Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ordinary cause or lots of small claims???? help please!


mckay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6491 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am currently putting together a letter to Bank of Scotland to claim back just over £3500 in bank charges.

 

I have read through all the FAQ's and have searched through loads of posts to find the best course of action.

 

I have also tried reading the info on the Scottish Courts website but I am finding it hard to understand. Also there are no guidance notes for the ordinary cause.

 

I know in an ordinary cause I would be liable for the banks expenses if I lost but this is a risk I am willing to take to avoid the hassle of 5 separate claims.

 

Can anyone who can understand the differences in the small claims, summary cause and ordinary causes please explain in simple terms what the differences are?

 

Thanks

Bank of Scotland 1st claim - £513 settled in full after court proceedings

 

Bank of Scotland 2nd claim - £361 + interest LBA sent 17/7/06

 

Bank of Scotland claiming £3242 (for a mate) Data Protection Act letter sent and 5 years of statements sent out 20/7/06

 

Capital One - Data Protection Act letter sent 21/7/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is your legal knowledge and experience like? You would have to be able to frame pleas-in-law and statement of facts? Also you would have to arrange service of writ yourself (via sheriff officers or solicitors).

 

Can I ask where you live. BTW the reason no-one responded quickly was probably due to the fact that they prefer you read the FAQs first!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

 

My legal knowledge and experience is a few weeks of reading posts and guidance notes on here!

I live in Scotland

 

I have read through the FAQ's and I can only find info on small claims and summary causes but as I live in Scotland the maximum for small claims is £750!

It also says in the FAQ's that there are some advantages to claiming outside the small claims track, what are these advantages?

 

If you keep your claim value under £5000 then the case should stay on the County Court Small Claims Track. This way, if you lose, you shouldn't be liable for costs.

However, there are actually some advantages to claiming above £5000 - this is discussed in greater detail on the forums.

 

I havent a clue what frame pleas-in-law or arranging service of writs mean!

Does this only have to be done for an ordinary cause or is this needed for a summary cause as well?

Bank of Scotland 1st claim - £513 settled in full after court proceedings

 

Bank of Scotland 2nd claim - £361 + interest LBA sent 17/7/06

 

Bank of Scotland claiming £3242 (for a mate) Data Protection Act letter sent and 5 years of statements sent out 20/7/06

 

Capital One - Data Protection Act letter sent 21/7/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

The quote about £5,000 relates to English, not Scottish law.

 

FWIW, I'm in Scotland, dealing with HBOS, and I'm using the English court in Halifax. All seems to be going as normal at the moment (Acknowledged with intention to defend 10th July).

Bank of Scotland - £4000+ returned. Scottish resident, scottish accounts, but it's Halifax Bank of Scotland now, so took 'em to court in Halifax. One small claims, one defence filed, one refund of all charges + interest! Done and dusted.

Next - Capital One :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is your account with the Halifax or Bank of Scotland?

Does it matter?

 

Sorry for all the questions but could I then take my claim up in an English court even though the account is with the Bank of Scotland in a Scottish Branch and I live in Scotland?

Bank of Scotland 1st claim - £513 settled in full after court proceedings

 

Bank of Scotland 2nd claim - £361 + interest LBA sent 17/7/06

 

Bank of Scotland claiming £3242 (for a mate) Data Protection Act letter sent and 5 years of statements sent out 20/7/06

 

Capital One - Data Protection Act letter sent 21/7/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found a very helpful post by robertxc here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/8605-ally_bally-bos-10-700-a.html?highlight=ordinary+action (about half way down)

 

This is exactly what I was looking for!

 

Maybe should be added to the FAQ's as it is hard to find any information on ordinary actions on this site.

Bank of Scotland 1st claim - £513 settled in full after court proceedings

 

Bank of Scotland 2nd claim - £361 + interest LBA sent 17/7/06

 

Bank of Scotland claiming £3242 (for a mate) Data Protection Act letter sent and 5 years of statements sent out 20/7/06

 

Capital One - Data Protection Act letter sent 21/7/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...