Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Expedia pre authorisation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2040 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Went onto expedia.co.uk this morning to try and book a holiday to Barcelona (flights + hotel). Tried to pay one grand on debit card (maestro).

The transaction did not complete - expedia have a problem getting live flight information from the airline i was flying with. ended up buying flights direct and getting hotel from expedia (paid for on credit card)

Went onto my online banking to find that i was one thousand pounds down but there was no account of it. Rang the bank who informed me that expedia had pre authorised the funds. They gave me an authorisation code to go back to Expedia with which i did, only to be told it will take altlease 3 days before the funds are released. Its less than a week until i fly!

So now i have no money to go shopping for the holiday and im worried i wont even have the money whilst im actually there.

Rang Expedia back to speak to the customer services manager. A guy called Gareth Quigley based in Ireland. He was pleasant enough but absolutely useless from an action point of view. Basically said nothing he could do, there was no one else that would be able to do anything, and that Id have to just wait. Made no attempt to compensate me in any way or even make a goodwill gesture.

Im absolutely shocked at how they can do this with no warning that they pre authorise the funds and that there could be a hold on the funds if their systems fail during the processing, as happened here.

Rang my bank hoping they could cancel the auth. NatWest are usually really good with customer service, they spoke to their authorisation centre who said it was out of their control. Whether true or not, its still Expedia's mistake that im suffering for.

 

Im just so angry that they do not give a toss about what they have done and how it has impacted me and my holiday. I cant even afford to buy a camera now. This is the holiday business they are in - synonomous with stress free relaxation. The irony.

 

I have seen a similar post on this forum called "Expedia have swallowed my money for 4 days"

 

I will contact that author but i wanted to know if anyone has any specific advice that will help me. I just want something in the way of a token gesture of their sincere apology for the stress and inconvenience they have caused me and the sacrifice i am going to have to make.

 

Thanks in advance for your help

Billy

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have had exactly the same issue as I had Billy - the flights!

 

In my case I got "lucky" in that after half a dozen calls to the customer service people we got a decent chap who did all he could to assist. It helped that my wife spent ages on the phone to him and got chatting and built a good dialogue with him. Full details here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/holiday-companies/111195-expedia-have-swallowed-my.html

 

For all that and the free holiday, I have never and will never ever use Expedia again. The more people realise how they operate and the risks involved the better.

 

The problem for your bank is they have authorised that money and they can not then unauthorise it. If the bank could what's the point to anyone of them authorising in the first place? My beef is with Expedia who can get authorisation in an instant from the bank but then the Expedia systems have no means to unauthorise the money when it goes wrong. All that happens is they don't take the money and the auth codes expire after 3 days.

 

Only suggestion I have for you and anyone is make a pain in the ass of yourself by telephone. Write down detailed notes on times of calls, length of call and who you spoke to - maybe mention that your writing to Caroline Cartellieri and considering BBC Watchdog or the Sunday Times Money matters.

 

Then if all else fails write to the head women :- Caroline Cartellieri who is the CEO of expedia UK. The address is

 

Expedia.com Limited

7 Soho Square

London

W1D 3QB

 

Hope your able to enjoy your holiday

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

as i was an expedia employe in customer services (until recently leaving, as expedia is currently in the process of cutting 200 + jobs to open them in india), i do understand the process that happens with a pre authorisation, as soon as we learn of the pre authorisation and are contacted by the customer with the pre authorisation, expedia cannot access the money as it has been pre auth'ed it goes to a merchant banking account (think limbo), the customers bank does not have it and neither does expedia, if calling on the phone to book the travel advisor will tell you of this and get you to notify your bank, hopefully you get the irish office, as they know the expedia system fully inside out as they have been with expedia for 6 years, unlike the two newly opened contact centers (who will promise the customer everything they require especially if it cannot be done or on offer through expedia - i know as have had to mop up their mess on several occasions - thanks sighthill and bangalore expedia franchises!) we then automatically fax the bank telling them we have not accepted the funds and do not hold them, the bank then credits the money back into the customers account which thanks to the banks takes up to 5 days - and yes those are working days, 9-5 mon-fri, whereas our working days at expedia are 24hours a day 365 days a year! if WE could put the money instantly into customers bank accounts WE would, at the end of the day its a lot easier than having someone scream down the phone to you untill it has been put back into the account up to 5 WORKING days later, thank you banking system, and thank you expedia for making so many people in my area jobless in the current economic climate, purely to save a few pennies in your billion dollar global company!! it sure wont be worth it in the long run with the amount of write-off's from the new centers thanks to their mistakes.

 

thomas cook is the way foward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A pre auth isn't as simple as that.

 

Most banks that take 5 working days for the money to drop back simply don't do it for data protection reasons. Much like an expedia agent wouldn't touch an account holders account without speaking to the account first.

 

A lot of banks look past this and drop the money back in straight away though when they get confirmation it won't be taken.

 

Anyway, Expedia could easily introduce a system whereby an agent can simply cancel a pre auth at the click of a button... t'wud be too simple for them though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I tried to book a multi-destination flight from London Heathrow to New York, New York to Las Vegas and Las Vegas to London Heathrow. I went through the booking process online, submitted my card details and was then told that my order could not be processed due to one of the flights not being available any more. I tried with a different flight, and the same thing happened. I rang Irene in customer services department and she informed me a block had been placed on my debit card. I therefore rang LloydsTSB my card provider, who told me that in fact Expedia had taken the money for these flights out of my account. I rang Expedia back to be told that my flights had not been booked, and when I enquired about the money they told me they had requested no money, and nothing had been booked. A gentleman in customer services then gave me an authorisation code to give to the bank, that supposedly would release the earmarked funds on my account. I rang back the bank who told that what this man had told me was simply not correct. The bank had no access to earmarked funds, and regardless of any “authorisation code” could not release any earmarked funds. This gentleman had lied to me. I was then told by my bank, that in order for them to have an authorisation number and be able to release this money, they must have a record of my booking. So I called back expedia who ensured me that if I tried again through one of their representatives it would go through (with the previous money being returned in no more than 3 hours which the bank have since told me is a minimum of 72 hrs), so I tried it again and surprise surprise it happened again (which apparently is a 1/17000 chance for it to happen once, let alone twice) (I also hasten to mention that the representative herself attempted to book the holiday whilst not on the phone to me, and entered the wrong flight dates, which would have cost me £1431.54 if they had gone through!). At 9pm at night (nine hours after I started my conversations) I was finally assured that a manager would call me the next day.

The following day obviously no call came and after arguing for 2 hours I am now £3000 down and have only been offered a £50 voucher! I've finally got through to a person called Kevin Hayward who actually seemed to be helping until he told me he would call me back after 10 minutes (it's currently an hour later and still no call).

 

UPDATE: After a 3rd day of phone calls, Kevin offered me £140 to cover my expenses (phone calls, loss of earnings etc.), a £200 expedia voucher credited to my account, and £300 compensation directly into my bank account.

 

As you can see it’s definitely worth persevering. Don’t give up, just keep calling!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 years later...

I went searching on google to see if anyone has had the same experience as me and low and behold I found this forum and looks like expedia hasn't changed a bit! Booked $5000 trip through expedia only to find a preauthorisation amount of $5000 taken from my credit card, plus the actual cost of the trip! So I have been missing $10000 from my credit card for 17 days and I ring up expedia and say hello my preauthorisation has never dropped off. All I get is a so sorry I will contact your bank and request the preauthorisation be dropped off. 2 days later im still waiting and hoping my funds will clear. What a ridiculious system expedia, don't charge customers twice for one transaction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...