Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Is it worth trying to talk to them first? (RBS)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just found out about the possibility of reclaiming charges, and think I could be owed thousands.

 

But, I like my bank and apart from the charges (which, while excessive, to be fair they have only been incurred in the first place through my spending) I've had a good relationship with them, as has my mother who also banks at my branch. So I don't want to fall out with them or move to another bank.

 

I was wondering if phoning your personal banker about reclaiming charges before sending out letters is a) worthwhile, and b) has borne any fruit for people, as I don't want to start the ball rolling the more official way if there's a chance of negotiating with them verbally first.

 

Help appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, talk me through this... They have unlawfully taken thousands in bank charges from you, but since it was your fault you overspent, and you didn't kick up a fuss about them helping themselves to your money, that makes it a good relationship with them?

 

Newsflash: The "good" relationship is solely due to your meekly paying up, and having enough money to pay up. The experience of thousands on this forum is that the moment the money dried up, the goodwill on the banks' behalf evaporated like morning dew on a hot summer day.

 

2nd newsflash: They are likely to turn quite mean when you refuse to play by their rules.

 

But if you really think that you'll get your thousands back by talking nicely to them, why not? Please call them. If it works, PLEASE come back and tell us, we're always looking for ways to make life easier for people here. And to be fair, we have had people gettign 1 or 2 charges back with a phone call. Thousands, never to my knowledge. Would be nice, though. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does depend on what bank charges they owe you. Anecdotal evidence on this forum is that if you unfair penalty charges are less than £100, then yes, a 'phone call often, but not always, does the trick.

 

Any amount over this, then don't even waste your breath. They will have you calling all round the country, with promises to call you back, and leaving you VERY frustrated.

 

See the steps I took to get my bank charges back.

Spiceskull v HSBC.

Thank you Consumer Action Group.

Read my blog.

 

Collage001.gif

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

I called Capital One and got a refund of over £300, but I did say I was a Mod for CAG and they said Okay, we cant be bothered to argue.

 

Saying that capital one do pay up easily in comparison to the banks.

 

its unlikely but worth a try...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no doubt that they "launch in" when they are unhappy with you, why would you do anything different to them? No matter what sort of relationship you have with your bank it all comes down to the fact that the charges are illegal. Wether you decide to claim them all back or not is up to you.

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

Yes I was on the LBA stage before phoning Capital One.

 

Mostly its recommended you dont call at all, but I had leverage so I did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarah-Jane,

you make it sound like you are about to press the big red button on the Bank. You are not! The letters merely set out your underlying disappointment in their actions. I find that I don't even get a letter nowadays, I just log on to digital banking and the charges have been applied, £90 for referrals and £100's for unpaid DDs every month. I, personally, am fed up with losing money hand over fist when I worked hard to get it in the first place. I have been with the RBS since 1990 and my father was with them for ages before that, up until recently I thought I had a 'good relationship' with them until I started getting multiple charges, not getting phonecalls returned to try and sort this out, loans to cover charges and overdrafts, bigger overdrafts.....then one day you have an epiphany, what would have happened if these charges had not been applied, well, I for one believe that I am 'sensible' with my spending and do not go out to try and incurr charges but live within my means(-ish). I am not doing so because of £1000s of charges.

You are not being rude and should not expect to get 'kicked' out of the Branch, although you may wish to set up another account elsewhere just in case. It is your money and you are merely asking, in a pleasant, direct manner, giving them time to answer and acting within the law. Sod them!:p

Big Col:p

RBS LBA 20/06/06. WON - 21/10/06

MBNA(1)-Start-20/06/06, Claim-£250, 15/8 - Winner!!

MBNA Virgin(2)-Start-20/06/06, Claim £100, 15/8 - Winner!!

BoS MCard Data Protection Act Sent 20/06/06 - WON 16/10/06

Green On!

If the post/advice helps, pse click on the scales!! :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have taken lots of charges from you, I would screw them for every penny. This bank does not understand the word 'nice' as I discovered. This bank has a turnover of over £8 billion in profit, mugging customers like ourselves. It is a greedy bank that needs to be destroyed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...