Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, await the Directions Questionnaire from the court. No, the Directions Questionnaire is just a short form and leads to the case being transferred from MCOL/CCBC to your local court.  If you Google "Form N180" you can see a blank copy on government web pages.
    • There will only be one hearing (typo possibly 25th is a Saturday Courts closed ) clarify with the court.
    • Upload a redacted copy of their statement (+ Exhibits) please.
    • No Andy, I'll scan, redact and upload later today. So the court sent me 2 letters, same envelope and stapled together but with different dates!. 1. N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, stating: UPON considering the papers herein IT IS ORDERED THAT The claim is listed for an attended hearing 25 May....... at which court will consider allocation..  etc   2. N24 Notice of PTR/Adjnd/Restored/Hrg/Management conference TAKE NOTICE that the hearing will take place on 24 May at....... When you should attend 30 minutes has been allowed for the Hearing   No other instructions anywhere in the envelope or on the letters. Do I attend both?
    • Then leave it just proceed with the claim( strike out/SJ application are risky).....the defendant will not be permitted to rely on written evidence (documented) only verbally as they failed to comply with the N157 (unless they have filed with the court and failed to serve you a copy) ?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ahh, poor RBS!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5544 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry but am I missing something??? :confused:

 

I'm still waiting for the stay to be lifted from my £1500 claim against RBS (ongoing since March 2007), for charges they've levied, which I believe to be illegal. A lot of the charges are because the original charges have caused other charges.

 

RBS, because of their greed chasing the easy money by lending irresponsibly, are finding things a little difficult so what do they do ... ask their shareholders and the Government for help. I know they only made (pre tax) £9.9 bn in 2007

£10.8 bn in 2006

£9.7 bn in 2005

£8.1 bn in 2004

so I suppose you've got to have a little sympathy for them!!!

 

Oh yes and their CEO Sir Fred Goodwin only earned £4.1 million in 2007, (so he's obviously feeling the pinch a bit) that's just £79,000 a week ... hang on, I am desperate for the £1500 they owe me,thats 2% of his weekly earnings.

 

What's wrong with this country when an institution gets whatever they want but the man-in-the-street gets knocked at every turn.

 

If I make a mistake and lose money will the government be there to help me?...NO WAY!!!

If I make heavy losses from a gamble will RBS be there to help me?...NO WAY!!!

 

***Sorry but I needed to get it off my chest!!!

 

THANKS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Canobeans,

 

Had this very discussion with one of my clients today, and I have to say I whole heartedly agree with you. The major financial institutons have had it to good, for to long, and need to find out how to earn their money like the man on the street.

 

To many people are in to many other peoples pockets and it stinks of a cartel mentality.

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hello again everyone!!!I'm still waiting...probably the same as the rest of you...in the meantime though I was just looking through this again.A quick calculation shows that the profits made in 2005/2006/2007 by RBS come to £28bn and surprise surprise we the taxpayers have bailed them out for...what was it???...oh yeah £28bn...coincidence???Also shouldn't the RBS be changing their name to the PBB (Peoples Bank of Britain)One last thing I was wondering about...if more money is printed 1) who gets it?2) where from?3) can I apply for some of it?4) won't it devalue what is already in our pockets?5) will I get into trouble if I photocopy some tenners of my own? (kidding!!)Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that 'fictitious money' was what caused this crisis in the first place!!neil

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...