Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
    • Thank you. You left all your personal details showing on the invoice, but I've removed them. From Googling it seems the free parking is limited to one hour.  You stayed two.  There is no point appealing, you did overstay.  That's apart from the fact the private parking companies are just interested in £££££ and never accept appeals. We have other Iceland cases, Iceland as a company refuse to have these invoices cancelled. So it's up to you. Pay £51 and the matter goes away. Or refuse to pay.  Horizon very rarely do court.  We would support you all the way. 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Case in Cardiff on Nov 14th stayed. Help needed to lift it!!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6048 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I need help please. My case has been stayed on Nov 14th and I want to apply to have the stay lifted on the grounds of hardship.

 

I have had no communication off anyone other than the court who sent me a notice of stay dated 15th August.

 

I am filling in the N244 form and need to know if I have to send anything else with it? I have filled in section C and have also made a personal statement of my circumstances to enclose with it. I am not sure if I should enclose the statement or not.

 

I will ring the court tomorrow to see if I have to pay the £35 fee (some others have not had to so I am crossing my fingers on that).

 

I still cant decide whether to fill in asking to see the judge or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just rang the Cardiff court who have told me that at this stage, all I have to do is to send a letter to the judge appealing for the stay to be lifted, and my reason why. I have been told that sending an N244 form in is more formal, and at this stage not really necessary. I was also told that a fee will be payable when I do send the form in.

 

Can anyone help by giving me an idea of what they have written in a similar letter? Probably best thing for me to do now, is to write a letter stating my reasons for having the stay lifted, and see how that goes now that I have been given that advice. Hope I am doing the right thing, and hope someone will help me !!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just rang the Cardiff court who have told me that at this stage, all I have to do is to send a letter to the judge appealing for the stay to be lifted, and my reason why. I have been told that sending an N244 form in is more formal, and at this stage not really necessary. I was also told that a fee will be payable when I do send the form in.

 

Can anyone help by giving me an idea of what they have written in a similar letter? Probably best thing for me to do now, is to write a letter stating my reasons for having the stay lifted, and see how that goes now that I have been given that advice. Hope I am doing the right thing, and hope someone will help me !!!!!!!!!

 

Lacey

 

It seems that lifting stays is very difficult because the courts are determined to support the banks now every inch of the way. There is a formal CAG guide to this, but I posted the info below on a thread recently in answer to a similar question. I hope this helps.

 

I've been studying this intently for weeks, and basically the shotgun approach of appealing all stays does not work. Common sense arguments about injustice and human rights have been brushed away with this conspiracy of the test case - of which the courts are a part now.

 

The only chance IMO is to focus a succinct application around your personal case and circumstances.

 

1 Are there special circs about your case? Close to judgement, bank failed to send papers, used delaying tactics etc. Stuff that argues why your case should really be over now anyway. Dish the dirt on the bank.

 

2 Your hardship. This is the subject of much debate, because like most stuff around the test case nothing is clear, so the courts stay everything (even credit cards), the banks win and we lose. You need to stress particularly if you receive benefits and whether the bank has been taking these. What debts do you have - especially priority ones like arrears of mortgage, utilities, income tax, council tax etc.

 

3 Threat of further problems. If you don't get your money back will there be mega grief, possibly leading to bailiffs, repossession, court claim against you, defaults etc. These are very strong grounds if you can show them.

 

4 Also stress the hardship of having forked out for claims and now finding that this money will not be returned for at least a year. This is small point, but very symbolic of the injustice, particularly where you paid it before the test case was announced and paid it in good faith believing that the court would deliver the service it was paid for.

 

I hope these points help. I would appreciate any feedback from members on these observations, or suggestions for amendment.

 

Varangian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Posted the letter to ask the judge to lift the stay today. I laid it on thick about the debt and circumstances and how terrible the bank has been. Just hope it works. I will let you know.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering if anyone knows how long it will be before I get a reply to my letter, is there some kind of timescale?

 

Im feeling a bit nervous about it now, I really hope the judge will lift the stay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i applied the judge came back to me within 7 days and although I had ticked no hearing -he agreed to see me. I did not have to go as bank settled. If you go to FSA website there is the agreement where it says in black and white - hardship cases should be filtered through- suggest you print that off to take with you - and send a copy to your bank.

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, I have just received a response back to my letter.

Its on a form headed GENERAL FORM OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER and it reads

 

Before DISTRICT JUDGE HENDICOTT siting at Cardiff County Court Civil Justice Centre.

 

UPON READING the Claimants submissions objecting to the proposed order of stay IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1 The sjbmissions be treated as an application to remove the stay in the order of 15-Aug-2007

 

2 The application be refused.

 

3 As this application has been refunsed without a hearing, either party may apply fot the application to be reconsidered at an oralo hearing. Any such application shall be on notice, and is reserved to HHJ Hickinbottom or DJ Hendicott unless expressly released by either.

 

What can I do now, is it worth my while asking for an oral hearing (send in the official form), or will I be wasting my time? Or does this mean that I would be welcomed to appear and put my points over orally? I can not add any more information to my application than what I have already given in the letter I sent in. I really need this cash. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, looks like all us Cardiff claimants are going to receive exactly the same as you... drop in in the Cardiff thread in the Barclays forum...we can all put our heads together and discuss the pros and cons of appealing (again).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can anyone help me?????

 

As I have already said, dated 11th Sept I received a response letter of the court to the letter I sent asking to have any stay lifted. In that I was told that the application for the stay to be removed has been refused.

 

Dated 15th Aug, I had a letter off the court stating that the claim be stayed with immediate effect, pending the ultimate determination of the commercial court litigation, and then said what to do if I wanted to apply to have the stay lifted.

 

After sending my letter asking appealing to the judge to continue with my case, and after having it refused, I came to the conclusion that it was a waste of time continuing.

 

However, on 21st September I received a letter of DG Solicitors saying that they were going to apply to the court for an order to stay the action until resolution of the banks proceedings with the OFT.

 

How can the court tell me my case has been stayed, when its not until weeks later that I get a letter of the solicitors telling me that they are going to apply for a stay? I really dont understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...