Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

West KO's RBS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been trying to claim from Royal Bank of Scotland for a while now. I have now made a claim through money claim. I orignally received a part refund from RBS for a little over £400. But they still owe me just over £1400. The problem i have at the moment is that i received a letter from the court saying that the summons should reach the bank on the 12/06/06 meaning that the bank have 28 days from then meaning that i should receive something by the 10/07/06? I have logged onto the money claim site today and there is a box that says claim and in that it says acknowledged 21/06/06. So is this where i start the 28 days. Need support please as i dont want to get it wrong and shoot myself in the foot. I still have not received anything from the bank. Is it advisable to call the bank and see what is happening and inform them that i am not willing to accept anything less than the full amount owed. HELP PLEASE

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

 

The 28 days start from when the claim is deemed to have been served to the bank, so from your post it sounds like this is the 12/06/06.

 

You should have had a letter from the court which said something like "posted by first class post on xx/xx/xx, deemed to have been served on xx/xx/xx.

 

Hope this helps,

24/04/06 - Capital One - £170.00 - Court Claim Acknowledged - Defendant intends to defend claim

18/05/06 - Full settlement received (£170.00) + another £20 for charges added after claim issued.

 

16/05/06 - RBS - Court Claim Submitted - Total £4900 (inc. Interest + Court Fee + Allocation Fee)

22/05/06 - Acknowledged by RBS

16/06/06 - RBS Defence Received

29/06/06 - Settlement offer from Cobbetts LPP £2,500

22/07/06 - Hearing date given as 27th October, York County Court

25/07/09 - Cheque received from Cobbets for £4800!! only £100 to go!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today i have received a "notice that acknowledement of service has bee filed" letter. It is from Cobbetts LLP?!?!?!?! What do i do? It says that they intend to defend all of this claim. Shall i call or just leave it for now, help muc appreciated.

 

 

Thank you

 

Neill

Link to post
Share on other sites

leave it for now only respond to any requests from the court. you're on exactly the same timescale as me. Rbs have 28 days from the date deemed received to file a defence with the court! when they do that you'll prob get an allocation questionaire but thats a few weeks off yet!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorrry for the long title.

 

Looking at my previous posts i am a little worried about the timescale of my claim. Biting my nails as we speak. Have not heard anything else from the bank or solicitors. It hasnt really been that long since last letter but feels like an eternity.

 

 

Any advise/support/small donations!(kidding!) welcome

 

Thank you

Neill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt you'll hear anything till day 28 when they enter a defence. You'll then receive a request for more information, most of which have been dealt with on previous threads so usually pretty standard.

 

Don't worry there are plenty of us in the same boat but reading around the forum gives you more confidence!!!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you staceymason, i hope your claim is going well, keep me updated. I still have not heard anything back from either bank or solicitors. Fingers crossed will be getting refund. The date for them to reply is coming soon.

 

Should i leave it a few days after the expected date of 10/07/06 or should i take action straight away??

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi west,

 

If they don't defend by day 28 you will be able to enter for a judgement by default on moneyclaim, you should do this as soon as it will let you only if they don't defend though.

 

Stacy x

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i looked at the pdf of my claim which states it was the seventh when i submitted the claim and the letter said 12th. Roll on 10th July for judgement.

 

Cannot wait.

 

It will pay last years student fees.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll prob be 00.01 on the 11th when you can apply for judgement, you'll have to wait up!!!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No post from solictors today. At 12.01 will be pushing for judgment from money claim, hope im doing this the correct way, wish me good luck everyone. Will keep you updated. Neill

Link to post
Share on other sites

is that the right date. The bank have acknowledged it on the 21/07/06 and said they will put in a defence. But is that a defence or just acknowledging that they will put in a cliam????????????? HELP!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi west,

 

Its 28 days from the date the bank were deemed to have received it, you should have had this in a letter from the court. I think in your case its the 12th! Which means today is the day! Check on moneyclaim has a defence been lodged?

 

Also ring the court at 4.15ish this aft and confirm a defence still hasnt been lodged! Good luck!!

  • Confused 1

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning everyone, i tried to claim at just after midnight this morning but the system wouldnt let me. I woke up bright and early this morning and the weather is amazing. I logged onto money claim and have applied for judgment on their ass (by default). Lets see how long it takes for them to cough up,any ideas anyone? I appreciate all the help everyone has given me, both here and at moneysavingexpert.com. I will let both sites know when they pay.

 

Fingers crossed.

 

And staceymason please let me know how yours is going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi west,

 

CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is so exciting!! I've got till next Tuesday for RBS to defend, I hope they don't bother!!! Let me know when you receive the cheque!

 

 

You might want to change the title of the thread now! give other people a bit of encouragement!!!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they can file a defence tomorrow, they had until the 10th, has it been passed to the judge to grant the judgement?

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means its with the judge, he should look at it today and grant it, RBS will then be sent a letter, if you look around there were two other people a bit further on after having judgement granted and I think RBS have applied for a set aside.

 

Hopefully they'll just pay up!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

its called double bailiff day vs RBS by cowlie and matilda153 is the other one, don't know how to put links in!!!!!!!!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again, i have just received a notice of transfer of proceedings. i s this standard??? and an allocation questionnaire.

 

Should i send it with spreadsheet?

 

help please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...