Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DCAs chasing previous tenant's debt - how do I stop this?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought my house over 6 years ago and I still keep getting fairly regular letters from DCAs addressed to the previous owner's son, demanding payment of various debts.

 

Every time I get one of these letters, I phone the relevant company and inform them that this person does not live at this address, has not done for over 6 years and that I do not know them and do not have any forwarding address for them.

 

But I still keep getting letters... I can only assume that, because they cannot find any other address for this person (who, according to his mother when I bought the house, was living and working in Spain and using her address as a postal address), they are leaving my address on their files at his last known address or something.

 

This has now reached a point where I have received a letter from Meritforce threatening to send an "authorised collector" to my address to collect this debt. I have phoned them this morning and given them the same information and been informed that they will "pass this information to their tracing department for investigation" but that this person "must still be registered at the address somewhere" and that they cannot and will not prevent the doorstep collector from calling at my address. When I was not happy about this, their excuse was that the collector won't be coming to my address looking for me, they'll be coming looking for XXXX XXXX. Oh cos that makes it all better then! :eek::x

 

I asked if they can tell me when this collector will be calling and they said if the tracing department finds that XXXX XXXX is not registered at the address, then the collector won't be calling. But they've already told me that he must be registered at my address somewhere for them to have sent letters to him there! :confused: I also made the point to them that, as I routinely call DCAs and inform them that XXXX XXXX does not live at my address, whatever company passed them this debt must already have been thus informed by me - yet they are obviously still pursuing this debt at my address!

 

I am getting fed up with this now and it doesn't seem right that these companies can continue to chase a debt at my address despite having been informed that that person does not live at this address. Their attitude seems to be that my word is not good enough and they would have to verify themselves that he doesn't live here - which I suppose is fair enough except they obviously are either not bothering to investigate and verify that, or are for some reason unable to verify that (this concept of him still being registered at this address "somewhere").

 

How can I stop this? Is there any way I can force these companies to remove my address from this person's record? Or is there some central system/database where I can officially disassociate this person's name from my address?

 

I shouldn't have to be continually phoning DCAs for debts that aren't mine and having to deal with doorstep collectors!!

 

Edit: I've just realised from reading through another thread that Meritforce are the doorstep collections agency of Mackenzie Hall - is this right? In which case, I am even more annoyed because I know for a fact that I have called Mackenzie Hall on at least 3 separate occasions (I know because I clearly recall on the last 2 occasions telling them that I had already contacted them about this!) to inform them that this person does not live at my address. How can I stop these people?

Edited by Alipeeps
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you've allowed yourself to become a bit too involved.

I would just return all mail unopened as 'Not known at this address - return to sender'. Hang up on any phone calls. Leave it at that.

 

Doorstep collectors have no more rights than I do. You can quite legitimately tell them to go away (use you own words). They can't enter your house (unless you invite them in of course, but that's not likely, is it?) or take property. These things can only happen after a court case and then only by bailiffs. In your circumstances that will never happen.

 

Unsurprisingly your attempts to disclaim any responsibility have only flagged to the DCAs that someone there is paying attention - and just might be the person they want trying to evade them!

 

You've wasted a lot of time and telephone calls on this. Give up now for your own peace of mind.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice. I guess I thought I was being helpful by informing these people that they are wasting their time and the person they are looking for does not live at the address. At first I did ignore the letters and/or return them unopened but I got so fed up of getting them I ended up opening some to see what they were and contacting companies to try and stop the letters.

 

Is there really no way I can force companies like these to remove my address from this person's record?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi

The action you need to take is really this, send all letters addressed to this person back to the originator, simply write on the unopened envolope NOT KNOWN AT THIS ADDRESS, RETURN TO SENDER, pop it in to the nearest post box.

 

A work colleague had a similar problem with mail adreessed to a prevoious tenant, this being opened by his OH (a right prying git), I advised he pop into to our legal department, they advised him that,

 

1. It is an offence to open another persons mail

2. To send all letters back to the originator

3. Most companies receiving calls from him, would believe that he was the individual they were trying to contact, as letters were intended for that person were opened by him.

 

He receives an occasional piece of junk mail address to this individual

 

Andy

Edited by old_andrew2007
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi

You could [EDIT] them off in this way, put the unopened letter into an envelope with the return address, accidentally forget to place a stamp on it, this is my favorite way to annoy DCA's at present.

Edited by freakyleaky
Removed inappropriate language.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry we've all been there.

 

 

... and now we're all cynics :D

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

You could [EDIT] them off in this way, put the unopened letter into an envelope with the return address, accidentally forget to place a stamp on it, this is my favorite way to annoy DCA's at present.

 

Now that idea I like... ;)

 

Time for some payback I think! :D:p

Edited by freakyleaky
Removed inappropriate language.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah well. Seems like it's my own fault for trying to be reasonable with these companies. :rolleyes:

 

I think you've learned a valuable lesson that everyone on here has learned; You CANNOT be reasonable with DCAs. They view everyone as a liar and a cheat without exception

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you've learned a valuable lesson that everyone on here has learned; You CANNOT be reasonable with DCAs. They view everyone as a liar and a cheat without exception

 

Yeah, I've had my own dealings with companies like this for debts of my own - I guess I was foolish in thinking that they would stop chasing for unrelated debts once informed that the person they want is not there to be chased. *sigh*

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

I get this wherever I live ... mostly due to people knowing they can avoid debt by not giving forwarding details ... but not always. You may get the occasional situation where someone has died, they have no relatives ... so no one instructs the companies. Happens.

 

A few years back I had them coming regularly. I got so fed up with one lot ... a mobile phone company, seemed someone had been using my address to set up an account ... or they'd screwed up with their records ... was always getting mail for someone else from a nearby village for example, purely cos the street address was the same ... so much for postcodes!

 

Anyway, I got so annoyed with these people ... they said I had *overseas call centre; no idea about basic regulations in the UK at all* to provide them with proof. Er, get lost! So, I ended up telling them I would expose what they were doing in the papers, radio and TV. Well, they stopped sending them.

 

The funny thing is, the person who had lived at that address ... I later discovered where they had gone to live ... guess where? Same village as above. I was sorely tempted to inform the companies concerned where they were living. I never did. Not my responsibility to trace on their behalf. And it was very easy how I found out ... they were in the paper several times.

 

So, as everyone else has pointed out here ... I learned in the end ... I felt I had to do it, though ... now I just bin or return to sender. Nothing to do with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What annoys me specifically about these idiots at Meritforce (although I know it's just the usual tactics by these firms and I shouldn't be surprised) is that, in making the point that I have previously notified any DCAs that the previous tenant no longer lives at the address, I specifically asked them if the account had been passed to them by another company and they agreed it had but claimed they didn't know/couldn't tell me what company it had come from. And then I read around on here and find that Meritforce are part of pigging Mackenzie Hall who I've definitely spoken to before (and who I've had my own issues with). God, these people are infuriating. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Er, yes, that's why you should NEVER EVER acknowledge someone elses debt.

 

I specifically asked them if the account had been passed to them by another company and they agreed it had but claimed they didn't know/couldn't tell me what company it had come from. And then I read around on here and find that Meritforce are part of pigging Mackenzie Hall who I've definitely spoken to before

 

I'm getting confused here? Are these debts belonging to previous tenants ...? So, why are you asking these DCAs these questions? I'm just curious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Er, yes, that's why you should NEVER EVER acknowledge someone elses debt.

 

Well perhaps foolishly I didn't think I was acknowledging the debt, I thought I was being helpful and informing them that the person they are trying to contact isn't at this address. Lesson learned. From now on everything addressed to that tenant goes in the bin or back in the post.

 

I'm getting confused here? Are these debts belonging to previous tenants ...? So, why are you asking these DCAs these questions? I'm just curious.

 

Yes, the debt I contacted them about today belongs to a previous tenant. I was just trying to make the point to these people that I knew for a fact I had already informed any DCAs chasing this person that he was not resident at the address - I was trying to point out to them my legitimate displeasure at the fact that this account had been passed to them to chase at my address despite the DCA knowing (due to having been informed by me) that the person they want is not living at the address.

 

Actually, finding and reading through this website has been an eye-opener and I'm rather glad this situation prompted me to find this place. I hadn't realised just how sneaky and conniving these companies are and I'm had my own problems with them on occasion and I will be much more aware of how to deal with these people in the future!

 

So in a way, I guess I could say this has ultimately been a good thing! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi- ive been reading through these forums about dca's and some of the advice is so silly, ignoring a debt is the worst thing you can do. i dont mean in your case as its not your debt.

 

i do agree with the others that you shouldnt have opened the mail and from now on send it back but by law if you ring a dca as a 3rd party and tell them its not your debt they have to RMDLR which is remove from dialler which removes your number permantly from the dialling system and also ICUGA which is an incoming call unconfirmed gone away. this then shoots the address to the trace department who will then get back to the client and inform them its a wrong address and they will find other goverment ways of tracking the person.

 

if you have advised the dcas that it is a wrong number + address therefore it is an unconfirmed gone away and they can NOT come round to your house nor can they save your details.

 

hope that helped :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone
hi- ive been reading through these forums about dca's and some of the advice is so silly, ignoring a debt is the worst thing you can do.

 

Oh, here we go again. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi- ive been reading through these forums about dca's and some of the advice is so silly, ignoring a debt is the worst thing you can do. i dont mean in your case as its not your debt.

 

 

The advice isn't about ignoring the debt it is about ignoring your unreasonable and unlawful demands to enforce payment without the authority of the original credit agreement.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

Alipeeps - DCA must not continue to chase people who they have been informed do not live there - by doing so they may (depending on what they saying to you etc) be breaking the DPA.

 

Have a read of this (my bible hehe)

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

Section 2.8

Link to post
Share on other sites

by law if you ring a dca as a 3rd party and tell them its not your debt they have to RMDLR which is remove from dialler which removes your number permantly from the dialling system and also ICUGA which is an incoming call unconfirmed gone away. this then shoots the address to the trace department who will then get back to the client and inform them its a wrong address and they will find other goverment ways of tracking the person.

 

if you have advised the dcas that it is a wrong number + address therefore it is an unconfirmed gone away and they can NOT come round to your house nor can they save your details.

 

hope that helped :)

 

Hello!

 

Alipeeps - DCA must not continue to chase people who they have been informed do not live there - by doing so they may (depending on what they saying to you etc) be breaking the Data Protection Act.

 

Have a read of this (my bible hehe)

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

Section 2.8

 

Thanks for the advice both of you - this is the kind of thing I was wondering about... that surely there must be some system/legislation that says they have to stop sending mail etc to my house or sending agents to my house when they have been informed that the debtor they are looking for does not live there.

 

Off to read that link notsoevil.... :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...