Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver.  (Although earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.  I don't clearly understand it, but legal advice was something to do with the role the receiver has acting as an agent for the borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against the receiver ???).  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate app for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

offer letter, advice needed


SpikeyMike
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6046 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a letter from RBS after sending a preliminary letter making me an offer for bank charges, due to what has been happening recently I am unsure how to proceed, the offer is for 624.00 although the claim was for about 1100.00. Another thing is, my account has now gone over my agreed overdraft limit of 650.00 due to bank charges and yesterday I received a letter from a debt recovery agency threatening me with action if I don't repay the overdraft. any advice greatly appreciated. Here is the letter I received, the reason it refers to a previous letter is that I didn't receive the first letter RBS say was sent.

 

 

 

We refer to your complaint about bank charges. We wrote to you recently making you a goodwill offer in full and final settlement of your complaint about these charges.

 

We believe the charges are fair, transparent and lawful.

 

Since we last wrote to you, the bank (and several other banks) became involved in legal proceedings with the office of fair trading (*OFT*) about bank charges which we believe will resolve the legal issues on the fairness and legality of your bank charges.

 

We have asked the Financial Services Authority (*FSA*) to suspend the normal timetable for dealing with bank charges complaints and the FSA has agreed to this request subject to conditions that protect your rights.

 

However the goodwill offer the bank made to you still stands and you can accept or reject this offer. If you decide to take up this offer you must contact us within 2 months from the date of this letter. You should be aware that if you accept this offer, this will be in *full and final* settlement of your complaint. This means that it is unlikely you would be awarded a further sum even if the test case indicated that you could be entitled to a potentially larger amount. Though this does not preclude you asking for repayment of any further charges if the court finds they are unlawful.

 

If we do not hear from you within the specified 2 months, we will assume that you have decided to reject this offer and await the outcome of the legal proceedings with the OFT. This means that the bank's offer will expire(i.e. can no longer be accepted by you) and we will reconsider your complaint once the test case is resolved. We can assure you(in that instance) we have registered and stored your complaint.

 

Please retain your bank records, as this will make it easier for your to support your complaint on resolution of the test case.

 

Once the legal proceedings between the OFT and the banks finish, we will resolve your complaint as quickly as possible and apply the (test case) principles. This may produce a larger or smaller figure when compared with the current offer.

 

We are sorry that we have not been able to respond in full to your complaint now, but we (together with the FSA and the OFT) think that it is necessary to resolve the key legal issues before we decide how we should respond to your complaint.

 

Obviously exactly what will happen next will depend on the courts. We do not know how long the case will take - we have promised to proceed as quickly as possible but inevitably given the importance of the issues being considered this may take many months to finally resolve. But we can assure you that once the legal proceedings are completed we will resolve your complaint as quicly as possible. If at that stage you do not agree with our conclusions you will of course be able to refer your case to the Financial Ombudsman Service (*FOS*) (or to the courts)

 

Given this court case we have asked both the FOS and the courts not to proceed with any other case they are hearing until the test case is resolved. FOS has indicated that as a general proposition it will indeed not proceed with cases which rely on the legal issues being considered in the test case.

 

Similarly, you should be aware that if you choose to issue a claim in the County Courts, "the master of the Rolls" (in England and Wales) or "The Lord Chief Justice" (in Northern Ireland) has, at our request, issued a notification to the County Courts suggesting they stay proceedings about bank charges until resolution of the banks' proceedings with the OFT. Alternatively the bank will immediately apply to the Court for an order to stay your action until resolution of the bank's proceedings with the OFT.

 

We will keep you updated appropriately about the proceedings with the OFT. You can also check the latest position on our website at Overdraft charges update- RBS - The Royal Bank of Scotland

 

The FSA requires us to ensure that any bank charge complaint will not be adversely affected by the delay in dealing with it. For customers for whom Scotland is the most likely jurisdiction: In particular, your right to refer your complaint to the FOS will not be affected. The FOS provided a convenient alternative to the courts, and is free for customers. However, if you nonetheless wish to continue your claim through the courts in Scotland, you may wish to seek advice on filing a claim now to protect your rights in prescription although you may have to pay a fee.

 

If you have any further questions or would like an update on the latest position regarding proceedings please check our website Overdraft charges update- RBS - The Royal Bank of Scotland or call us on 0845 3030 442.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not enough - especially if they are hitting you with even more charges as we speak. Well I don't think so. It is difficult to know what to do though when you are having problems to start with and to refuse their 'kind offer' :p of just over half your claim is a hard decision to make. I guess you can fend off the DCA by saying you are waiting for your charges to be refunded.

 

Did you add overdraft interest into the amount you claimed or is it purely charges?

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is pretty much the standard letter that all banks are issuing to claimants since the OFT announcement was made.

 

Unfortunately, it now puts you in the difficult position of having to decide whether to accept their offer or whether to decline it and send them the LBA - and then file at court. If you send the LBA, they'll more than likely send you another copy of the above letter. And if you file N1 at court your claim will more than likely be stayed pending the outcome of the OFT announcement.

 

You could try accepting this as a partial acceptance only - pursuing them for the remainder via LBA/N1 at court. However, the banks tend to view partial acceptance letters as an outright rejection. It may be worth a try though.

 

It's a horrible decision to have to make right now, but I feel this is a decision that only you can make. So read as many threads as possible regarding the test case and how it's affecting claimants at the moment before reaching your final decision on their offer. Also, it's worth going over your schedule of charges again to ensure that it's accurate (e.g., no double entries or royalties fees, etc.) I'm sure you haven't made any mistakes at all............ but it's worth checking just to be completely sure.

 

Also, they can't pass your account onto a DCA whilst your account is in dispute.......... and as you're reclaiming charges from them your account is definitely in dispute.

 

Best of luck spikeymike :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is pretty much the standard letter that all banks are issuing to claimants since the OFT announcement was made.

 

Unfortunately, it now puts you in the difficult position of having to decide whether to accept their offer or whether to decline it and send them the LBA - and then file at court. If you send the LBA, they'll more than likely send you another copy of the above letter. And if you file N1 at court your claim will more than likely be stayed pending the outcome of the OFT announcement.

 

You could try accepting this as a partial acceptance only - pursuing them for the remainder via LBA/N1 at court. However, the banks tend to view partial acceptance letters as an outright rejection. It may be worth a try though.

 

It's a horrible decision to have to make right now, but I feel this is a decision that only you can make. So read as many threads as possible regarding the test case and how it's affecting claimants at the moment before reaching your final decision on their offer. Also, it's worth going over your schedule of charges again to ensure that it's accurate (e.g., no double entries or royalties fees, etc.) I'm sure you haven't made any mistakes at all............ but it's worth checking just to be completely sure.

 

Also, they can't pass your account onto a DCA whilst your account is in dispute.......... and as you're reclaiming charges from them your account is definitely in dispute.

 

Best of luck spikeymike :)

 

Hi, thanks for your reply, if thats right that they cannot pass on my account to a DCA whilst it is in dispute do you think I should contact them and point this out? I have phoned them a few times when I received letters regarding the overdraft limit and told them that I was awaiting a response regarding these charges and that I wasn't prepared to pay any more money into the account whilst it was just being taken out in charges and until the dispute was settled and now they have hit me with a letter from a DCA.....

 

Spikey

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely contact them with regards to your account being in dispute. In fact, adapt this letter to suit your own circumstances and post it to them recorded delivery (c.c. the DCA into it also). At least this way they can't ignore the fact that the account is in dispute.

 

Keep us informed of your progress x :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely contact them with regards to your account being in dispute. In fact, adapt this letter to suit your own circumstances and post it to them recorded delivery (c.c. the DCA into it also). At least this way they can't ignore the fact that the account is in dispute.

 

Keep us informed of your progress x :)

 

Hi, Hedgey, I phoned RBS today regarding the letter from the solicitior and spoke to a woman there who was trying to get me to agree to pay a reduced amount to what I owe the bank so that they could close my account, I explained to her that they shouldn't have passed the case to a solicitor whilst my account is in dispute but she just ignored me and kept going on about me accepting to pay 500 quid as a final settlement on the account. I asked her what would happen if I were to pay the actual amount that I owe and she said that my account would still be closed, so basically they just want to close the account asap. I told her I had been made an offer by RBS for the bank charges and that I am going to respond in the next few days, I think I am just going to accept their offer of 624.00 and let them close the account.......

 

Spikey

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...