Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unfair deposit deductions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4760 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Where the landlord deducts money from the deposit, or fails to return it at all, the tenant's legal rights are as follows.

 

 

Tenancy Deposit Scheme

 

• Deposits paid after 6th April 2007 are protected by the Tenancy Deposit Scheme, a statutory arrangement imposed by the Housing Act 2004. Details of the scheme are set out at: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/landlords-tenants/117280-tenancy-deposit-scheme.html#post1184266

 

• The Landlord must enter into a scheme. The penalties for not doing so, or not providing details of the scheme to the tenant, are severe: the landlord will be ordered to pay three times the amount of the deposit to the tenant.

 

Note: Deposits paid before that date are only protected by the Tenancy Deposit Scheme if the tenancy is formally renewed on or after that date, by the signing of a new tenancy agreement, not if the tenancy merely continues by default.

 

 

Deductions from the Deposit

 

Whether or not the deposit is protected by the Tenancy Deposit Scheme, the money nevertheless belongs to the tenant and is subject to the following rules if a dispute arises concerning it.

 

Golden Rule: If there is no initial inventory, the landlord has no grounds for withholding the deposit (unless there are rent arrears). This is because the landlord, without an inventory, is unable to prove what the state of the property was at the start of the tenancy. Therefore it is not in your best interest, as tenant, to insist on an initial inventory.

 

• On leaving at the end of the tenancy, take plenty of photographs of the premises (with that day's newspaper in the picture), showing their condition, in case the landlord later claims that you left the place in a dirty or damaged condition.

 

• The landlord is the person who owes you the deposit, not the letting agent; so if you have to go to court to recover the deposit it is the landlord you must sue.

 

• The first step is always to write to the landlord (not to the letting agent), using the letter below. This is called a "Letter Before Action" (LBA) and must be sent before a court claim can be started.

 

 

How to find out the Landlord's Address

 

To sue for the return of your deposit, you sue the landlord.

 

Do not try to sue the letting agent. The landlord is liable for all acts of the agent, as the landlord is the principal, and it is the landlord with whom you have the contract.

 

Also, you will want to enforce any court judgement against the landlord. His biggest asset may well be the property you were renting. The letting agent might have no traceable assets, whereas the landlord is a sitting duck.

 

See: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/landlords-tenants/116744-got-judgment-how-get.html

 

 

The Landlord's Address :

 

• The landlord's address is normally stated in the tenancy agreement.

 

• As you were renting a property from the landlord, you can write to him at the property you were renting, as that is certainly his address.

 

• H M Land Registry will, for a fee of £3, send you a copy of the Register Entries for the property you rented, which give an address for the landlord. See Land Register Online

 

• By law, the letting agent must tell you the landlord's real address, provided you request that information while you are still the tenant. The agent must give you the address within 21 days of your requesting it. But it is too late to make that request once the tenancy has ended.

 

• Withhold the rent. By section 48 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, the landlord must give you an address in England and Wales at which you can sue him. No rent is due until he gives you that address.

 

• Talk to the neighbours. They will usually have a good idea of who really owns the premises.

 

For further information, see this link: Landlord's Address and Contact Details - LandlordZONE

 

 

The following is a Letter Before Action (LBA), which you must amend according to your situation :

 

Dear Sir,

 

I am writing to you concerning my tenancy of the premises at [address].

 

I request that you return my deposit of £_______, as the premises were left clean and in good repair when the tenancy ended. Allowing for fair wear and tear, the premises were left in the same condition as they were in at the beginning of the tenancy.

 

As the deposit was paid after 6 April 2007, you the landlord are required by law to keep the money in a separate account, and to provide the tenant with a written statement detailing (a) exactly what the deposit covers and (b) when the money will be returned. Please provide evidence that you have complied with this statutory duty.

 

The deposit must not be regarded as extra rent, to be used to improve the condition of the property.

 

Any amount deducted from it must be equivalent to the amount needed to replace “like with like”. For example, if the carpet was worn at the start of the tenancy, you cannot retain the amount that would pay for a brand new carpet.

 

You cannot deduct the replacement value of any item, even if it was brand new at the start of the tenancy, as this would be "betterment". You can only deduct from the deposit a percentage of the item's value, based on (a) its on condition at the start of the tenancy (which you must prove using the inventory from the start of the tenancy), and (b) the expected life of the item.

 

Nor can you make deductions from the deposit for general “wear and tear”. The tenant is only liable for damage that creates extra cost; the deposit is not there to provide a redecoration fund. You must redecorate at your own expense.

 

You must in any event prepare a dilapidation schedule, and you must have the relevant tradesmen give a written quotation (not an estimate) for each item of cost that you include in it.

 

I request that you give me receipts or invoices for work carried out, or quotations for work yet to be done.

 

The onus is on you to prove that there are circumstances justifying the retention of any part of the deposit, and to date you have not provided any such evidence.

 

I will therefore be in a position to demonstrate that it is unreasonable for you to keep any part of the deposit, should you be unable to produce the requested evidence and matters proceed to court.

 

You must remember that the deposit is my money. You must account for it properly. It is a common misconception that the deposit belongs to the landlord, but that is not the case and withholding it without proper grounds is unlawful.

 

I require your reply to arrive no later than 14 days after the date of this letter, together with your cheque for any amount not in dispute. If I receive no satisfactory reply by then, I will begin a County Court action for recovery of my deposit without further warning.

 

The Court can order you to pay back the deposit, and the proceedings are very straightforward. Also, the Courts are very sympathetic to tenants whose landlords do not fulfil their statutory obligations.

 

I look forward to hearing from you within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

[signed]

 

 

Note: This letter is only an example, you must modify it to meet the actual circumstances of your case. For instance, if you accept that you are responsible for some damage or cleaning that needs to be done, say so in the letter. Acting reasonably may earn you credit from the court.

 

 

To sue the landlord in the County Court for the return of the deposit -

 

The following statement is an example of what to put on the Claim Form as the "Particulars of Claim", but you must modify it to reflect the actual facts in your case:

 

" I claim the sum of £______ plus interest, being the amount of the deposit which I paid on (date) under a tenancy agreement of premises at (address of premises).

 

If there was a written tenancy agreement, add this :

The tenancy was an assured shorthold tenancy. It was created in writing by a tenancy agreement dated (date) made between (name and address of landlord), the landlord, and (names and addresses of tenants), the tenant. The tenancy was for a fixed term of ___ months, commencing on (date), at a rent of £____ per calendar month.

 

If there was a verbal tenancy, add this :

The tenancy was an assured shorthold tenancy. It was created verbally by an agreement made on (date) made between (name and address of landlord), the landlord, and (names and addresses of tenants), the tenant. The tenancy was for a fixed term of ___ months, commencing on (date), at a rent of £____ per calendar month, payable monthly.

 

In all cases, add this :

The tenancy was terminated on (date), by (state method of termination: e.g. 'the expiry of the fixed term', 'notice given by the landlord', 'notice given by the tenant', or 'agreement of both parties'). The tenant left the property on (date). "

 

 

Notes:

• Your immediate landlord MUST be a defendant to the claim, even if there is a reason for also suing someone else.

• The landlord will have to prove the amount of any deductions from the deposit, to a standard satisfactory to the Court. The onus will be on the landlord to prove the original inventory and any alleged damage (known as "dilapidations").

 

 

For further information about suing the landlord, see this link: How to Start Proceedings - The Claim Form

 

Download link (to download this form, right-click on the link, and select "Save Target As..."): Form title "Claim form" (County Court form number N1):

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n1_0102.pdf

 

 

 

Advice & opinions on this forum are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I just read this great tip which can help with protecting your deposit: take lots of photos of the place at the very first day. Print or develop the asap. Post these out to yourself. When the package arrives, do not open the envelope. Open only if needed, in front of witnesses.

The postmark will bear the evidence of the time the pictures were taken.

 

Funky little tip, from Sunday papers, not bad, eh?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

not to burst the bubbe, what about envelope steaming? what alsp proves that the envelope was totally sealed when sent, i.e. it wasnt folded in when sent and licked on the day needed? and what proves the contents of the envelope you send?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure of the finer details of the envelope method - but its been used for years and I understand its been held up in court on a number of occasions.

 

As for digital cameras - this is a tricky one, as timestamping can ultimately be forged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can tell you now that there is no point in counting on digital cameras.

 

Remember the old flatt battery syndrome?

 

01-01-2000 00:00

 

I could take a load of pics aroudn the world, flog em on ebay n say they're authentic minute old Millenium photo's of famous places lol

 

Believe me, being a qualified programmer? A digitised item wouldn't stand a chance with me if it was plugged into a computer and had a date to change on it >

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
My deposit was paid in Feb 07 so before Tenancy Deposit Scheme.

 

Dont really know where this leaves me - perhaps the next step is to put something in writing?

 

I am sure she is taking liberties - am i right?

 

Start a new thread and detail the problem a little more. Will see if I can advise then.

 

Strike that, you already have. sorry. lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has been left unlocked so we can post helpful hint, genius ideas, template letters and share experiences with regards to deuctions from deposit/withheld deposit.

 

If you have a query or if you want to seek advice in your own case, please go back to a main forum and click New Thread button on the top of the forum. Before posting, please check if you can find a answer in the "sticky" section of the forum and read http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/residential-commercial-lettings/118080-questions-new-posters.html#post1197730

  • Haha 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
I can tell you now that there is no point in counting on digital cameras.

 

Remember the old flatt battery syndrome?

 

01-01-2000 00:00

 

I could take a load of pics aroudn the world, flog em on ebay n say they're authentic minute old Millenium photo's of famous places lol

 

Believe me, being a qualified programmer? A digitised item wouldn't stand a chance with me if it was plugged into a computer and had a date to change on it >

 

What about the EXIF data?

Edited by dave

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The best way to ensure the authenticity of the date on the envelope is to right the address on the back of the envelope and fix the stamp in such a position that it covers the edge of the flap. I have done this to ensure that no one else has opened a letter. The postage frank helps to proove that it has not been opened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not to burst the bubbe, what about envelope steaming? what alsp proves that the envelope was totally sealed when sent, i.e. it wasnt folded in when sent and licked on the day needed? and what proves the contents of the envelope you send?

 

By sending in a Secure RoyalMail SD bag, once sealed unable to open without damaging it. :)

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea if Ed is still active here anymore, but the "Golden Rule" above is now generally taken to be wrong.....although an inventory is very important, it is not the "be all and end all" - there are other ways to prove the base condition. Could either Ed or a mod edit the post, as it is now very misleading....

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Questions for you all, i have had my deposit returned to me, but not my rent as i was asked to move out before my conract ended does rent act in the same way as deposit?

I wouldnt have thought so, thats probably why they just refunded the deposit as they knew you would have to fight harder for the rent

Can you give more details?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

poolking - you have already created a thread on this, please dont post in the sticky as well...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

badger, you are a star... lol I didnt think if that! excellent idea! I mentioned this to my partner and she said "why not iron the stamp on the envelope with the steam on full". I tried this and it creates and excellent seal.

 

I also enquired at the postoffice and they can confirm AND sign that the envelope is sealed properly :) The tellers will stamp and sign the envelope witha 'SECURE CONFIRMED' stamp.

 

nice 1, thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I know four students who have lost 800 pounds of their money, before being accepted as tenants because the landlord raised the bar of acceptance. The estate agents in London said it was a holding fee and as they didn't meet all requirements i.e perfect guarantor credit scores etc... they could do nothing about it. I am absolutely disgusted with this coming from a reputable estate agent who would see students done like this. They kept them waiting for two months and only told them the bad news at the last minute. Now the students have less money and no time to look again....Thanks estate agents..:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys

 

My partner and I are currently going through a dispute with our previous letting agent, same story as a few on here; they are making unreasonable deductions from our deposit. We began the tenancy 2 years ago so it was before the new Deposit Protection scheme.

 

They want to take £450 in the name of the landlady for Gardening Decorating and cleaning carpets.

 

As we were unaware of our rights we offered £130 for carpet cleaning but felt the other quotes were excessive and unreasonable.

 

We have asked for previous inspection reports and the signed Inventory.

 

They paddle round the issue and refuse to mention the Inventory but keep telling us they are waiting for the Landladies reply to our offer. It is now 5 weeks since we vacated the property.

 

What would our next action be..? and would I be correct in saying if they didn’t produce the Inventory signed by us we should withdraw our offer and request our full deposit is returned. And what is an acceptable time frame for a resolve?

 

Thanks for any help in this matter its very much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I have been reading the messages with regard to unfair deposit deductions and wondered if you could offer me some advice please.

 

My daughters tenancy ended and in our opinion was left in a much better condition when she moved out than when she moved in. An inventory was taken at check showing the condition of the property. An inventory was not taken at the check out and the only matter raised was that the grass needed cutting. Following the check out with the letting agents the landlady went into the property at a later date and added to the inventory. She had not been present at the check in. the inventory from the check in shows that the property was not in a good condition when my daughter moved in. For example the whole house needed repainting. Carpets needed replacing some of which were. As the landlady would not pay for underlay we paid for this to be added. My daughter repainted most of the rooms with paint provided by the landlady. She now wants the walls to be repainted as two walls were not magnolia. However my daughter could only pick from colours that were provided by the landlady, as she said only pastel colours could be used. The skirting boards were also painted as at check in they were chipped and marked. We feel that the property is in a much better condition now then at check in. But the check out does not show this as nothing was recorded. Please can you advise appropriate course of action as we are considering going to small claims court for return of the deposit.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

My partner and I are currently going through a dispute with our previous letting agent, same story as a few on here; they are making unreasonable deductions from our deposit. We began the tenancy 2 years ago so it was before the new Deposit Protection scheme.

 

They want to take £450 in the name of the landlady for Gardening Decorating and cleaning carpets.

 

As we were unaware of our rights we offered £130 for carpet cleaning but felt the other quotes were excessive and unreasonable.

 

We have asked for previous inspection reports and the signed Inventory.

 

They paddle round the issue and refuse to mention the Inventory but keep telling us they are waiting for the Landladies reply to our offer. It is now 5 weeks since we vacated the property.

 

What would our next action be..? and would I be correct in saying if they didn’t produce the Inventory signed by us we should withdraw our offer and request our full deposit is returned. And what is an acceptable time frame for a resolve?

 

Thanks for any help in this matter its very much appreciated

Stevie hi and welcome

I assume you havent had to sign a new tenancy agreement in the last 2 years?

 

You need to write asking for your full deposit back, give them 14 days, if there was no check out inventory then they cant prove what it was like

Also you are entitled to see breakdowns and quotes for the alleged work that was done

 

Same for you tasco, get writing and keep everything in writing dont phone them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...