Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What you can/cannot claim


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here is a list of charges you can reclaim. Remember different companies will give them different names.

 

late payment charges

Returned Direct Debit charges

Admin Charges for closing a mortgage.

Deeds dispatch fee

Penalty interest

 

 

 

 

 

You can not claim:-

 

Interest normally due on the mortgage.

Arrangement fees.

Solicitors fees.

Fees for arranging your own insurance.

Higher lending Charge.

Early redemption Charge.

 

 

Edited December 2010

Thanks for the many replies-as you can see,there has been some interesting challenges,so the above list should not be taken as set-in-stone.

Edited by MARTIN3030
update

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Hi,

 

Question for Martin if you're available. You mention that Admin Charges for closing a mortgage are reclaimable. Because we redeemed a mortgage with Mortgages 2 Ltd early, we were forced to pay an "administration fee" of £14,000. I know this is an early redemption charge, but the bank itself does not call it this. Therefore isn't their admin fee reclaimable? I mean, I think I could argue this.

 

Frustrated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Letting you know that, having taken Mortgages 2 Limited to court for penalties, broker commission and ERC, totalling £18,000, we have settled. Accepted £4,000 just before allocation questionnaires were due. I know this is not a lot, but I want to focus on my other case, against G E Money.

 

This does show, however, that Mortgages 2 don't really want to go to court. Our case, by the way, was based on a Mortgage in 1999.

 

Frustrated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Hi,

 

Letting you know that, having taken Mortgages 2 Limited to court for penalties, broker commission and ERC, totalling £18,000, we have settled. Accepted £4,000 just before allocation questionnaires were due. I know this is not a lot, but I want to focus on my other case, against G E Money.

 

This does show, however, that Mortgages 2 don't really want to go to court. Our case, by the way, was based on a Mortgage in 1999.

 

Frustrated.

Sorry to post this here but I don't know how else to ask Frustrated, but I think Mortgage 2 LTd are connected to Mortgages PLC and I am interested in your case as that is who I plan to go after for arrears charges. I don't think they were my best option at the time I was put on to them, so would the broker have earny a fortune out of it? I suspect so, how did you find out the cost of the comission?

 

Any advice appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took out a fixed combination mortgage with Abbey National in 1999. Fixed for 6 years with a £2200 cashback.

This was at a fixed rate of 6% + an additional 1.45% to cover the cashback. Total rate was 7.45%.

In March 2003 , i had to redeem the mortage as Abbey wouldnt offer me a remortgage.

I had to pay back the cashback in full , £2200.

I also had to pay another penalty at the fixed rate of 7.45% for a penalty period of 300 on a balance of £35570.59 = £2178.08.

There is a section saying penalty period above the 300.

What I am claiming is why have i got to pay the 7.45% over the period of 300 [doesnt specify as to days or months] .

I would have thought it sghould be at 6% for 72 months.

 

Just wandering if anybody can help me out here please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can interest be reclaimed if it was added to arrangement fees and maintenance vouchers? Someone has been charged a whack of interest by buy as you view (see here (last few posts on thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/brighthouse/178450-buy-you-view-but.html) If it can be done, what letter can be suggested do she can start to re-claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi,

 

Anyone know if I can reclaim any of these:

 

1) ERC - whereby new mortgage was taken with same provider? ERC wavied on previous mortgage with same lender as well?

2) Legal fee

3) Debt Counselling fee

4) Debt Counselling services

5) Personal secured loan charge for acting in this matter

6) Completion fee

7) Application fee

8) Sundries

9) payment option fee

10) discharge fee

11) Portable product additional borrowing fee

12) administration fee

13) arrangement fee

14) returned direct debit fee

15) arrears charge

16) solictors instruction fee

17) duplicate interim statement fee

18) insurance fee

19) discharge of mortgage fee

 

Please can anyone help!!!!

 

many thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Anyone know if I can reclaim any of these:

 

1) ERC - whereby new mortgage was taken with same provider? ERC wavied on previous mortgage with same lender as well?

2) Legal fee

3) Debt Counselling fee

4) Debt Counselling services

5) Personal secured loan charge for acting in this matter

6) Completion fee

7) Application fee

8) Sundries

9) payment option fee

10) discharge fee

11) Portable product additional borrowing fee

12) administration fee

13) arrangement fee

14) returned direct debit fee

15) arrears charge

16) solictors instruction fee

17) duplicate interim statement fee

18) insurance fee

19) discharge of mortgage fee

 

Please can anyone help!!!!

 

many thanks,

IMO, the only items that you can reclaim a bieng unlawful are items 14 and 15 with the possibilty of 12, depending on what it is

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I'm surprised this thread has not developed further. Isn't this what CAG is all about?

 

That list by Emanevs is pretty exhaustive. Part of the problem is understanding the context in which a particular lender charges a certain fee. To generalise however, perhaps it should be re-organised into three categories of claim - YES, POSSIBLY and NO-WAY HOSE!

 

At a stab, I'd probably go with

 

YES:

 

12) administration fee

14) returned direct debit fee

15) arrears charge

 

POSSIBLY:

 

1) ERC

2) Legal fee

3) Debt Counselling fee

4) Debt Counselling services

5) Personal secured loan charge for acting in this matter

9) payment option fee

10) discharge fee

11) Portable product additional borrowing fee

17) duplicate interim statement fee

18) insurance fee

19) discharge of mortgage fee

 

NO-WAY HOSE!:

6) Completion fee

7) Application fee

13) arrangement fee

16) solictors instruction fee

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I'm going to start a new thread about the decision I just received from the FOS, but thought I would stop by to say they have decided that I am NOT entitled to returned DD fees, arrears fees - except where my account was in credit, or brought up to date - a refund of solicitors fees where they cost less than GMAC had charged me, or any interest incurred by them adding this lot onto my balance.

 

Not a happy puppy! If anyone has any advice as to whether I should accept, please pop onto my thread re this, I'm going to title it Disappointing Mortgage Reclaim Outcome, and give your opinion as to what to do next.

 

Good luck to everyone still going through this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

W

 

Many on these Forums have warned about the conduct of the FOS in these matters so it's not surprising to hear them siding with "you know who" - disappointing as that may be.

 

The point is, the rulings by the FSA specifically relate to Mortgage accounts in Arrears and how lenders handle those charges and apply interest. The ruling by the SC re Bank Charges however is very narrow and is focused on current accounts of commercial banks NOT the general charges of other lenders e.g. mortgage charges.

 

The jury is still out somewhat as to what people should/n't be claiming regarding mortgages but the law is there for you to use if you want to pursue this. Many (including me) have had success with reclaiming some mortgage charges and others seem to have failed.

 

At the end of the day, thankfully YOU are not bound to accept the FOS decision and legal recourse remains available IF you are not happy with the way they conducted the matter. It may be that a court will take a much different view on your mortgage account charges if you go that route. It may also be that the lender in question will pay up after just the threat of court action or on receipt of initial court claim documents!

 

However, be warned that should you choose to go to court at this stage and the lender opts to defend, they may well cite the FOS ruling against your earlier claim so be prepared to argue against that possibility.

 

Can you post a link to your new thread?

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Bustthematrix. At the moment, I'm really ticked off, so I'm thinking I'm going to take further action - just have to do even more research now! Bleh! Lol!

 

Just noticed after I'd posted that earlier, they have added interest to the tiny amount they offered, but still been charged God knows how much interest on all of those arrears charges that were added to my balance.

 

My new thread is at : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/255222-disappointing-mortgage-reclaim-outcome.html

 

Not too sure about links, to be honest, so I'm not sure if it'll work!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
I'm surprised this thread has not developed further. Isn't this what CAG is all about?

 

That list by Emanevs is pretty exhaustive. Part of the problem is understanding the context in which a particular lender charges a certain fee. To generalise however, perhaps it should be re-organised into three categories of claim - YES, POSSIBLY and NO-WAY HOSE!

 

At a stab, I'd probably go with

 

YES:

 

12) administration fee

14) returned direct debit fee

15) arrears charge

 

POSSIBLY:

 

1) ERC

2) Legal fee

3) Debt Counselling fee

4) Debt Counselling services

5) Personal secured loan charge for acting in this matter

9) payment option fee

10) discharge fee

11) Portable product additional borrowing fee

17) duplicate interim statement fee

18) insurance fee

19) discharge of mortgage fee

 

NO-WAY HOSE!:

6) Completion fee

7) Application fee

13) arrangement fee

16) solictors instruction fee

 

A number of caggers tried claiming ERC in the early days of CAG and they lost, leaving them with massive costs.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?62003-~~~**IMPORTANT**-Mortgage-Claimants-~-PLEASE-READ-~~&p=523486&viewfull=1#post523486

 

We have no reason to believe things have changed.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A number of caggers tried claiming ERC in the early days of CAG and they lost, leaving them with massive costs.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?62003-~~~**IMPORTANT**-Mortgage-Claimants-~-PLEASE-READ-~~&p=523486&viewfull=1#post523486

 

We have no reason to believe things have changed.

Alrightie, so, ERC off the list then...it's long enough without ERC charges on it any way...:p

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a list of charges you can reclaim. Remember different companies will give them different names.

 

You can not claim:-

 

Higher lending Charge.

Hi Martin, I'd appreciate if you could clarify why you believe this cannot be claimed. I know a few people who are working on it at the mo. Thanks.

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...