Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sterling Collections


NailPost
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5429 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They are SP. Sterling Collections are a dormant company so they have no employees. I wonder who would answer the phone if I was to call.....

 

Can someone remind me of the law that says a debt collector has to have a data controller, it can't hide under someone else's licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I closed a business account down with Scottish Power last July. They sent a final bill, we paid and that was that - or so I thought. In December we received another final bill for £1500 based on a meter reading from a new occupant! Despite opening a complaints procedure with SP, we get a letter from Sterling Collections about every two or three weeks threatening court action if we don't pay. We have written and phoned them to explain we are in discussions with SP over the bill but they choose to ignore us (even hung the phone up on my business partner one time). I had my suspicions they were an inhouse department of SP and now my suspicions have been verified. Obviously, SP think its more intimidating for people to get a letter from a collections agency rather than one from themselves. Sneaky baskets.

 

The complaint hasn't been open long enough to go to the energy ombudsman yet but I am logging all calls and correspondence for when I do. I suggest anyone else does the same then after 8 weeks or if you get a 'deadlock' letter from SP, go to the energy ombudsman for them to look into for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just received a letter from this lot for an overdue account with the wonderful Scottish Power, despite the fact I told SP when the bill would be paid. (It was a bill for just under £600-00 to heat a 3 bedroom semi for a quarter).

 

Should I be worried about Sterling?

 

When I called Sterling to tell them when the bill would be paid, she automatically started talking about paying SP by monthly direct debit!!!!

 

I immediately got suspicious that this mob were actually a front for SP's collections department, perhaps I'm right?

Archway

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now been advised by SP that the reason I am still getting threatening letters from Sterling Collections is that my complaint was closed on, get this, 113th Feb. SP seem to have trouble getting their dates right and I am highly suspicious it is a method they use to cover their own backs. I have emailed them to ask why I wasn't advised of this before even though I have contacted them twice since Feb. I don't expect a satisfactory answer so have also advsd I want my complaint escalating to Executive Complaints Board level. Thats the final stage before going to the energy ombudsman.

 

Anyone having similar trouble should check out SPs charter and complaints procedure - they don't seem to operate within these but, as far as I am concerned, that is just more fuel to the fire when I eventually go to the ombudsman. Also check out the Office of Fair Trading guidelines on debt collection and quote any relevant parts in your communications to SP so they know you mean business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I mailed Scotiish Power asking for an explanation as to who exactly were Sterling Collections.

 

Here is their response:

 

SPM Collections are Scottish Powers internal debt collection team. We will send

out reminder letters until the account has been paid in full. Reminder is

issued after 10 days then if not paid call will be attempted after about 30

days. If the bill remains outstanding after this we will usually pass the

account to an outside legal agent to collect. When we issue the bill it is due

to be paid immediately as bills are issed in arrears so you have already used

the gas and electricity the bill relates to

 

Now I am by no means any form of legal expert, but in my mind, this company uses an internal department, in the guise of an external collections company, to frighten people into paying up.

 

Is this legal? I'm in the process of changing supplier because I think I am being overcharged by SP every single bill I get.

 

We only have an ordinary semi detached three bedroomed house but in the last year we have used 31570KwHrs of gas. Scottish Power thinks this is normal. I don't, and talking to my neighbours in very similar properties, neither do they. We are out at work most of the day, the boiler is on a timer, the heating turned down low as we have the luxury of a coal fire.

 

Can anyone tell me if this is a lot as I can't seem to find out.

 

Regards all,

 

Archway

Archway

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My son has been renting his house out but it has been empty since September last year, then today I receive a letter from Sterling Collections demanding £2++ as unpaid power usage, "despite several requests for payments". Thing is that neither myself nor the lettings agency have ever received a letter from Scottish power or Sterling Collections asking for this mythical amount.

 

What do these people think they are doing, I just love receiving threatening letters on a Friday night !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

So pleased to find this thread.

 

Hubbie has just closed his late father's business, owes £329 to Scottish Power.

 

He cannot clear the debt and as they represent only about 1% of total debt, we have to treat them pro-rata with any available funds (my husbands wages!)

 

He's moved out of the premises they are no longer a priority debt as if they cut him off it's not going to be a problem. We've been told this by Debtline.

 

We sent them a letter explaining problem, advising them of arranged meetings with CAB & CCCS (charitable debt mgmt plan company) this month and sent a token payment of £10.

 

This they have cashed and on the second charming letter from Sterling Collections they record this payment as the debt has dropped to £319.

 

But they are threatening "Notice of court proceedings & impending default" and very cheekily refer continuing non-payment (they've clearly shown on their own paperwork that a payment has been processed!)

 

How serious are these Sterling Collections, are these threats just bully boy tactics it hope of scaring the living daylights out of you (it's working pretty well have to say!!) or do they follow through fairly promptly after this ?

 

Not going to pay up, we can, any available funds has to be distributed pro-rata and with their 1% they aint going to be getting big amounts.

 

We are hoping to setup DMP but I think these guys are going to be the monsters in the pack.

 

Any info of this lot very much appreciated.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately no funds in the estate, but my husband worked with his dad, did seprate tax returns but think they's just say it his responsibilty. No partnership existed on paper, but going to be very difficult to prove, in a way that may get this lot of our backs.

 

They seem to be all guns blazing type sort of company. Just trying to find out from anyone with dealings with them if it is a lot of hot air or they say we'll start court proceedings they mean it ?

 

Many thanks for your reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said, your husband is not liable for this debt;

 

2u7t9g1.gif

 

Make a complaint to your local trading standards & the OFT with regards to their harassment and threats, they are in clear breach of OFT guidelines & CPUT ;

 

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/DebtCollectionComplaintForm.DOC

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

 

[email protected]

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Debt collection practices

 

tel: 020 7211 5823

Debt collection guidance - Final guidance on unfair business practices - oft664

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your reply.

 

How can we prove that my husband isnt liable ? He took over the day to day running of the business although his dad was still owner, so all the creditors are coming after him.

 

If going to see a solicitor or accountant would sort it out definately we'd consider it although goodness knows where we'd find the money, but I've asked on every forum, Business Debtline, etc.. and they all say he shouldnt be liable but not definate.

 

If we knew for definate it would be worth standing our ground, but if not we run the risk of court proceedings and even bigger debts.

 

Got an appointment with CAB on wed but been told they probably wont help with this and just dont know where to go from there.

 

Complaining to OFT may help to get Scottish power to back off but just so worried how to really deal with these people.

 

Other major concern is the address they keep using is his father's address, and so worried that they'll start turning up there or somehow get hold of the tel number (it's ex-directory) we're trying to keep this from his widow as she's very ill herself. Could give them our address but then that's giving them another person to get their teeth into.

 

All such a nightmare, dont know what to do for the best .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to prove anything, he could well have managed the business but that does not make him responsible for it's debts. Who's name was the business in; the utility bills in, who was the 'boss'? His father obviously.

 

If your husband had worked for someone who wasn't a relative & they died do you think he would be responsible for any debts owed by his employer? Of course not & it's just the same in this case with his late father. Debts are paid from the Estate & as I said if there are insufficient funds it ends right there. If these creditors were to try and take your husband to court for these debts they would be laughed straight out of it again & they would be liable for both costs and damages to your husband.

 

As I said above, tell the creditors to bog right off and make a complaint to your local Trading Standards and the OFT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...