Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old Endowment Policy - Can Anyone Help


Guest Mumofthreeboys
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2014 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Mumofthreeboys

Well I'm going to court with the Woolwich and so feeling there was more money unlawfully taken I should go after our old endowment for mis-selling.

 

We were sold the policy by Hambro Guardian Assurance in March 1991 for £64,000 for our first house together.

 

Basically, they sent someone round to discuss the endowment and made it sound so good you couldn't turn it down....... it would pay off the mortgage and then some and we would have enough for a holiday, etc, etc.

 

We took out the policy, but in August 1992 stopped paying into it, as we just couldn't afford it.

 

So, I paid a visit to the Which? website and fired off the letter of 'complaint concerning advice received on endowment mortgage' on 22nd May giving them 14 daysto reply.

 

Got a letter back dated 8th June from Countrywide Assured saying 'that there were time limits that apply to complaints regarding the sale of endowment policies. These rules state that customers have three years to complain from the date they ought reasonably to have become aware they had grounds for believing the policy was mis-sold.

 

I note in August 1992 you ceased to pay any further premium to the policy and the policy subsequently lapsed. Had you been unhappy with not receiving a value or about the sale of the policy I feel you would have contacted us at that time'.

 

They have said they will not investigate my complaint and this is their final decision.

 

So, does anyone have any useful ammunition with which to hit them please - all comments welcome :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mum!

 

I would suggest another letter, outlining the fact that the policy was frozen/stopped due to your financial reasons, and not due to the performance of the policy at the time.

 

Refer them to their legal obligations to deal with a complaint properly and not to come back with excuses. Also, ask whether any actual deadline has passed, or whether it is just their opinion that you should have complained earlier.

 

It's my opinion that they don't give money back willingly (who does).

 

There also may be other avenues to go down, but start with the possible mis-selling

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys

gordonhall, thanks for your help. I have added your comments into my draft reply letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

Hi

 

I had three endowments, two sold to me in April 1888 (sold by independent brokers who can't be traced now) and third in August 1989.

These were not needed and I had no dependants at the time.

 

They were sold in connection with mortgages.

All had major shortfall and the brokers never carried out any checks or risk Assessments.

 

I wrote to the companies but two of them said their brokers were independent and did not to abide by the law as the law came in effect in August 1988 and they have rejected the claims.

 

The last one in 1989 has also rejected as the small broker I think didn't give them any checks or risk Assessment as he never did any.

It was missold. And I did not at that time understand about endowment and was made to feel I should take it or I won't get the mortgage.

 

i wrote to the company but they have rejected as they want me to provide evidence what the broker said but I have not got the brokers notes!

All I have is my paperwork proof of payment and policy doc and letters of shortfall.

 

These policies are quite old and matured in 2012 and 2014.

Is there any hope

Or what's the way forward?

 

Would be grateful for any advice.

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

thread is +12yrs old

you wont get see here

 

start a new thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...