Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No Andy, I'll scan, redact and upload later today. So the court sent me 2 letters, same envelope and stapled together but with different dates!. 1. N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, stating: UPON considering the papers herein IT IS ORDERED THAT The claim is listed for an attended hearing 25 May....... at which court will consider allocation..  etc   2. N24 Notice of PTR/Adjnd/Restored/Hrg/Management conference TAKE NOTICE that the hearing will take place on 24 May at....... When you should attend 30 minutes has been allowed for the Hearing   No other instructions anywhere in the envelope or on the letters. Do I attend both?
    • Then leave it just proceed with the claim( strike out/SJ application are risky).....the defendant will not be permitted to rely on written evidence (documented) only verbally as they failed to comply with the N157 (unless they have filed with the court and failed to serve you a copy) ?  
    • Ive asked court to strike out for non compliance but they came back and said needs £275 application fee and formal n244  
    • Did the N24 invite either party to submit a statement ?
    • Thanks for responding Andy, that was my understanding when receiving the N24, mild panic when I got Link's WS for the date though! not sure why they would send me theirs..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I am new to this and need help with bank charges and benefits


vicky66
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have recently read that the banks cannot take charges from benefits. Does anyone know which benefits tese are, what I do if I have had charges taken from benefits and if anyone has successfully claimed using this argument?

 

please help

vicky66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vicky and welcome to the forum. There is lots of help on this subject available but just for starters, while I have a look for some more info for you, have a look at this post by Jailbird on another thread this morning.

 

Found this on MSE........may be helpful

 

Q: What else can I do if I am living on benefits?

A: If you rely on benefits for your main income, such as Income Support or Job Seekers Allowance, there is still possibly a way you can claim; though it relies on a slightly different law. All past claims have been based on contract laws but there is another law called the Social Security Administration Act 1992, which says that banks must not take charges from benefits as this money is needed for a person to live on.

If you are in this situation, contact your bank to tell them that you are living on benefits and it should process your compliant. If it still does not help, contact the Financial Ombudsman, but make sure you tell it that you are receiving benefits and your case will be dealt with.

 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info so far, I dont know how to go about tackling the bank to reclaim charges which they have taken from my benefit (working families tax credit/ child tax credit) as I dont want to get it wrong! I think it that the claim is not covered by the waiver but I am not sure

thanks

vicky66

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are right about a claim involving benefits not being affected so just start you claim as normal. I will post a link for you now. You will probably be exempt from court filing fees and will have to claim using the n1 form direct with the court.

Have a read of the newcomers thread ( i will post it for you in a second) and it will guide you step by step. Just come back and ask any questions you have along the way!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already put in a claim before the waiver using the usual letter templates. Now the waiver is in place is the fact that i have already put in a claim going to affect my claim for them taking monies from my benefit I am worried that I have messed this up! Also can I add in chrges that I havs incurred since I sent my original letter? Sorry if i am being a pain.

vicky66

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a claim which is on hold because of the waiver, however the charges that I have claimed have been taken from the account my benefits are paid into. therefore I was just trying to find out if I could continue with the original claim because of the fact that I am on benefits, without waiting for the oft case to go through the courts. sorry if it sounds confusing, thats probably because I am confused too.

vicky66

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I have not. After much stalling by HSBC I was just getting to the stage of starting court proceedings when the waiver and court case was announced. I have since spoken to my bank who said that my file was now on hold until the case has been heard. I have not heard formally from the bank in writing that this is the case although they said I would be sent a letter to confirm this. I then read that about the fact that they couldnt take money from benefits and so therefore was trying to find out if I could continue to claim the money by a differant means. But I want to be clear that I can do this as the banks dont need much of an excuse to say that the way I have gone about things are wrong!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think to be fair that I have probably done this all wrong from the start! I should have come on here first and read up on what to do instead of listening to friends who advised me because I didnt in my original claim include all charges that I should so therefore having added them up again they now are more than I originally claimed! So I think that I have completely messed this up and I dont really know what to do anymore. I just need some guidance and confirmation of the benefits issue. You probably think I am a real pain but need your help and you seem to know what you are talking about.

vicky:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have got my statements, sent my claim letter using friends advice. THEN joined the forums and have found out that I have not claimed all that I could (didnt include total charges) have realised that I have asked HSBC for less than I could have. They have my letter with total I have claimed and I dont know if I can or should send an ammended one with a higher amount on it. I am also on income assessed benefits and have also found out on here that it is unlawful for them to take money from benefit. So I now have a differant tack to approach them with but dont know if I can as I have already sent them a letter claiming the money. I think I may have messed up BIGTIME and would like anyones help with where I should go from here.

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok can you list in order your actions so far please.

If you have filed the claim at court already you can amend the claim, this will cost £35 which you can not reclaim. You would need to use the N244 which is in the template library.

We can advise further when you list your actions.

 

Ps. I have merged your threads please stick to this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I contacted Hsbc asking them for statements. I then sent them a letter reclaiming charges. They then wrote to me asking for a detailed breakdown of charges claimed. I did this and rang them after the waiver announcement and was told my claim is logged with them but will not be dealt with until after the big court case. I have since read these forums and have realised that I have not claimed all that I should have ( I didnt include total charges) and dont know if I can now amend the amount with HSBC. I have also read that if you are on income assessed benefits that the banks cannot take charges from them. The sole money going into the account since July 05 hasbeen from benefits. I dont know if I can now change tack and claim the same money back using a differant reason. hope this explains where I am at now.

thanks for replying

vicky

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...