Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would have thought so but I'm no lawyer. What did the one that you spoke to say? You could also google about how/when a will trust is set up to get more of an idea before you speak to the original lawyer. HB
    • While I am waiting for the original solicitor to ring back about the will can I ask. After my dad passed they were informed about this an released a copy of the will to me and my brother, should they have set the trust up then as they were informed of his passing?   Thanks again
    • .. A tired little trump simply run out of wind ..  for a little while ...
    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Out of times are going to cost £35 from monday week


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5690 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If by any chance you are one of these people who for whatever reason have recieved a bailiff visit and are in the process of filing a late stat dec you have till monday week to file free of charge. After this there will be a fee of £35 per out of time. If this is refused then a n224 application to set aside will cost a further £75. however if you are on is/jsa/child tax then this should not affect you.

 

If you wish to appeal against the registration with the Court

If a correctly completed Statutory Declaration is filed with the TEC within 36 days of registration, the Court registration will be revoked (cancelled). This does not cancel the original penalty charge. The matter is referred back to the local authority to decide what action they wish to take next.

If you are unsure of the date of registration you can contact the TEC on 0845 7045007 and request this. If you do not have the Statutory Declaration (Form PE3) a further form can be sent by email, fax, post or you can use the Forms link below.

Another option would be to request an extension of the time allowable for you to file the Statutory Declaration with the TEC. A maximum time period of four weeks can be obtained. Please note all time extensions must be submitted to the TEC in writing (either by post/email/fax) prior to the expiry of the 36 day time scale for filing.

Please find our contact details via the following link - Contact Us.

If you are out of time to file a Statutory Declaration

For the relevant forms to make an application to file a Statutory Declaration out of time (PE2 & PE3) please see the forms link at the bottom of this page.

There is no prescribed time limit in which you can apply to file the Statutory Declaration out of time. On receipt of an acceptable application the Traffic Enforcement Centre will notify the Local Authority concerned and give them 19 working days to either accept or reject the application.

If the Local Authority accepts the application it will be treated as an in time Statutory Declaration and the Court registration will be revoked (cancelled). The matter is referred back to the Local Authority to decide what action they wish to take next.

If the Local Authority rejects the application, it will be referred to a senior officer of the Court at the TEC. This is for an impartial decision on whether the application should be granted or refused. Both parties will be informed of the result.

Following the decision by the Court officer, either party may apply, within 14 days, to have that decision set aside.

The relevant form (N244) and guidance notes to assist can be obtained from the TEC. If this application is accepted then the case will be transferred to the respondent's local County Court and a District Judge will review the case.

The following link provides information on the most frequently asked questions received by the TEC Helpdesk.

 

STOP PRESS

Please be aware that with effect from 1st October 2008, the following fees will be introduced:

£35.00 for all Out of Time Statutory Declarations or Witness Statements (PE2 or TE7)

£75.00 for an application to set aside a Court Officer's Order (Form N244)

Forms: Statutory Declaration and Application to file the Statutory Declaration out of time

Forms to complete to apply against registration of:

Congestion Charges / Bus Lanes / Parking / Moving Traffic contraventions.

or:

Vehicle Emission contraventions (only)

Edited by letsmakeamark

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...