Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yorkshire Visa now Marlin Chasing - **Ack'd AS SB'd - CLOSED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3264 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

Well after turning the house upside down( I do have nice clean cupboards tho)I cannot find the letters to Marlin, so I have no idea what I sent to Marlin and exactly how I worded them. I do know I said the account was in dispute.

I am so mad with myself because I printed copies off until then.

 

Do I not go the statute barred route now ??

 

I know they are going to start because I keep getting phone calls, which I do not answer.

 

Thanks Guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi all

Well after turning the house upside down( I do have nice clean cupboards tho)I cannot find the letters to Marlin, so I have no idea what I sent to Marlin and exactly how I worded them. I do know I said the account was in dispute.

I am so mad with myself because I printed copies off until then.

 

Do I not go the statute barred route now ??

 

 

That is a great pity.

 

 

There is no harm in sending a statute barred letter along the lines of:

 

 

To The Compliance Manager

Marlin FG

 

 

Date

Ref: Use theirs:

 

 

Sir /Madam,

 

 

I refer to the alleged deb for £xxxx.xx as referenced above, please note I do Not acknowledge any liability to Marlin.

 

 

Having reviewed my credit history I have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred, there for I will not make any payment or offer of payment now or in the future.

 

 

Marlin will now confirm that this matter is closed.

 

 

Used signed for post check delivery date:

 

I know they are going to start because I keep getting phone calls, which I do not answe

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brigadier.

 

If it goes to court because they don't agree, what happens if they produce the letters that I sent and theres something on them I shouldn't have said. Don't want a CCJ after all this time. I was fighting on the "application form and the t&c's" and the way YB tried altering the application form( by cutting off the heading "application form" so it looked like a credit agreement).

 

My husband agrees with you because we want it out of the way now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brigadier.

 

If it goes to court because they don't agree, what happens if they produce the letters that I sent and theres something on them I shouldn't have said. Don't want a CCJ after all this time. I was fighting on the "application form and the t&c's" and the way YB tried altering the application form( by cutting off the heading "application form" so it looked like a credit agreement).

 

My husband agrees with you because we want it out of the way now.

Hi alamand, it is a case of prodding the sleeping dog, if they have anything to dispute the SB claim let's get it out in the open, it can then be challenged. Mysterious payments of £1 or £10 that just happen to be the fees for CCA requests or SARs are the most likely things to crop up.

 

 

The app form trick is quite common but I have not seen one modified in this way for a long time.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have checked the balance and it is still the same so that should be fine,

I will wait for their next letter then, as I didn't respond to their last one.

1 more question, I send what you have put and not the SB one??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have checked the balance and it is still the same so that should be fine,

I will wait for their next letter then, as I didn't respond to their last one.

1 more question, I send what you have put and not the SB one??

It is your choice as to which you send I am no lover of template letters for this particular subject.

 

 

I go by results.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brig,

 

Well letter received asking for income/expenditure and phone message left from Marlin.

 

I have written your version and it will be in the post tomorrow. Signed for of course.

 

I have checked experian and noddle and no default or anything from Marlin or YB, in fact YB did not put anything at all on all 3 credit reference agency's even at the beginning, which I find strange.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO it will be SB'd

 

the FOS decision makes no odds.

 

they are just trying it on.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brig,

 

Well letter received asking for income/expenditure and phone message left from Marlin.

 

I have written your version and it will be in the post tomorrow. Signed for of course.

 

I have checked experian and noddle and no default or anything from Marlin or YB, in fact YB did not put anything at all on all 3 credit reference agency's even at the beginning, which I find strange.

 

 

 

Good morning Alamand.

 

 

I agree with dx, Marlin have been chasing a raft of SB and unenforceable debts some have been seen on here but I think it's the tip of the iceberg.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi every one

I received a reply stating that the acc is indeed statute barred n the matter is now closed.

Thanks everyone for your help.

 

Sorry I'm late with reply but when I have been logging on the site on my comp, this thread is not showing up. I have logged in through my phone, 1st time ever, and it's now here. Very very strange.

 

Once again thanks to everyone.

Alamand

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...