Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
    • saying the thread is locked, what shall I do?
    • Please fill in the forum sticky and upload a copy of the invoice, redacted of anything that could identify you -  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I've been stitched up by my (former) company.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5961 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

It's been a long time since I've posted here but I think I've been screwed over. Here's the story:

 

I was working 6 months probationary period for this company and 5 months into it I wanted to talk to some people about some concerns I had so I could get some answers, resolve the issues and get on with things. I was given some vastly unsatisfactory answers to my questions and told there would be a follow-up meeting to find out my decision.

That meeting was yesterday.

 

I had decided that the job itself was good enough to overlook the issues and carry on with it as I really enjoyed the job itself. Upon telling them I was happy in the job and would like to carry on with it, they suddenly decided it was time for a disciplinary meeting and I was dragged over the coals for three very trivial matters - one of which was my sense of humour.

 

No mater what i said or how I stood up for myself, they refuse to listen to me and told me they didn't believe my sequence of events. They subsequently dismissed me.

 

The company has a policy on training, that if you leave within a certain period, you have to repay training costs. I was told that as a "gesture of goodwill", they would withhold my holiday pay and week-in-hand payment and offset it against these training costs.

 

I was tired from the arguments and the three hour drive to the office, so I gave up and signed the form just so I could get out of there. But on refleciton, my feeling is:

 

Training courses are charged at a high rate and I don't think it's fair that they committed me to them within my probationary period.

 

The courses I did are essential for the job I was doing (I did no optional qualifications) and without them, I couldn't have gotten a true view of whether I would like the job.

 

They've sacked me, so why should I be liable for the costs anyway? This was their choice so surely they should take responsibilty for the costs?

 

I'm sure they're not allowed to withhod money that I've earned/accrued.

 

Any advice would be a great help.

 

J

Settled in full £3,610.28!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure they're not allowed to withhod money that I've earned/accrued.

 

Quite correct. I suggest that you send a letter, along the following lines:

 

Dear HR Manager - Appeal Against Dismissal

 

I am writing to appeal against my dismissal that occurred on Fri 21st Dec. {insert reasons as to why their three charges against you are a load of rubbish}

 

I was also asked to sign under duress, a form purporting to waive my rights to holiday pay and notice pay.

 

Please note that this form was signed under duress, and that I understand that it is not in any event possible under the Working Time Regulations 1998 (as amended) for me to sign away my statutory rights to holiday pay and that my right to notice pay can only be signed away in limited circumstances.

 

In respect of your wish to deduct the cost of a training course from my final salary, please note that I have not at any time agreed to this deduction, and if you proceed with making it, this will represent an unlawful deduction from wages, which I shall pursue in the employment tribunal, along with a possible claim for wrongful dismissal and unpaid holiday leave.

 

If I do not hear from you within 28 days, I will commence proceedings for the above without further recourse to yourselves.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...