Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Journo Russell Scott has been looking at people who sold PPE to the Johnson government. https://twitter.com/RussellScott1/status/1780686322908487787  
    • It is important that you do the reading about this subject in the sub- forum. It's not complicated but you need to be in control and I don't think you are. For instance, much of the information you need and also the case transcripts that you're looking for are in the fixed topics at the top of this sub- forum but clearly you didn't know that. You will gain in confidence if you do the reading. Particularly as it now looks as if the mediation has not worked because EVRi have stayed you up and so you may now be going to trial. You need to understand thoroughly what you are doing. We will help you and you will find our support is unstinting but you have to do your part. Please spend a lot of time reading the stories on the sub- forum especially the pinned posts at the top of the sub- forum and then start preparing your court bundle. We have instructions here for everything
    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide debt -NCCS/KRP now MKDP - **ACK'd Now SB'd**


cleo4patra
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2065 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a very strange letter today from a debt collection agency for NCCS .

 

 

I had CCA'd Nationwide and had no response

- I sent non compliance letter ( cannnot demand payment , pass on to DCA etc).

 

 

What I don't understand is that the DCA have written (without prejudice) offering me a disounted settlement with no detriment on my credit file

- limited offer for seven days only)

 

I am puzzled - any ideas??? thanks Cleo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am unsure what to do next - may write and ask exactly what they are offering?

Think Nationwide ad, think juicy worm, think reeling you in!! :eek:

Don't take the bait. I'd send them this Dear John letter

Ref No: xxxx

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

However your client, Nationwide have singularly failed to respond to my letters dated xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx whiich required them to supply a true copy of a properly executed Consumer Credit agreement.

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a very good letter - thank you. Do they ever settle ?

well on further investigation K P R debt collector is actually Nationwide. To look at the letter you would never believe it. At very bottom in tiny print "K P R is business name of Nationwide Building Society"????? It is quite deceiving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Think Nationwide ad, think juicy worm, think reeling you in!! :eek:

Don't take the bait. I'd send them this Dear John letter

Sent said letter Ie no CCA etc - but KPR have now sent final demand!! The account is still indispute so is there a further letter to send please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am unsure of next step?? Can anyone help please??

 

I would just write back thanking them for their harassment letter which you will retain within your harassment file.

 

Place account in dispute in big bold letters at the start of the letter.

 

Refer them to your previous letter and remind them of their obligations under the oft debt collection guidance and enclose a copy of your previous letter for their reference.

 

Report them to the enforcement authorites;)

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just write back thanking them for their harassment letter which you will retain within your harassment file.

 

Place account in dispute in big bold letters at the start of the letter.

 

Refer them to your previous letter and remind them of their obligations under the oft debt collection guidance and enclose a copy of your previous letter for their reference.

 

Report them to the enforcement authorites;)

strangely enough I sent that letter today after having a good trawl on this site!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

i have received a demand from wescot for an NCCS credit card that has already been to several DCA's. Have been through all of the procedures - collected a supposed "Agreement" from the branch. This consists of a copy of a "Priority Application" with absolutely NO prescribed terms whatsoever. NCCS and all the previous DCA's KNOW this. Wescot insist I have to pay in full. All the form consists of is:

name and address, password, PIN issue,

Job title,

Card Protection plan and my signature, no payment terms , credit limit no APR or interest rates. Help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remind them that they are breaching OFT guidelines and request they return it to previous DCA.

Next time they threaten demand a copy of their complaints procedure, telling them why you are making a formal complaint.

This action can have them running.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remind them that they are breaching OFT guidelines and request they return it to previous DCA.

Next time they threaten demand a copy of their complaints procedure, telling them why you are making a formal complaint.

This action can have them running.

thanks - I have been through all of the ususal stuff - however I have now referred them to the latest judgment Southern Pacific Securities v Walker and referred to the paragraph - missing prescribed terms = wholly unenforceable. Lets what happens now.

 

many thanks

 

Cleo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

well - it's been ages since I posted on this thread

- been having letters for ages from MKDP

 

 

">>>>we are trying to find a copy of your agreement....."

(I picked a copy up from the Nationwide branch years ago and it was application form no prescribed terms.

 

 

Now I have received a letter from them today"..

 

 

.we are concerned that correspondence addressed to you has been returned from your address.

 

 

In response to the returned mail received,

we have undertaken further investigation using Credit Reference Agencies in addition to other reliable databases

and this information has led us to understand you still reside at the same address

... please contact us to discuss further..."

 

NOW I AM NOT PLEASED!!!!!

 

 

I have not sent any mail back and I think the letter implies I am being deceitful/underhand.

 

 

I believe this debt is not just unenforceable but also SB now.

 

 

Anyone else had such a communication????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Had a letter today from MKDP - for ages and ages they have sent me letters "still trying to deal with your complaint...."

 

 

after they received my Statute Barred letter

miraculously they have found a copy of the "agreement"

 

 

which is copy of application form same as I collected from the branch years ago (see posts on this thres)

they also enclose a copy of a letter I sent to Raven Revoceries in June 2012 -

this letter explains I only ever received app form copy/quotes cases/ unenforceable etc (think its a template letter).

 

 

They say this letter counts as acknowledging the account.

 

 

Anyone help please?

 

 

have had response from MKDP to my letter . I explained had sent no mail back and also that this was now SB under Limitation Act. MKDP have "noted my dispute.......and are contacting Nationwide...... all collection activity now on hold......."
Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you start up letter tennis again after 4yrs...

 

 

thats exactly what they want you to do .

 

 

what does your credit file say?

 

 

oh and ignore them

 

 

the RR letter [which is them] does not ack the debt

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to go through the paperwork again

- I think I had nothing from anyone for ages which may explain the gap.

 

 

I thought if it went to court it was perceived as not good practice to not reply.

I didn't realise they were the same organisation either.

 

 

They say this their final decision and I am liable for the debt.

 

 

I know that I haven't paid for over six years .......thanks for your input

 

 

why did you start up letter tennis again after 4yrs...

 

 

thats exactly what they want you to do .

 

 

what does your credit file say?

 

 

oh and ignore them

 

 

the RR letter [which is them] does not ack the debt

 

 

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

once a CCA request fails

 

 

its always best to stop all letter tennis.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Letter from MKDP (I sent them the Statute barred letter a while ago) apologising..

 

 

. "I can verigy this account is now closed and you will be no longer pursued for the debt..."

 

 

Apologise for distress and inconvenience and enclose a cheque for £50!!!.

 

 

I understand MKDP are now "Hoist"?

 

Anyway it was nice to get the cheque

 

 

however my name is incorrect on the cheque so they are sending a replacement ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

well : I tried to claim PPI for this in 2016 but was deemed not mis -sold. I had forgotten I claimed to be honest and recently went through some paperwork and sent them another claim. Received letter saying had previously tried with copy of rejection letter. Further letter saying undisclosed commission : greater than the 50% threshold and a cheque on the way For £700.00 + !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

another plevin win then...

 

 

well done

 

don't forget to donate if you can to keep us here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...