Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marlin claimform - HSBC OD debt ****SETTLED VIA MEDIATION****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have today received a letter from Marlin saying

 

We give you notive that on 18 July 2008 Pheonix Recoveries (UK) Limited S.a.r.l, acting in the name and on behalf of its Compartoment 'Potomac Recoveries' by an assigment acquired all rights, in, to and under your above account and become the creditor to whom you owe the current outstanding balance of £XXXX

 

Marlin Financial remains insructed to adminisiter your account and any legal action already taken against you will be continued in the name of the creditor. You should contact Marlin immediately so that we can agree payment terms with you.

 

 

It also goes on to say the usual drivel about the data protection act and not to ignore this letter.

 

I CCA'd Marlin in April, I think it was, but definately around that time (have all the copies) and never heard anything back. We have still been paying through our DMP, but just wanted the constant calls and threats of a CO so CCA'd them.

 

The question is, do I ignore this and see what happens, did think at first that they had found the CCA.

 

Help please, we are continuing to make affordable payments and will do so for the forseeable future

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Send them this by recorded

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**.

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore

 

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

These limits have expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

BLAH

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

we have been still paying, so they really have no reason to want to talk to us about arrangments. They havent rang or written once since getting the CCA request, although the company that pheonix was acting on behalf of last time was Tesserra or something like that, now its Potomac.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received the same letter from Marlin after having sent a request for the CCA back in May with nothing being received.

 

I assume I am correct in thinking that a credit card is subject to the CCA, but is a bank account also subject to it as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Billybig, I think they must just try it on every so often. An 0overdraft if I have understood rightly isnt subject to a CCA, but I did send them one. I havent had any contact from them since sending the CCA request, until I got letters last week saying that another potomac had taken it over. I am assuming for some reason they have just changed names from Pheonix to Potomac.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marlin will back off if you push hard enough. Make sure you mark your letter 'Complaint' and do send it at least recorded - they are notorious for not receiving letters, court forms, .... In fact, the only thing of mine that they did admit to receiving (despite signing for all the correspondence) was the default judgement.

 

billybig, credit cards are indeed subject to the CCA, but overdrafts are a bit tricky. They are not subject to the same rules about prescribed terms etc, so a CCA request is probably a waste of time. However, if you do a SAR (to the original creditor) and ask for absolutely everything, there should be some reference to a letter you should have been sent detailing the terms of any overdraft. The rules about default notices and notices of assignment still apply though.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It annoys me that my payments have been sufficient for the last 6 months but again they just have decided to push. I full intend on keeping up my payments, but just want to be the one in control, if they dont provide the necessary documents. Eventually they may just make me fed up and I may just stop making the payments, then they will actually have a reason to send threatograms (although not a legal one, if no CCA)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have often actually wished that one of these DCAs would take me to court, enforceable agreement or not. My credit file is already trashed so a CCJ wouldn't actually do much harm, but the benefit would be that if they wanted an increased payment they would have to go to court to get it, so hopefully no more threatograms or harassment.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should provide a full statement of account as well as a copy of the agreement, and this should show why the balance hasn't reduced.

 

Alternatively, you could write demanding to know why the balance has increased and stating that, as it appears payments made are not being credited to the account, you are suspending payment until the problem is resolved.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do as Reallymadwoman suggests, and add an invoice to the letter asking for £50 for legal and secretarial services, stating if the invoice is not paid in 14 days immediate legal proceedings will take place.... fight them with their own twisted logic. Your balance should have gone down if you are paying regularly, they are CHOOSING not to register it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No popint in lookingfor any logic from Marlin since they add costs arbitrarily and seem to think a CCA request is an optional duty for them. They rarely show one and so I would be reluctant to continue payments that are not being countwd against your purported debt in the absence of their cooperation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have received another letter from Marlin

 

Basically saying that they cant obtain the CCA and they hope this isnt an inconvenience to me!!!

 

Also point out the High Court Judgement that means there is no penalty for them being unable to supply the CCA. The tell me that I am still liable and they can take any enforcement action. They go on to ask me to make some payment proposals.

 

We have been paying them all along via a DMP, although our balance has gone up. I only CCA'd them cos they were threatening a CO.

 

I intend on continuing the payments but wonder what to do now.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

MY view is that since they cannot supply a CCA you maybe best to just stop paying them, they are indefault of your CCA and SAr requests and obviously the account is in dispute, they are not crediting your payments, and contrary to regs about acounts in dispute, they are adding charges.

 

Send one of the site letters (I,m sure someone will know which one and can post a link) and see what hapens. NO CCA- NO ENFORCEMENT

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

Just having a quick read and thought I'd let you know that Marlin are trying the same trick with me. The "recent ruling" they are referring to is the Rankine case.

 

Search on here under Rankine and you'll find a really good response letter which someone has drawn up. I sent it today..

 

Marlin will argue that because you are on DMP, your account(s) have been terminated which they will tell you means that the alleged precedent set by Rankine will be upheld and hence the debt is enforceable at law.

 

The only people who could have terminated your agreement is the OC so you would have been told about it if this was the case. Marlin told me that proof of the termination of the agreement is that defaults have been registered on the accounts in question. I have put a quick thread on here just to see if anyone can shed any light on that point but I feel it to be a bluff.

 

I'll let you know how I get on in case it will help you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

Had a letter from Mortimer Clarke today re our overdraft. They are threatening court action if we dont pay the outstanding balance by Thursday. We have been paying through a DMP, so please help and give me some advice on what to do.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can see they are acting to type, and blustering again. Just reply that since they have sent you no documentation that they can rely on to enforce your agreement, it is your intention to stop paying them until they can. even if it is an overdraft they have to provide a compliant agreement so that they can pursue you. Once again though I hope an expert from here can provide the template if there is one for this situation. I,m in court in November with Marlin, so will be able to let you have first hand accounts of what transpires.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats interesting, are we sure they do not have one under Mortimer Clarke or Phoenix?. If they are collecting without a CCL, then they are committing a criminal not just a civil offence - It would be nice to see them hit with this!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have checked the public records of the OFT on Marlin the do not have a CCL and they do require one if the debt is over £50.00 as defined in the said Act with regards to credit tokens

 

So what does that mean to the peeps that they are chasing in their usual threatening way

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can see they are acting to type, and blustering again. Just reply that since they have sent you no documentation that they can rely on to enforce your agreement, it is your intention to stop paying them until they can. even if it is an overdraft they have to provide a compliant agreement so that they can pursue you. Once again though I hope an expert from here can provide the template if there is one for this situation. I,m in court in November with Marlin, so will be able to let you have first hand accounts of what transpires.

 

 

I was wondering if I should S.A.R. them on this account or is it too late.

 

Good luck with your court case

Link to post
Share on other sites

(Thanks to Martin3030 for this)

 

This is current-and same address;

 

 

CCA Search :: CCA Search Results :: Licence Details

 

Application / Licence Details

 

 

 

 

Licence Number:0594095

Licence Status:Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration Number Marlin Europe I Limited5948653

 

Categories:

 

Consumer credit Consumer hire Credit brokerage Credit reference agency Debt adjusting/counselling Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:No

 

 

Issued Date: 15-Dec-2006

Expiry Date: 14-Dec-2011

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

 

Current Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition David PageOFFICER Martin DunphyOFFICER Tariq KhanOFFICER

 

Nature of Business:

 

Debt Collection

 

Current Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Principal Place Of BusinessMarlin House, 16-22, Grafton Road, WORTHING, West Sussex, BN11 1QP, United Kingdom Registered OfficeThe Courtyard, Shoreham Road, Steyning, West Sussex, BN44 3TN

 

Historic Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Principal Place Of Business2 The Courtyard, Shoreham Road, Steyning, West Sussex, BN44 3BJ Registered Office2 The Courtyard, Shoreham Road, Steyning, West Sussex, BN44 3BJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...