Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Irishad1 versus RBS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, just calculated that the RBS have charged me £1,137.18 of my hard earned money over the past few years!

 

Sending my letter this weekend to request refund of these charges!

 

wish me luck.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----------------------------------

£1,137.18 RBS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

just stick to your timetable and follow up with the second letter 14 days after the first one!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby

Calendar days :D

Also I think you should keep to one thread. The mods will merge them for you.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a reply to my "request for payment of charges letter"

 

Essentially the response was:

"We believe that our charges are fair, reasonable and transparent. We consider that the amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with us and our published tariff, which we are satisfied, complies with all applicable laws and regulations. We are also committed to ensuring the transparency of the information that we give to our customers about the operation of our products.

We have considered and responded to the Office of Fair Trading’s statement of 5th April 2006. We do not accept the Office of Fair Trading’s findings in relation to credit card fees. We are concerned that the Office of Fair Trading has publicly called into question the setting of charges applied to other products, including current accounts. The Office of Fair Trading has restricted its investigation to credit cards and made no attempt to consult with RBS or the industry in relation to other, entirely different products.

Consequently, against that background, we must differ with the views expressed in your letter.

Again, thank you for taking the time and trouble to write."

Deputy Branch Manager.

So I am proceeding with my Letter Before Action!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

I opened my account in Edinburgh, when I was at university. Since then I have moved to England and closed my account. I have sent all my initial letters to my old Edinburgh branch, but if I have heard nothing by the end of this week I have to start court action.

 

Can I now start court action in England using a different branch address for RBS or using a head office address?

 

Please can someone advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby

Hi there. Yes, you're living in England and you have to give an English address for the bank if using MCOL. If you look at the top of this forum there's a thread called RBS contact details - there's lots of addresses there including this one

 

KAY STANBRIDGE

RBS LITIGATION

1 PRINCESS STREET

LONDON

EC2R 8PB

 

Hope that helps :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the address below:

Royal Bank of Scotland

1 PRINCESS STREET

LONDON

EC2R 8PB

 

My claim was for £1,032 of charges and £49.18 for interest on penalties.

 

With the 8% interest this took it to a total of £1,298.59.

 

Moneyclaim charged a £120 fee - which was automatically added to the claim.

 

Hope this helps you out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey,

 

Have had an Acknowledgment of Service reply on MoneyClaim.

 

Cobbetts have been assigned by RBS to look after the case.

 

Just been reading the "Judges Request" Thread - very interesting - seems that this is the way RBS are tackling the defences now.

 

Have we got a template for answering cobbetts questions - or is it still at the trial and error stage as on "Judges Request?"

 

IrishAd1

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judges request thread is an exception rather than the norm, all other cases have followed a very similar pattern up to now, if you read around the RBS forum draft replies are there.

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Irishlad....that letter they sent you about their charges being " resonable,fair and transparent" is EXACTLY the samr responce i got from them!Heres me thinking they had taken the trouble to reply when it was just a standard template...swines.They have untill Saturday 26th to respond ,then my LBA goes out.Hope we are both lucky!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just received my standard issue Cobbetts defence letter.

 

And at the last hour - quelle surprise!

 

Sounds very similar to judges thread - so I am going to use the advice contained there.

 

I have until the 28th September to reply.

 

Any advice on how to handle this letter would be gratefully received!

 

The letter talks about UCTA giving specific reasons to back up the allegation under UCTA!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

I have been away with work so haven’t been able to update on my progress in a while – have had a bit of progress and need some advice.

I received the following letter from Cobbetts on the 12th October.

“Our client considers that your challenge to its charges would fail in Court. Our client believes that its charges are fair, reasonable and transparent. It considers that the amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with it and its published tariff, which it is satisfied complies with all applicable laws and regulations. Our client is also committed to ensuring the transparency of the information that it gives to its customers about the operation of its products. As such, our client does not believe that your claim has any prospect of succeeding.

However, as a gesture of goodwill and strictly on the basis that our client rejects any liability to you, it is willing to offer you a goodwill payment of £800.

Acceptance by you of this goodwill payment will be in full and final settlement of your claim against our client and strictly on the basis that:-

1 you agree not to disclose to any third party the fact of, or any details relating to, this payment:

2 you write to the court withdrawing your claim.

Whilst this letter is written without prejudice save as to costs, in the event that you decline this offer, we will draw this letter to the Court’s attention on the basis that we hold the fim view that this offer is entirely reasonable in the circumstances. This offer will remain open for 7 days until Friday, 20 October 2006.”

I replied with:

“Further to your letter of 12th October 2006, I am writing to inform you that I will NOT be accepting your clients offer of £800 in full and final settlement of the above claim but I will accept the offer as an interim payment and I will be pursuing the rest through the courts. If your client believes that their charges are fair, reasonable and transparent as stated in your letter then it will not be a problem for them to disclose to the courts how the charges are calculated.

I am also unwilling to agree to the specific terms and conditions you have added to this, namely:

 

1. Not to disclose to any third party the fact of, or any details relating to, this payment;

2. To withdraw my claim;

3. That this payment of £800 is a full and final settlement of the claim.

Furthermore I am requesting a list of the charges that your client is willing to refund by way of the £800 payment so that I can compare it with the schedule of charges that I have previously sent to you.

The legal advice, which I have sought, has confirmed I will be entitled to the entirety of my claim of £1489.76 to date.

(£1,088.00 + £49.18 interest on penalties + £232.58 8% interest allowed by the courts + £120 court costs).

I look forward to receiving a cheque for the interim payment of £800, along with the breakdown from your client of which charges they relate to.”

So far I have received no response from Cobbetts. Is there some further action I should take? Am I supposed to make the court aware of their offer and my acceptance as an interim payment?

On the 1st Novmber, I received a confirmation that my case has been allocated to the small claims court and a hearing date has been set for the 31st Jan 2007, and should take no longer than 1 hour.

The Court order reads as follows:

“Upon reading the documents filed and of the Court’s own motion

It is ordered that:

1. This claim is allocated to the Small Claims Track.

2. The Claimant shall by [28 days] file and serve:

(a) A schedule setting out each charge repayment of which is sought, showing the date, amount, and alleged reason (if any) for that charge being made;

(b) Copies of any statement or other document relied upon as showing that each and every charge has been made;

© A statement of his evidence, if such is to be relied upon as tending to show that the alleged charges have been made, or that they are irrecoverable as penalties.

If the Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order.

3. The Defendant shall by [56 days] file and serve a response to the Claimant’s schedule, stating in respect of each item claimed:

(a) Pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made, producing a copy of the contractual document relied upon;

(b) Whether such charge is accepted to be a penalty, and if not, why not;

© If such charge is alleged to be a pre-estimate of the Defendant’s loss incurred by the Claimant’s actions (whether or not such action is to be treated as a breach of the contract between the parties), all facts and matters intended to be relied upon as showing that such is a proper estimate of such loss, and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to what the true cost of dealing with the matter was.

If the Defendant fails to comply with this order, the Defence will be struck out without further order.

4. Decided cases and other legal materials should not be filed, but brought to the hearing with additional copies for the Court and the opposing party.

5. List for hearing next available date after 10 weeks, time estimate 1 hour, reserved to District Judge Atkinson.

This Order has been made by the court of its own initiative, without hearing the parties or giving them an opportunity to make representations. Any party affected by the order may apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed. Such an application must be made not more than 7 days after the date on which the order was served on the party making the application.”

In terms of the actions that I need to take, can someone advise:

 

1 Does File and Serve mean that I send a copy to the court and a copy to Cobbetts?

2 My schedule of charges and a copy of my bank statements should cover the courts first two requirements, but I am a little confused as to what I should use for the third: “A statement of evidence, if such is to be relied upon as tending to show that the alleged charges have been made, or that they are irrecoverable as penalties.”

Should this be acceptable, then it looks like it is up to our friends at Cobbetts to supply all information intended to be relied upon to showing that RBS’s charges are a proper estimate of such loss, and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to what the true cost of dealing with the matter was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Success!!

 

I received a cheque for £1,589 from RBS via Cobbetts.

 

Apparantly they still say I don't have a case but the cost of going to court outweighs the amount of money I was asking for and it is simple financials.

 

Either way - it's a success!

 

Thanks everyone for their help and advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...