Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS and Monthly Charge - Options?


danmoz98
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5588 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Some time ago my girlfriend opened an account with RBS, what doesn't appear to have been made clear was that there was a monthly fee (I guess like Advantage Gold with Natwest?).

 

She's never used this account, she's not even put the card in an ATM. It was basically just meant to be a reserve account.

 

A few months ago she started receivng letters saying she was overdrawn. She couldn't understand why as she'd never paid anything into the account, nor withdrawn anything from it.

 

It was at this point she discovered this account had a monthly fee, which they'd taken, and as there was no money in the account they began applying overdraft charges.

 

She's argued the toss with them on the phone before and they refuse to refund anything. As it stands she's overdrawn by £500.

 

What is the best course of action here?

 

I suggested she write them a letter explaining she's never used the account and that when she opened it there was no mention of a monthly fee. I also suggested she get them to explain what this monthly fee is for at which point she should then argue that as she's not even using the account how can they possibly justify charging her for a 'service' she isn't using.

 

Any other suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly in opening this account she will have signed for the charge (I believe its a royalties Gold account) which will have been debited from the account.

 

The bulk of the fees will be unauthorised overdraft - My advice would be calculate the gold fees and pay them - close the account and then put in a claim regarding the unfair charges.

 

Some of the monthly fee is insurance - life insurance and the like - and as she is on risk I doubt you could claim that she isnt using the service - they have provided cover...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to throw in my own two cents and hopefully give some decent advice ...

 

If your girlfriend wasn't informed of the monthly fee then she might have a claim that she was mis-sold the product. However, a double edged sword in that when she signed the paperwork she effectively agreed that she would pay it. Part of the process of opening the account, either in the branch or over the telephone, is to have the full 'benefits' explained - the travel insurance, the discount tickets, eating-out vouchers, etc. and that would have to include the fee being mentioned.

 

If she's never used the account, unfortunately that doesn't give her the chance to opt out of paying the fees. When she received her first statement she would have also received an accompanying note telling her the service charge for the period wherein the account had been opened.

 

She would have been informed of the overdraft situation within the first month of it occuring (or at least she should have). The overdraft rate is somewhat extortionate, however the fact she is now £500 overdrawn strikes me as very odd as it would have taken just under 10 months to reach that stage if she owned the Royalties Gold account (£12.95 p/m @ 29.84% AER) and so the bank will probably put up a fairly strong fight that she received her statements and it was her own duty to act upon the information they supplied.

 

If she's using Digital Banking and has opted to work with paperless statements that, unfortunately, still won't help her any. I think your idea is a good one; write a letter - explain your dissatisfaction and ensure you keep a dated log (and a copy of the letter) for each and every piece of correspondence you send and receive. I would also advise that you look outwith the bank for assistance - I'm positive there will be a financial authority that will drag the RBS over the coals if they have failed to mention the monthly fee, however it is her word against theirs ...

 

They will be able to explain the monthly fees, it's all their in their brochures and pamphlets and the only way you'll really be able to win this one is if you can pin the tail on the donkey of the branch advisor who opened the account and (possibly) failed to mention a key point of the terms and conditions. One of the points however, is the fact that with a Royalties Gold account an interest-free overdraft should be put in place by default. Perhaps ask them why that was never placed on the account?

 

Her limited options are;

Mis-sold the product.

T&Cs not fully explained.

Information relating to the account not issued fast enough.

No interest-free overdraft applied to account.

 

Hope this has been of help. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...