Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Have you Been given a train fine? (reclaim the right)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please start a thread of your own if you wish to report any developments.

 

If you do challaenge the tickets could you include copies of the letters you have recived in your thread.

 

Also could you include a link to your thread in this thread.

 

Cheers

 

JOSH_IOU

amend as necessary

 

 

 

Dear [name],

 

Please find enclosed a copy of the Penalty charge Letter Notice [insert reference number] which I received on [date]. It was issued by [name of company issuing ticket] on behalf of [train company] and is attempting to impose a 'Penalty Charge' of £XX (reduced to £XX if paid within XX days).

 

Upon checking Statute Law, I was surprised to find that [the train company], or its agents, appear to be attempting to extort money from me in an unlawful manner. Please find enclosed an extract of the Bill of Rights Act 1689, enacted and formally entered into Statute following the Declaration of Rights 1689. I draw your attention to the section that I have highlighted:

"That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void".

This states that a conviction is necessary before a fine or forfeit can be imposed. As you will be aware, the Bill of Rights is a "constitutional statue" and may not be repealed impliedly. As stated in the "hoburn v Sunderland City Council" Judgment in the Divisional Court (18th February 2002) by Lord Justice Laws and Mr Justice Crane (I will paraphrase, but have included a copy of the judgment's relevant sections 62 and 63):

62."We should recognise a hierarchy of Acts of Parliament: as it were 'ordinary' statutes and 'constitutional statutes.' The special status of constitutional statutes follows the special status of constitutional rights. Examples are the ... Bill of Rights 1689 ... 63. Ordinary statutes may be impliedly repealed. Constitutional statutes may not…"

I am not aware that any Statute Laws of england makes any express reference to repealing the Bill of Rights Act 1689.

 

Therefore, it would appear that [train company] and its agents have no lawful authority to demand money for an alleged infringement that has not been dealt with by a Court of Law. If you wish to proceed against me, please refer the matter to a Court of Law in an orderly fashion. Otherwise, the forfeit demanded of me is illegal and void.

 

Please also confirm to me in writing that you have advised the relevant officers of the Company and its agents that they are acting illegally by attempting to claim powers which are forbidden to them, and that all issuing of penalties is being done only after conviction by a Court of Law.

 

I should warn you if you do proceed to the court the court may take this notice as harrasment. Under the administration of jsutice act this notice is not enforcable in acourt of law.

 

 

Yours sincerely, etc

 

ENCLOSURES

1. Photocopy of Penalty Charge Notice

2. Extract of the Bill of Rights Act 1689

3. Extract of hoburn v Sunderland City Council Judgment, sections 62 and 63.

Edited by JOSH_IOU

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as Iknow this has only been used to claim back parking tickets under the council's unlawful parking scheme.

 

 

If you have been issued a demand and not a county court claim I do not see why this should not work for the trains as well.

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a demand via letter as well?

Edited by JOSH_IOU

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you got a demand or if you were issued a notice Then you can use these legislations.

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Won't work for Railway FPN, as it is covered by the Railway Byelaws, under the Penalty Fare Scheme, but yes it would work for parking.

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This wont work for railway PF as you are not being 'fined' you are being charged a 'standard fare'.

As we all know proper fines cannot be given out by people other then JP's or judges.

 

The railway Penalty Fares are issued in accordance with railway bye-laws the railways acts and regulations issued by the department of transport (under the railways acts).

It could well backfire as the appeals people would just prosecute you under the regulation of the railways act 1889.

 

However most inspectors make minor mistakes on the notices and if you state this in your appeal you will win by default as they cannot enforce a incorrect notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re mc661's post above, 100% accurate information regarding the PFN and Penalty Fare scheme... one other thing to check on this is that the rail operator (TOC) has actually registered its penalty fare scheme with the DoT, as only 3 have done so, any PF's issued can be argued as unlawful under the regulation of railways act.

 

Although, you may find the rail operator would proceed with court action, and let a judge decide it is was unlawful, is it worth taking those chances for a train ticket?

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re mc661's post above, 100% accurate information regarding the PFN and Penalty Fare scheme... one other thing to check on this is that the rail operator (TOC) has actually registered its penalty fare scheme with the DoT, as only 3 have done so, any PF's issued can be argued as unlawful under the regulation of railways act.

 

Although, you may find the rail operator would proceed with court action, and let a judge decide it is was unlawful, is it worth taking those chances for a train ticket?

 

Hmm under the rules the TOCs have to give D(a)fT 3 months notice of an intention to start a PF scheme.

I was always under the impression that most if not all TOCs have been given permission to issue PFs. The most recent of which is Great Western.

Bear it in mind that FCC/NXEA/Southern/Southeastern dont need to seek permission as they have already got it under the old Network South East permission and it just carries over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mc661, only 3 TOCs have registered the scheme, yes Network SE have continued, and it counted as 1 TOC for the purposes of the PF scheme.

 

The list is

 

Network SE

One C2C

Tyne & Wear Metro

 

Most other TOC's will issue an excess fare notice, and charge the £10.00 admin fee for processing this and effectively invoicing.

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mc661, only 3 TOCs have registered the scheme, yes Network SE have continued, and it counted as 1 TOC for the purposes of the PF scheme.

 

The list is

 

Network SE

One C2C

Tyne & Wear Metro

 

Most other TOC's will issue an excess fare notice, and charge the £10.00 admin fee for processing this and effectively invoicing.

 

Interesting.

Where is this list... just out of interest.

Because SWT, Chiltern, FGW and London Midland claim to charge PFs.

 

TfL can charge PFs under transport for london act 2008, which has allowed them to increase them to £50 (£25 if paid within xx days).

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get a current list from the DFT website, alot of the lists are outdated from the SRA era.

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get a current list from the DFT website, alot of the lists are outdated from the SRA era.

 

Yeah have had a look on the DfT site but cant actually see anything under the PF section. Ill prob dump a FoI request into them tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I know this message goes back a bit, but given other recent postings I thought it worth updating

 

Originally passed as an Act in its own right in 1984, legislation making it lawful for the then B.R. to charge a penalty is to be found in The Penalty Fares (Railways) Rules which you will find now incorporated in The Railways Act 1993 (as amended).

 

As others have said, that authority carried over to parts of the old NSE area and new schemes have been approved by the DfT for other rail operators since.

 

The legal right to charge a penalty exists for all those train operating companies that have been granted such authority.

 

Of course, that does not mean you cannot appeal the issue, but it needs to be done in accordance with the rules under which the penalty fares scheme is properly approved.

 

Any challenge under Bill of Rights legislation is doomed to failure where a railway penalty fare has been correctly issued

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...