Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shorthold Tenancy - posession, eviction and notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This thread covers the following topics:

• it defines what a Shorthold Tenancy is;

• it explains the two (quite different) ways of the landlord obtaining possession: under section 21 and section 8 of the Housing Act 1988;

• it explains what criminal offences the landlord might commit in the process;

• it discusses how the tenant might end the tenancy during the fixed term;

• it explains the position when the fixed term ends;

• it warns of the risks of a tenant becoming intentionally homeless; and

• it tells you how to find specialist housing advice.

 

 

DEFINITION OF SHORTHOLD

 

A tenancy of residential premises that is granted after February 1997 is an Assured Shorthold Tenancy (or AST), unless the document creating it expressly states that it's creating an Assured Tenancy (as opposed to an Assured Shorthold Tenancy).

 

Accordingly, all tenancies that are created verbally are Shorthold. So are all tenancies that are created in writing, if the document doesn't say what type of tenancy it is creating (i.e. 99% of all cases).

 

There are two ways of obtaining a court order to end a Shorthold tenancy: either section 21 or section 8 of the Housing Act 1988. Both are explained below.

 

But if the tenancy is an Assured Tenancy, as opposed to a Shorthold, the section 8 procedure is the only means of obtaining a court order to end the tenancy.

 

 

SECTION 21 POSSESSION

 

Where the tenancy is an Assured Shorthold Tenancy (informally just called a Shorthold tenancy) the landlord can evict the tenant under section 21 of the Housing Act 1988.

 

The landlord must comply with each of the following requirements, and the tenant has a valid defence to the claim if the landlord does not do so.

 

 

Firstly, the landlord must give the tenant written notice under section 21 of the Act, ending the tenancy. If the rent is paid weekly or monthly, which is the usual arrangement, the tenant must be given not less than two months notice to leave.

 

However, if the rent is payable quarterly the tenant must be given not less than three months notice. If it is payable six monthly or annually the tenant must be given not less than 6 months notice.

 

The notice cannot take effect during the first 6 months of the tenancy. If the tenancy has an initial fixed term exceeding 6 months, the notice cannot take effect during that fixed term. Therefore the tenant always has at least 6 months in the property.

 

It is, however, perfectly possible for the landlord to give the notice during the first six months, or during the initial fixed term, provided the notice does not take effect until that period has ended.

 

For example, in a typical tenancy (i.e. one where the rent is payable monthly) a landlord will often give the 2 months notice at the end of the 4th month of the tenancy, to take effect at the end of the 6th month.

 

It can legally be given at the beginning of the tenancy, in which case the tenant is actually given 6 months notice, rather than 2 months.

 

But it cannot be back-dated, nor given before the date on which the tenancy starts. This is so that the landlord cannot cheat the tenant by ending the tenancy during the first six months.

 

The notice is known as a section 21 notice. It must be in writing, but does not have to be in any particular form.

 

 

Secondly, if the tenant does not move out when the notice expires the landlord must obtain a Court order for possession (i.e. an eviction order).

 

Therefore the tenant does not have to leave just because the notice has expired. The tenant is entitled to remain in the property while the landlord applies for and obtains a court order. That process usually takes another month.

 

 

Thirdly, if the tenant does not leave when the Court order is served the landlord has no right to remove the tenant. The tenant can only lawfully be removed by the Court bailiff. The landlord must therefore go back to the Court and apply for the bailiff to visit. That process usually takes a further 2 weeks.

 

 

However, the tenant should take into account the fact that on each application to the Court the landlord will incur legal fees (including solicitor's charges and Court fees), and the Court will normally order the tenant to pay part or all of those legal fees.

 

 

The advantage to the landlord of using the section 21 procedure is that it's faster than the section 8 procedure outlined below, because no hearing takes place. The matter is decided based on the written documents submitted to the Court, so the eviction happens quickly.

 

The disadvantage to the landlord of the section 21 procedure is that no claim can be made for anything except the eviction order. So he cannot make a claim for rent arrears, and must sue in a separate action for any arrears not covered by the rent deposit.

 

 

More detail, and some practical considerations, are set out at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/landlords-tenants/116263-landlords-claim-possession-example.html#post1163654

 

 

SECTION 8 POSSESSION

 

By section 8 of the Housing Act 1988, the landlord cannot evict the tenant within the first six months of the tenancy, or during the fixed term (if it's longer than six months), except on one of the following grounds: the "section 8 grounds".

 

 

The landlord can only use these grounds if:-

 

(a) The tenancy agreement contains a provision that allows early termination on the ground in question;

 

AND

 

(b) The landlord gave the tenant notice, before the tenancy began, that the ground in question might be relied on. (Note: This only applies to some of the grounds - see below.)

 

One consequence of this is that possession cannot be obtained under Section 8 if the tenancy was created verbally.

 

 

To obtain possession the landlord must -

 

1. Give the tenant 2 weeks notice ending the tenancy. The notice (called a "notice seeking possession" or "section 8 notice") must be given in writing. The notice can be more than 2 weeks in some cases (depending which ground for possession is relied on - see below); and can be shortened by the court in some cases (again, depending which ground for possession is relied on - see below).

 

AND

 

2. The landlord must obtain a Court order (called "a possession order"). To do this he must apply to the Court, satisfy it that the ground in question applies, and (for some of the grounds - see below) satisfy it that it's reasonable for the Court to make the order.

 

AND

 

3. If the tenant does not leave once a Court order is granted, the landlord must apply to the Court bailiff to evict the tenant.

 

 

The grounds which can be relied on (the "section 8 grounds") are:

 

Ground 2: That there is a mortgage on the property, created before the tenancy began, and the lender wants to sell the property (e.g. because of mortgage arrears), and that the landlord notified the tenant in writing before the tenancy began that he might seek possession on this ground (though the court can waive this requirement).

 

Ground 8: That the rent is more than two months (or eight weeks, if payable weekly) in arrears, both when the landlord gave the section 8 notice and at the date of the court hearing.

 

Ground 10: That some rent was in arrears, both when the landlord gave the section 8 notice and when the court proceedings were begun.

 

Ground 11: That the tenant has persistently delayed paying rent.

 

Ground 12: That the tenant has broken one or more provisions of the tenancy agreement, other than payment of the rent.

 

Ground 13: That the condition of the property has got worse because of damage or neglect by the tenant or any person living with the tenant.

 

Ground 14: That the tenant, or someone living in or visiting the property, has caused a nuisance or annoyance, or been convicted of using the property, or allowing it to be used, for immoral or illegal purposes (e.g. prostitution).

 

Ground 15: That the tenant, or someone living with the tenant, has damaged the landlord's furniture.

 

Ground 17 (Only available if the tenancy was created after 28 February 1997): That the tenant induced the landlord to grant the tenancy by making a false statement.

 

 

The notice period:

 

At least 2 months notice must be given for Ground 2. At least 2 weeks notice must be given for Grounds 8, 10 to 13, 15 and 17. In the case of Ground 14, Court proceedings can start as soon as the section 8 notice has been served.

 

Where the landlord relies on any Ground other than Ground 14, he cannot begin the Court proceedings during the relevent notice period.

 

 

The advantage to the landlord of the section 8 procedure is that it can be used to terminate the tenancy during the first six months, or during the initial fixed term if there is one (the periods when the section 21 procedure can't be used).

 

 

More detail, and some practical considerations, are set out at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/landlords-tenants/116263-landlords-claim-possession-example.html#post1163654

 

 

CRIMINAL OFFENCES THE LANDLORD MIGHT COMMIT

 

The landlord has to obtain a Court order to evict the tenant, who cannot legally be evicted (i.e. without his consent) in any other way.

 

However, the tenancy can be surrendered, by agreement of both the landlord and the tenant, at any time, even during the fixed term.

 

To evict a tenant, the landlord must go through the correct procedure: applying to Court, proving the ground, obtaining a court order, and then using the court bailiff to evict the tenant. If the landlord evicts the tenant in any other way, the landlord commits a criminal offence - see below. Also, if the landlord tries to frighten a tenant into leaving, the landlord commits a criminal offence - see below.

 

 

The criminal offence of harassment is committed if the landlord:-

 

• Behaves in a way intended to interfere with the peace or comfort of the residential occupier, or members of his family; or

 

• Persistently withholds or withdraws services which the residential occupier reasonably requires to occupy the premises as his home; and

 

• Knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, that his conduct is likely to make the residential occupier leave the premises, or not use part of them, or not use services the tenant is entitled to use, or not try to exercise the right to use those premises or services.

 

The tenant can sue in the County Court for financial compensation for any acts of harassment. If the landlord is convicted of harassment at an earlier criminal hearing, there will be little difficulty in obtaining this compensation.

 

The landlord may also have broken other parts of the tenancy contract.

 

 

A landlord commits a criminal offence of illegal eviction if:-

 

• The landlord evicts, or tries to evict, a residential occupier without following the required legal procedure; or

 

• Behaves in a way intended to interfere with the peace or comfort of a residential occupier or members of his household and, as a result, the occupier gives up the tenancy; or

 

• Persistently withholds or withdraws services which a residential occupier reasonably requires to occupy the premises and, as a result, the occupier gives up the tenancy.

 

Illegal eviction is a criminal offence under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (as amended by the Housing Act 1988 ), punishable by up to two years imprisonment and an unlimited fine.

 

 

A residential occupier who has been illegally evicted may:-

 

• Apply for a court order reinstating the tenancy; or

 

• Sue for damages (i.e. financial compensation). This can include any injury or damage to property, as well as the statutory damages for the illegal eviction.

 

 

ENDING THE TENANCY DURING THE FIXED TERM

 

The tenant cannot end the tenancy during the fixed term, unless:

 

1. The tenancy agreement contains a "break clause", i.e. a provision expressly authorising the tenant to give notice ending the tenancy during that fixed term (typically the fixed term will be six months); or

 

2. By a surrender of the tenancy, with the landlord's agreement.

 

A fixed term tenancy can't be terminated early by the tenant unless the agreement allows this or the landlord agrees. If the tenancy does not allow this and the landlord does not agree to an early termination, the tenant will remain bound by the agreement and liable for the rent for the whole period.

 

If the tenant wrongfully leaves early, the landlord can sue for the rent due for the remainder of the fixed period. In that case the landlord does NOT have to mitigate his loss by re-letting the premises.

 

 

LEGAL POSITION WHEN THE FIXED TERM ENDS

 

If the tenant wishes to move out on the day the fixed term ends, the tenant is not required to give notice to the landlord. This is because the contract between the landlord and tenant ends when the fixed term ends. The tenant no longer has any contractual obligations (either to give notice, or to pay rent).

 

This is so even if the tenancy agreement contains a provision (called a "break clause" - see above) specifying that the tenant must give notice if he wants to leave. Such a clause only applies where the tenant leaves early, before the end of the fixed term.

 

If the tenant stays beyond the fixed term, a periodic tenancy begins. This happens automatically, by operation of law, without either the landlord or the tenant having to do anything.

 

The period of the tenancy is determined by the frequency that the rent is payable: if rent is payable monthly, a monthly tenancy arises; if it is payable quarterly, a three-monthly tenancy arises; etc.

 

To end a periodic tenancy, the tenant must give the landlord one period's notice, in writing, expiring on the last day of a period (i.e. expiring on the day before the rent is due). Thus if the tenancy is a monthly tenancy the tenant must give not less than one calendar month's notice. It is best to give the notice a few days early, because it will be invalid if less notice is given than is required.

 

 

BECOMING INTENTIONALLY HOMELESS

 

Local Authorities have a duty to rehouse certain classes of people, such as those with dependent children. If the tenant intends to apply to the local Council for rehousing, it is essential that the tenant does not move out of the property until the Council has confirmed in writing that it will rehouse him/her.

 

If the tenant moves out without such a letter, he risks being deemed to have made himself intentionally homeless, and the Council can refuse rehousing.

 

For further information, see the following thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/landlords-tenants/94427-revised-homelessness-code-guidance.html#post869601

 

 

SPECIALIST HOUSING ADVICE

 

If you think you need specialist housing advice, visit your local housing advice centre: see

Shelter: Advice services directory

 

 

 

Advice & opinions on this forum are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk unpinned this topic
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...