Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Premier Account


wills7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I currently have a current account that i pay for 15 pounds a month. i've never the used what it offers and i never signed up for it in the first place it just appeared about a year ago. i want to get rid of it as i don't want to pay for something i don't use but i have a large overdraft and i'm worried in case it affects the overdraft facility.. the bank is RBS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't mis sold as it was never sold to me! They just added it to the account without telling or asking me!!.. there is no way on this earth they will have a signed agreement from me for it as i know i never signed one

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they just converted your account to Royalties Premier or something like that?

 

I did sign up for the account in question so I know what I was signing for. But if they just suddenly converted a free current account to one that incurs a fee without your permission, then they must clearly be illegal - not mis-sold but just plain illegal. Put another way, it is like walking through a store and someone puts a product in your hand and takes money out of your wallet!

 

Any legal eagles here may have something else to say.

I wonder if MBNA are the new Enron :roll:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you haven't signed anything and they have been charging you then that would likely come under a different rule to reclaiming bank charges. It is a legitimate service charge, but not in your case it seems as you didn't sign a contract for the service.

I wonder if MBNA are the new Enron :roll:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go into the branch and kick up a big fuss, ask for all payments back plus interest and a guesture of goodwill as an appology.

 

you could either let them credit it to your account and reduce the OD or just tell them you want it for christmas shopping.

 

 

Or you could keep it running a few years and let it accrue a ltiile more interest before you claim:)

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having just spoke to the bank i was given this premier account because i increased my overdraft last year!!!!.. Don;t know how that works? I've told them unless everything that i've paid over the last 12 months in fees isn't reinbersed in to my account by the close of business tomorrow i will be taking it further.

This is the second time in 6 months something like this has happend. Earlier this year a member of staff at the same branch applied for a credit card for me without me asking and i didn;t even want one :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, well increasing your overdraft does not imply switching accounts - particularly one that carries a fee. I had to sign a form for that account which included a credit check, so how they can just switch you and start charging you is anybodies guess.

 

Let us know how you get on with them reimbursing you. I take it they smiled sweetly in the branch to keep you quiet! ;)

I wonder if MBNA are the new Enron :roll:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've still not recieved anything back since my compaint but have been told that the loan i took out had a preferential rate as to the basic account and as i hvae now got the basic account back then my loan rate will change and i will pay more than i am doing now!! Is this right can they do this?? i understand that the difference on the overdraft will change but thought i had signed for fixed personal loan and not one they can change??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know of a few accounts that give preferential rates on loans (and interest on savings for that matter) when you have a premium current account with the provider. They have every right to offer a better rate in that case. BUT I doubt very much that they have the right to switch your account to a premium one that you pay for without your consent.

 

Perhaps you did and didn't realise (small print that you need a magnifying glass for perhaps?). In that case, perhaps you could go after the fact they missold the loan to you.

 

I'd check the terms and conditions carefully. Perhaps ask for a copy of the signed agreement if you don't have a copy - check that carefully. If you are still certain you didn't sign for it, report them to the ombudsman. Be careful though as they may get nasty over your loan and cause you grief.

I wonder if MBNA are the new Enron :roll:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...