Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver.  (Although earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.  I don't clearly understand it, but legal advice was something to do with the role the receiver has acting as an agent for the borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against the receiver ???).  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate app for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Venture Photographers - Rip Off


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4837 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just been ripped off.

In August 2008, I went to Ventures Photographers in greenwich london with my family to take pictures based on thier £25 studio offer. After the photo shot I was compelled to buy a £675 set of photographs. they used unimaginable sales schemes, infact forgot about the £25 offer. I agreed and paid but called up 24 hours later over the weekend. But vehemently refused after several haggling, they agreed to allow me take a £375 set.

 

Now its 3 months later, i have paid £375, made several calls, left messages, no one has contacted me.

Called thier help line, they could offer me no help and still refered me back to the greenwich studio.

At this point I am fed up and would like to get my money back since they do not want to give me the photographs I paid for..

 

What do I do? Can I get help?

Edited by Mr lex
Removed link
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well - it all boils down to how you paid. The fact there was a vanishing special offer, or price-elastic photo-shoot, your complaint will be that you paid for a service that was not supplied.

 

If you paid by Visa Debit or a credit card, lucky old you - you can simply tell the CC that you've never received the goods as promised and are looking to them for your money back. If you paid by a non-Visa debit, cheque or cash, your only recourse is to send a letter before action and pursue them for a refund after giving them - say, 28 days - to supply your order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Venture - which is a Kodak franchise, operates in much the same way as a number of other portrait photography setups - they make their money through sales of prints and framing/mounting. Unlike some of the others, Venture's quality is usually pretty good, especially if you like the contemporary style - hi-key manipulated images.

 

Their whole operation is aimed at persuading customers to pay a lot for images; the 'free' studio session, the comfortably furnished viewing room with huge plasma screen, and so on. They use US-style selling techniques, but ultimately it's for the customer to decide whether or not to buy - and to shop around and/or get quotes before committing.

 

However, in this case, where Venture seem to have failed to supply goods that have been paid for, there's another option in addition to the ones described above - Trading Standards. Whilst they are generally hopeless with DCAs, most are very good at dealing with this sort of situation; they may even be aware of the Olan Mills fiasco of 2006.

Link to post
Share on other sites

was very unimpressed with venture...

 

tho to say i still have the £25 photo on my desk, reframed as the origional frame was very poor quality

 

they did lie to me on multiple occasions

 

saying that the offer (stand) was only on this weekend, over a year later its still there.

 

been that long i cant remember what the other lies were but there were at least 2 more...

 

the photos were well done but in many cases were spoilt by the editing, and the frame, dvd or album were massivly over priced with the cheapest being over £300.

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

we had a massive problem with venture. my wife was bought one of the £125 vouchers (actual cost £25) plus £75 extra vouchers by colleaugues at work for her birthday.

 

we have used venture before so knew how dear they were and we had sworn never to use them again, however when the vouchers were bought for us we had to.

 

we went for the sitting and then went back the week later to view. we had every intention of just having a 10 x 8 framed photo at a cost of £155. we knew from the £125 voucher that £50 had gone towards the sitting so it left us £75 from that and the extra £75 we had. in effect putting £5 cash towards the 10 x 8 would be all.

 

venture said we couldnt do this as the £75 from the promotional voucher could only be used on a wall display and not a desk display. the cheapest wall display was £300 which we didnt want to pay. we ended up having to forget about the £75 from the promotional voucher and use the £75 extra voucher to put towards a 8 x 6 photo and an extra £20 cash.

 

when we left i read through the small print and discovered it did not say this anywhere so i rang head office and got through to the customer relations executive, chris woods. i explained and when he got back to me after a few days he agreed there had been a mistake and it would be corrected. we had several problems getting the 10 x 8 photo from the store as they though they were right still.

 

ater a few weeks of endless phone calls and getting owhere even though the exec at head office had agreed with us, i threatened them with trading standards and the manchester evening news paper.

 

they promised to post the pic to us that day, but never did. i gave them a week to sort it and it still didnt arrive. i then phoned the store and then chris woods minutes later telling them that i did not want the photo any more and i wanted a full refund of the total £100 my wifes work had paid for the vouchers so we could go elsewhere for our photos. again threatening them that if the money was not behind my dor by 5pm that day i would continue with contacting the media.

 

that day a cheque did arive for £100 but when banked it had been cancelled!

 

one last try and told them if the cash wasnt behind my door when i got home that was it. when i got home the pic was there with a free one also for the inconvenience, this had been posted with royal mail. later on a manager from the store turned up at my door and handed me an envelope containing £100 but ran off down the road into a taxi before i could even say anything.

 

so all in all not a bad deal in the end - 2 photos, the 10 x 8 we wanted, a free 8 x 6 and full refund - really could have done without te headaches though!!!!

 

chris woods head office customer relations executive - 01606 558854 if you to want a headache!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Completely agree!! this will make you laugh though, maybe

 

went for a sitting in April 2007 went back a review to be told it would be £1000 plus for a 10 photo album we said we would think about. a few weeks later we had a finance agreement come through so my husband told them where to go. roll on to 2009 for a courier to turn up with said photos. stunned i took them in. my husband came home and immediately called them to complain quite aggresively and was told the agreement would be cancelled. we still have the photos and no money paid out bargain !! one in the eye for the greedy photographers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Yorklass2009 - I assume that was the York branch you were talking about? We were approached in Morrisons; I always walk straight past anyone trying to approach me in supermarkets but my girlfriend was interested so I left her to it. The overly camp chap selling it gave the impression that she could have the digital images in exchange for the voucher for reproduction on a website and although this turned out to be a lie, they have honoured it. The pre-session period was annoying as they kept wanting to rope in all the family and make it 'fun', but we wanted photos, not fun.

 

We'd done a bit of research beforehand and knew they were a very expensive company, so we went to the viewing fully prepared to turn them down. As the viewing started some of the shots were pretty rubbish, but as it went on they got better and I have to say that some of the shots are £1000's worth and it didn't take hard sell to make us seriously consider spending some money (even though some of their packages represent a full years wages for us) - the quality of the product did that for us. The advantage of a company that makes such large margins is that you have masses of bargaining power.

 

Venture also use images as part of their advertising and although they own the copyright, they still need your permission to use the images, so if they ask you that gives you even more buying power. We ended up buying a set of display images but we also got the cost of the voucher refunded, the voucher print, a digital album and copyright license for free. If they had been poor images, they wouldn't have got anything and without the extras we'd have happily walked away with a cheap print in a naff frame and they'd have been out of pocket.

 

Be prepared, know their prices and give them the hardsell - if you want basic, cheap photos, you won't get them from Venture but for some stunning shots give them the hard sell and they will sell to you, because that's how they make money. They'll loose money on £25 for at least two hours (despite the sessions for viewing and studio being booked for an hour we have been at least three) so they have to sell you something to make money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was approaced a few weeks before Christmas by a woman selling venture gift vouchers, i had been thinking about having a family picture took of myself and my 4 kids and i mentioned that my mum wanted a photo of all her 10 grandchildren, so she perked up with "well we are offering 2 vouchers for £35, each voucher entitles you to an hour photo session and a one free print" i thought this was a great deal and bought right away. From boxing day till new years day we had one of my husbands children staying with us, we only see a few times a year as they live far away so we thought it would be nice to have a picture of all 5 kids. i rang venture to arrange a session naming all 5 kids. Unfortunately my youngest boy and myself came down with a nast flu and we had to cancel. My mum, my sisters, my brother, my self and 10 kids went to a different studio last week (i don't live near my family) it was a lovely day and went well. Then i came home and rearranged my own session for this coming sunday. Today the photographer called me just to "introduce herself" she asked if she could confirm the names of my 5 kids at which point i informed her that one of the kids was not mine and he would not be attending..the responce i got has shocked and insulted me! She told me that my husband and his kids MUST attend to validate the voucher, it is a FULL FAMILY voucher. I told her that his kids live far away and we don't see them, i told her that he is not the father to my kids so i just want myself and MY children, they said this is not possible! We have a complicated family, having seperate children and this is a very common situation in 2011! how can i be turned away for having a different kind of family..are they allowed to do this? I paid for a voucher and at the time told the woman that it was myself and my kids..she never told me that i had to take my whole family! Also yes their prices are astronomical for £95 you get a 7x5 print they go all the way up to £3500...If you want 10 images on a memory stick you have to fork out £600

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...