Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBOS - 1st letter received. Advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I sent my 1st letter off to my local bank last week explaining that I want my charges refunded and I have received the letter below back.

 

I was wondering if this is a standard letter (I know bits of it are but the bits I am unsure of I have highlited in bold. Can someone please have a look to see if this is a standard letter please as I am going to send in letter 2 tomorrow :)

 

 

dear xxxxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated xxxx and I appologise for any dissatisfaction caused by the application of charges to your account.

 

We believe that our charges are fair, reasonable and transparrent.

We consider the amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in acordance with your agreement with usand our published tariff, which we are satisfied complies with all applicable laws and regulations. We are also commited to ensuring the transparecy of the info that we give to our customers about the operation of our products

 

Against that background, we must differ to the views expressed in your letter.

Accordingly the charges that have been applied to your account must stand.

 

Thanks etc...

 

 

Can anyone shed some light for me as I think that this isnt a standard letter.

 

The letter was sent by my local branch and not Tommy McLean etc at head office.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks pretty standard to me - don't let them rattle you!!

 

Stick to your guns & your timetable - after the 14 days have passed since you sent in your 1st letter, send in the Letter Before Action.

 

You're doing fine, keep us updated!

** I AM NOT A LAWYER, PLEASE CONSULT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT **

 

I have successfully claimed against: "MBNA, Capital One, Bank of Scotland & Clydesdale Bank"

 

The Consumer Action Group is a Self-Help website, Moderators & Site Helpers offer advice on a voluntary basis. Please spend time reading the FAQ's, and other cases relating to your bank before starting your own claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply JMio :)

 

It appears that I have mistakenly used a different template for my 1st letter.

 

I sent them the following letter which was replied to above.

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

I refer to default charges which have been applied to my account over the last 6 years by The Royal Bank of Scotland, amounting to £767.98.

I have been a loyal customer of The Royal Bank of Scotland for 16 years.

 

I have always maintained my account well and believe that the charges applied to my account do not reflect the cost to the bank of my account going into unauthorised overdraft.

I therefore ask that you repay the amount of all these charges, £767.98.

I am happy for you to contact me on ******* to discuss the matter.

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

I will stick to the templates from here in future.

 

 

What letter should I send my local branch next?

 

 

this one

 

 

or

 

 

this one?

 

 

Sorry for the confusion and thanks for your help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were you I would go for the pre-lim one, simpy because you haven't actually stated in your own letter the "legal" reaon you are claiming back your money. You also haven't given them a deadline etc It will only make a difference of about 14 days or so, as that is how long you will give them to reply to the pre-lim letter. If you don't get a satisfactory response after sending that then send the Letter Before Action (LBA).

Good luck.

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well after I had used the wrong template I realised that I am not claiming enough!

 

I am just out the bank there and handed over 3 letters for various amounts totaling £1100.

 

I had an interesting chat with the lady at customer services and she informed me that she will be sending these to head office as there is a dept there who deal with these sort of claims so hundreds of people must be trying to get their money back from RBOS.

 

Fingers crossed it all works out as the RBOS are robbers without the mask!

 

I will keep you all updated with my progress :)

 

Thanks for all your help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...