Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thats because this claim has not been allocated as yet hence the above hearing *Case Management " to determine the directions (N157 Notice of allocation) which will follow after this hearing. You are not requested to submit a statement but have all the details with you (claim form defence CPR CCA etc etc)   Andy
    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS credit card has charged me on a ZERO balance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5890 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently paid off my RBS credit card in full, but two days later RBS attempted to take a direct debit payment from my account. Since I closed by RBS account and switched to Smile, the direct debit was not in place (I never switched it as I intended to cancel the card).

 

I had not bothered logging into RBS online banking to check my statement as I considered my business done with RBS, aside from a letter needing to be sent to cancel the card. Since their was a postal strike a few weeks back, I hadn't received a statement for the card, but I just happened to log in and strangely enough, 2 days after taking the money to clear the card balance, they attempted to take a minimum payment that would have been correct had I not paid the balance in full. The payment was rejected as no agreement was in place and the payment was reversed. RBS then added a late payment fee, followed by interest and payment protection.

 

 

They have since added more charges for me not paying the previous balance they had arrived at all by themselves.

 

Surely this can't be right. Not only are they slapping illegal charges on me but are doing so based on a zero balance!!

 

Anyone have any ideas how to tackle this one? I am thinking that they either zero the balance, ensure my credit record does not show I have not missed payments, and then close the account. Otherwise the FSA can deal with them and that's before I go for the last 2 years worth of charges! Is that the right approach do you think?

I wonder if MBNA are the new Enron :roll:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently paid off my RBS credit card in full, but two days later RBS attempted to take a direct debit payment from my account. Since I closed by RBS account and switched to Smile, the direct debit was not in place (I never switched it as I intended to cancel the card).

 

I had not bothered logging into RBS online banking to check my statement as I considered my business done with RBS, aside from a letter needing to be sent to cancel the card. Since their was a postal strike a few weeks back, I hadn't received a statement for the card, but I just happened to log in and strangely enough, 2 days after taking the money to clear the card balance, they attempted to take a minimum payment that would have been correct had I not paid the balance in full. The payment was rejected as no agreement was in place and the payment was reversed. RBS then added a late payment fee, followed by interest and payment protection.

 

They have since added more charges for me not paying the previous balance they had arrived at all by themselves.

 

Surely this can't be right. Not only are they slapping illegal charges on me but are doing so based on a zero balance!!

 

Anyone have any ideas how to tackle this one? I am thinking that they either zero the balance, ensure my credit record does not show I have not missed payments, and then close the account. Otherwise the FSA can deal with them and that's before I go for the last 2 years worth of charges! Is that the right approach do you think?

I wonder if MBNA are the new Enron :roll:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

complain to rbos, then the fos

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, you will unfortunately have to go through their compaints procedure (ask for a copy of this and don't just ring, as sometimes companies atke it as an "informal" complaint". if your complaint is not resolved within 8 weeks, report them to the FOS, who will then charge them £400 for the privelege of investigating your complaint.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try talking to them first and explain their error to them- it would be useful to get rid of this issue amicably before you go after them for the other charges.

written entirely without prejudice to my whole rights and pleas in law and may not be founded upon in any proceedings.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What has happened is that the direct debit will have been initiated before your card payment has cleared the balance, as direct debits are set up in advance of the payment date so on the date the amount is debited.

 

It's just a simple cross over and if you talk to them they should remove the charges. When I worked for a credit card company it was a cause for no questions asked full refund. I'd imagine it would be the same with RBS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

More evidence of the joys of direct debit, I'm slowly swtiching any companies I don't trust over to satanidng order leaving me in control.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I received a letter of apology and the charges have been rufunded. Although my letter stated that I wanted them to close the account, they also asked if I actually want them to do that or they would be more than happy to send me a replacement card! I guess if they see a customer who has actually been quite a good one, they don't want to loose them. Maybe I'll keep it open and transfer my balance from the now even more awful Egg.

I wonder if MBNA are the new Enron :roll:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...