Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Message to Lloyds and HBOS employees


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4924 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Maybe as many as 40,000 of you may soon lose your jobs.

 

If you have any interesting stories relating to any kind of skullduggery or other iniquity whcih has taken place within your organisation, maybe now is the time to consider to whom your loyalties lie.

 

We can put you in contact with radio and TV or print journalists who will be happy to listen to your story in confidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

bumping

Beck

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. one is by the Sword. The other is by Debt."

 

Barclaycard PPI Refund £4300:whoo:

Barclaycard = Mexican Stand Off

 

TSB = Mexican Stand Off

 

Santander = :mad2: MungyPup is coming to get yahh :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Indeed and they (Lloyds) cut the pension pot which will effect the average worker more while they carry on paying fat bonuses to the higher paid which will not be effected by any pension cut.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hmmn... the £11bn loss is equivalent to about 2 years profits at 2007 levels in HBOS and the organisation was over 300 years old.....

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In case it hasn't filtered through - HBOS have finally dumped a shed load of their admin staff right in it by announcing 850 job losses in one town where they are one of the key employers locally.

 

Needless to say, some of the admin jobs will be going overseas.

 

Whilst I have nothing decent to say about the bankers, it is as usual the people on the lower end of the pecking order who are being given the boot, rather than the tossers at the top who stuffed an entire nation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Ex HBOS Financial Adviser here.....aaagh I here you all say but that's were life took me. The last 2-3 years were a nightmare working under a collection of various levels of staff members all under severe pressure due to the increasing bonus culture. If you failed to do your bit towards branch targets then 'Performance Management' quickly arrives.

 

I have many experiences of behaviours and indeed falsifications by lots of different individuals basically trying to de-fraud banks at the expense of customers to achieve bonuses...pure greed!

 

I was frustrated by the lack of supervision/risk control and for the honest group of advisers that I associated with, the pressure was brought about by being ranked against dishonest employees. Line managers/Regional managers and I suspect higher levels turning a blind eye to the shennanigans happening at branch level and beyond. I heard of several more significant shennanigans at corporate level too but basically not dealt with due to inadequate risk control/ineffective management.

 

I left the bank and all in all enjoyed working for Bank of Scotland. The merger with the Haliban was the downfall in my opinion because as time went on they integrated the sales culture throughout the Bank. Ultimately, they 'overtraded' and became bankrupt until the Government bailed them out.

 

Glad to be out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi Tonymacaroni

I realize it's been a while since your post but I was surfing around the site and I wondered whether you had any knowledge of the pressure put on sales people at Halifax to sell loans. I'm keen to know what triggered Sales to call someone to offer a loan. What tactics they would use to sell a loan and whether you think appropriate checks were made on the ability to repay? What kind of incentives or rewards did sales or branch staff get for selling inappropriate products? I'm sure this still goes on despite the recent financial crisis. They continue to induldge in irresponsible and unfair behaviour. It may now be more with regard to investments than loans. Ridiculous "fee" deduction for selling an inappropriate product from a different area of the group etc. I have so many horror stories from friends and relatives particularly from Halifax but Barclays and others. I don't believe the banks have been punished adequately. I don't trust banks at all. I tell as many people as I can to be very very wary when dealing with them. They are not your friends, they are not there to help or advise but merely to make money from you. Do not rely on their "advice" - it is for their advantage only. Many people are suffering severe financial detriment because of poor sales practices.

Look forward to hearing your thoughts. SJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...