by Compucredit UK Limited,

Their registered number is 06032187 and registered address:

The Portland Building

25 High Street

Crawley

West Sussex

RH10 1BG

 

 

25 High Street is the Barclays Building.

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so what do I do, Barclaycard are telling me this is not them, I even have a complaint against them regarding the way they have resolved this query. Is there anywhere I can find solid evidence? The detials are that I took out my Monument card back in 2005, and it was defaulted (incorrectly in my opinion) in Jan 2007 and then again by HFO in 2007. Who can I contact in order to find out the state of the account? Surely if Barclaycard have no record and as far as I know they are meant to keep records for 6 years, how can there be a case to answer against HFO??? HELP PLEASE. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, so what are the chances that HFO have the relevant paperwork and what do they need in order to press their claim against me? I am sure I don't owe any money, but without my fathers bank statement what else can i do??? (long story re my father!!) Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, thanks for all your help. Sent request to Barclaycard, but has anyone got any firm history for Monument please? Just need to know what happened to them between 2005 and 2007? Just that this debt case has now progressed to a County Court claim by Turnbull Rutherford on behalf of HFO Services Ltd. I just need to find out who actually has the full account details and would have the original credit agreement etc. Trying to build my defense case so any help much apprecaited. I have sent CCA to Barclaycard and CPR to Turnbull Rutherford. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant get the link to work I thnk my browsers benn hijacked will post details of what site said. (link is going to Donald Duck?)

 

this states Monument was sold by Barclays in 2007 to another company.

 

I found this don't know if it will help you at all, and this is an excerpt from a site I found that says Barclays owned Monument in 2004:

 

'Debt that wouldn't lie down

 

Mrs F. M. writes: I am writing in sheer desperation. I have a default showing on my Experian credit file, registered by Cabot Financial. Cabot bought the alleged debt from the Monument credit card company. However, the debt I had with Monument was settled in March 2004.

 

The Experian credit reference agency is like a library. It stores information, but it does not write it or erase it. If anyone disputes the accuracy of their file, the best Experian can do is offer to add a statement recording this, and that is exactly what it offered you.

The material held by Experian is entered by firms that offer credit. Monument is one of these and in 2004 you owed £2,731. In fact, the card company accepted £1,798 from you in full settlement.

That should have ended the matter, but Monument failed to write off the balance in its books. The debt was sold to Cabot, which hoped to turn a profit by collecting the full amount from you. With charges, this came to more than £1,000.

I invited Cabot to comment, but it didn't. Barclays, which owned Monument in 2004, was more helpful. It got the new owners of the card company to dig out their old records and find the mistake. By now you will have received an apology from Monument and all references to the debt have been wiped from your records'.

 

 

Thx Lumi

Edited by Luminol
link invalid
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mystery solved over Monument card

 

 

 

 

What it said:

 

"I have a Monument credit card. I have just been told by Barclaycard, which runs the card, that it is being transferred next month to Raphaels Bank and CompuCredit. Who are they?

WS, London

CompuCredit is a US finance company which specialises in "trailer park credit" - lending to those with poor repayment records. In April it paid Barclays £490m for Monument's 200,000 mostly active cardholders. Monument, charging high interest rates to its mostly less creditworthy customers, was previously Providian.

Raphaels is a little-known private bank, founded in 1787 and based in Aylesbury, Bucks. It has a UK banking licence which CompuCredit can use. It has savings accounts and some niche plastic card activities."

 

4th April 2007

BARCLAYS PLC

 

BARCLAYS PLC PARTIAL SALE OF MONUMENT BUSINESS TO

COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION

 

 

Barclays PLC (‘Barclays’) today announces the sale of part of the Monument credit card portfolio (‘the Sale Portfolio’). Barclays credit card and consumer lending business, Barclaycard, has agreed to sell the Sale Portfolio and associated servicing capabilities to CompuCredit International Acquisition Corporation and CompuCredit UK Limited, which are both subsidiaries of CompuCredit Corporation (‘CompuCredit’) for a consideration of approximately £390 million payable in cash. The consideration is subject to final adjustment following determination of the actual amount of the gross receivables sold. The consideration is expected to be finalised during the second quarter of 2007.

 

The Sale Portfolio is being sold for a consideration which is broadly in line with net book value and includes approximately £490 million of gross receivables,

including a tranche of accounts in collections. The Sale Portfolio represents about 2% of Barclaycard’s loans and advances to customers as at 31st December 2006.

 

Barclaycard will retain a proportion of the Monument portfolio, representing approximately £130 million of receivables [20% MONEY WISE], which are primarily higher quality accounts and will integrate this with the main Barclaycard branded book.

- ENDS -

Link to post
Share on other sites

So sorry to be a wally, but who would hold the account details on this account? It was started in 2005 and defaulted in Jan/Feb 2007? I assume from previous posts that Barclaycard should hold account details? But they claim they can't find anything? They say the account was sold onto HFO Services, so does this mean that HFO services should have all the paperwork relating to this account? I know that ALL account information must be held for 6 years, right? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...