Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bus passenger/correct change rights.


johndtray
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Although i drive, i use the bus to get to work as its easier than driving and cheaper..

However on severa occasions lately, i have found that bus drivers refuse to let me/others on, if we try to pay for a ticket, when THEY dont have enough change to give us.. Is this legal?!

An all day ticket is 3.50 where i live- And i have had it in the past where i have tried to pay with a fiver, and all i have got back is 'sorry aint got no change, cant let you on, youll have to go change it, and catch the next one'.

All well and good- but the next one isnt coming for another 20 mins, and THAT would make me late for work!?!?!?!?

Does anyone know of my rights with this?Surely if i have enough money to pay for my ticket, its the bus companys problem if they havent got change, and thus shouldnt refuse me boarding as the problem is on their side?!

I have checked the companys rules on their website all it states is 'please try to have the correct change', it says nothing about being refused boarding....

Anyone any ideas??

Link to post
Share on other sites

The onus is on the buyer to tender legally the correct fare.

 

There is no legal entitlement to give change.

 

You can overpay or not get on.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forestchav is correct on this issue.

 

Incredible as it may sound, legally, one has no right to change if one, for example, bought a pack of chewing gum in a shop for 40p and gave a £20 note for it.

 

However, the reality is that this is an extreme example and very unlikely to happen.

 

Although situations do arise where it does such as catching a bus, vending machines that don't give change etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of bus companies would give a change ticket in this situation which can either be exchanged for cash from another driver or the offices or can be used next time you travel.

 

Until recently, the only bus company to serve where I live did not give change at all. Fortunately we now have two companies serving us and the new one does give change

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

NCT (Nottm City Transport) are exact fare and have been for years (except the 2 routes which leave the "city area").

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the companies in my area had an policy that certain people would be allowed to board even if they did not have money for the fare, such as young people alone in dangerous situations (certain areas or late at night I guess?) or people clearly in a state of distress. The driver would ask for contact details if possible and the company might send a polite letter later asking for payment.

 

It wasn't an advertised policy for obvious reasons but I have no reason to doubt the person who told me about it.

 

There are some additionals rules that might come in to play - some compnies are contracted to provide local government mandated services I believe, with possible additional policies attached - but I think there is nothing in a normal situation to force a driver to accept a fare.

What the law 'is' and what I think the law 'is' often differ. Always do your own research and take legal advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think a bus company can refuse to let a minor board... I can't cite it though.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think a bus company can refuse to let a minor board... I can't cite it though.

But they do :( My daughter buys a weekly pass which for some reason is only valid until 8pm each night. One night the bus that would of got into the bus station at 7.45pm in time for the 7.55pm bus home was missing ... she actually got to the bus station at 7.55 just as the bus home pulled out the next bus was 8.25pm ... the driver wouldnt allow her to use her pass and she didnt have enough money on her to pay.

 

I had to get my dad to go and pick her up as hubby was away and I dont drive

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have travelled on a train without the ability to puchase a ticket (after I got my wallet stolen at night) some years ago. The train staff let me on after giving my address and telephone number, with a requirement to pay the fare later (which I did).

 

With buses, I think the problem with minors is who the minor is. Where I live, most bus drivers won't let minors on no matter what, mainly due to said minors behaving in a manner more appropriate to cavemen on acid. I know not all youths are like that, but it is a shame. I would hate to think that someone vulnerable would be left stranded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a passenger had no money for his/her fare. They should ask for an unpaid fare voucher. This is just a slip of paper that the passenger writes his/her details on and the price of the fare. They can then travel on the bus and pay the fare at a later date.

Children should not be left at a bus stop, but allowed to travel, especially late at night.

Student passes were only valid to 8pm any time after that then they had to pay.

I used to get them coming out of the pub and trying to use the pass to get home at midnight.

The unpaid voucher is not widely used, as it takes so much time to fill out and puts the bus behind on its timetable, the drivers tend to keep it to themselves.

Tip us a wink on my scales if you think I may have helped at all;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...

It is impossible for a driver to carry change not only due to the additional weight in addition to all the gear he/she has to carry to the relief points where drivers change over.

 

Also there is nowhere to store lots of change in the tiny cabs, more especially the newer ones as the space has been reduced for additional passenger space for wheelchairs and prams etc.

 

Remember a bus driver cannot nip into the bank or send a junior member of staff out to get more change.

 

Many bus companies do not supply floats due to the sheer number of buses on the road for example FIRST have around 12500 drivers per day at work, times that by £50 worth of change and you have £625,000 of dead money floating around so any change the driver has is usually out of his own pocket or is because other passengers have not been too lazy to ensure they have the correct change for the bus so that the inconsiderate ones that are too idle to do this can peel off a £20 note for the £1.20 fare.

 

A change voucher is usually offered or other methods of payment (contactless) but of course there are always the ones that want to make a point and make a fuss usually by abusing the drivers in the most appalling way which is really the reason they are kicked off the buss, but there are no free rides so it is pay or get off. It is true there is no legal requirement to give change in any business.

 

As far as the vulnerable and children travelling they should never be refused travel due to a lack of funds, however, trying to con the driver, sneak on to the bus or use another's pass is a no no, which will end up with the refusal of travel due to fraud /anti social behaviour.

 

A child should approach the driver and advise that they have insufficient funds though this will not wash if they have just come out of the sweetshop having spent their fare or are trying it on repeatedly, just some of the reasons for refusal of travel that get omitted when reported in the press. But the right of travel for vulnerables exists for obvious reasons, as stated refusal is usually because the little angels are actually little devils.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

busdriver2018 welcome to CAG

 

Please be aware that this thread is from 2008, if you have anything you wish to ask please start your own thread.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...