Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
    • If everyone who wanted or needed a permit could get one easily how would PCM make any money?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First Group buses


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2482 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone actually had any success following a complaint about Worst Group? Or even GMPTE?

 

I have had to complain about a couple of incidents. Past complaints usually result in a letter promising that it won't happen again, or that the driver will be spoken to (when anyone else with common sense would give the driver a P45).

 

I know I am probably being a bit overly optimistic that Worst Group might actually take a complaint seriously, but my blood is boiling - really!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gyzmo,

 

Unfortunately, PCV drivers are in short supply and the last thing that a bus operator wants to do is sack a "qualified" driver. The only time that this would happen is if the driver costs the company money i.e. lots of accidents/claims relating to that driver. First Group are effectively "self-insured" therefore accidents/claims cost them money. I doubt that they would be unduly worried if a driver was just unhelpful or rude.

It's the world we live in I'm afraid.

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know. what bugs me is that Graham Stringer (my MP and a member of the Transport Committe) is always harping on about how terrible bus services are in teh area. And what does he do about it? Besides a few press articles to make himself look good, absolutely sweet FA.

 

Just btw (to get it off my chest) my complaints are a driver who started the bus moving when I was about to get off (with a walking stick at the time), and had the cheeck to tell me that I shouldn't have been on my mobile (even if I was (I wasn't), what's that got to do with the price of fish?), and another driver who deilberately failed to stop (he was smiling and sticking two fingers up at those waiting). One person stood out on the road and the driver just swerved onto the opposite side of the road to avoid stopping at the stop.

 

There a lot of elderly and infirm people where I live who relyon these bus services, but honest to god the service are total s**t.

 

there - rant over!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just written a letter of complaint over something similar to First Bus. I can totally understand your point of view.

 

Not fun being treated badly when all you want to do is get from A - B.

 

I saw a bus driver a while back do the same thing, pull off with someone half on the bus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just written a letter of complaint over something similar to First Bus. I can totally understand your point of view.

 

Not fun being treated badly when all you want to do is get from A - B.

 

I saw a bus driver a while back do the same thing, pull off with someone half on the bus.

 

I know that its easy to say in hindsight, but were there any witnesses to any of these events.

 

If the bus company are not prepared to instigate any formall disciplinary procedings against the drivers involved then it may be time to considerer talking to the police for the consideration of dangerous driving.

 

 

" There was an incident a while ago which involved an elderly person who was seriously injured, while alighting a bus, when the driver pulled away from the stop where the person involved had just got on the bus, and the driver pulled away, without giving the passenger involved time to sit down, as I belive this case is subject to the crown prosecution for consideration for dangerous driving......

 

it may be worthwhile pointing this out to the bus company involved and observing their change of policy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also if the company did investigate your complaint and ended up taking some form of action against the driver, be it dismissal or something else, then they probably wouldn't inform you that such action had been taken due to DPA restrictions.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right ok don't bite my head off but I am or rather wasa bus driver - I now drive coaches!!

 

I have to agree there is a lot of arrogant and nasty drivers out there and trust me they do get dealt with. All bus companies have disciplinary proceedures and the driversa invloved will have been pulled into an office with a manager and a trade union guy to answer to your complaint.

 

The driver will not have been shown your letter - that is private but he/she will have been told what the complaint involved and given the chance to explain it.

 

If found guilty - and there is no getting out of your complaint - there is no legal reason to fail to stop unless the either the stop does not have the service number on it, the service does not use that stop or more importantly any intending passengers fail to put their arm out to "hail" the bus. Legally if passengers at a stop do not hail the bus, the driver does not have to stop - unless the stop is a compulsary one ie a timing point.

 

However some drivers do this just for fun - and they are a disgrace to our industry and give all us good drivers a bad name.

 

If he was found guilty to get back on topic, he will if it was his first offence have been given either a verbal warnign to stay of file for 6 months or a written warning for 12 months. Managers do take passenger complaints seriously, even if you as part of the general public feel that they do not.

 

It is correct yes that the industry is suffering from a lack of drivers - mainly down to poor pay and working conditions - but that would not stop a driver from being disciplined.

 

The letter you received will be a standard template letter in most parts kind of like the ones we use here on CAG with some personal details added, but that does not mean your complaint wash "brushed under" the carpet!!!

 

Remember though not all of us are like that - but the vast majority of the time a lot of complaints are indeed unfounded and in a lot of those cases some are even blatant lies that can be proved by viewing onboard cctv. It is highly possible the drivers involved have been targeted by something like this in the past and it has soured their perception of the public and that is just the sort of person we do not need in our industry.

:eek:ABBEY

Data Protection Act request complied with within 40 Days and no £10 charge..

31/01/07 Prelim Letter sent with schedule of charges.

19/02/07 LBA Sent with schedule of charges

08/03/07 MCOL started

09/03/07 £160 GOGW payment into account

23/07/07 Court Date set for 10/10/07

02/08/07 CPR Part 18 Request Submitted

10/08/07 Stay requested by Abbey :mad:

20/08/07 Claim Stayed by District Judge :mad:

:eek:HSBC

02/02/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Letter sent

22/02/07 Statements received and again no £10 charge...."happy to provide at their cost"

26/02/07 Prelim Letter to be sent with schedule of charges.

12/03/07 LBA sent with schedule of charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and just to add another thing any company cannot just sack a driver cos they did that to you - that would be unfair dismissal - they have an obligation to correct his mistakes by sending him on appropriate training.

 

All big companies have courses such as Defensive Driving, Customer Care and Disabilty awareness - he would be sent on one of those first - which I also might add is now a legal requirement with all current licence holders having to do these course EVERY 3 years and have at least 30 hours training every 5 years, and all new drivers within a yea of gaining their PCV licence now also have to pass a Drivers Certificate of Professional Competence which will cover all these areas and also legal issues.

 

Only after he has received the appropriate training and he continues to behave in this manner and he has had the legal 3 point disciplinary proceedure - ie verbal warning, written, then final written can he then have his contract of employment terminated.

 

What he did unfortunately does not ammount to gross incompetence or negligence unless he has already had the training (or been disciplined for doing this before) and he is aware of his legal AND moral responsiblites.

 

Sorry but that is the law, and nothing can change that.

:eek:ABBEY

Data Protection Act request complied with within 40 Days and no £10 charge..

31/01/07 Prelim Letter sent with schedule of charges.

19/02/07 LBA Sent with schedule of charges

08/03/07 MCOL started

09/03/07 £160 GOGW payment into account

23/07/07 Court Date set for 10/10/07

02/08/07 CPR Part 18 Request Submitted

10/08/07 Stay requested by Abbey :mad:

20/08/07 Claim Stayed by District Judge :mad:

:eek:HSBC

02/02/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Letter sent

22/02/07 Statements received and again no £10 charge...."happy to provide at their cost"

26/02/07 Prelim Letter to be sent with schedule of charges.

12/03/07 LBA sent with schedule of charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also if the company did investigate your complaint and ended up taking some form of action against the driver, be it dismissal or something else, then they probably wouldn't inform you that such action had been taken due to Data Protection Act restrictions.

 

You are absolutely correct there. They very well may have sacked him but they will not ever divuldge that information to the public as it seriously undermines his/her ability to gain employment elsewhere.

:eek:ABBEY

Data Protection Act request complied with within 40 Days and no £10 charge..

31/01/07 Prelim Letter sent with schedule of charges.

19/02/07 LBA Sent with schedule of charges

08/03/07 MCOL started

09/03/07 £160 GOGW payment into account

23/07/07 Court Date set for 10/10/07

02/08/07 CPR Part 18 Request Submitted

10/08/07 Stay requested by Abbey :mad:

20/08/07 Claim Stayed by District Judge :mad:

:eek:HSBC

02/02/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Letter sent

22/02/07 Statements received and again no £10 charge...."happy to provide at their cost"

26/02/07 Prelim Letter to be sent with schedule of charges.

12/03/07 LBA sent with schedule of charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Well due to exactly the problem of not having any real means of complaining, a solution to the problem has been found. Have a read of the link below.

 

First Bus Complaints

 

1 - Contact us and give us the driver number on our website, we will submit the complaint under our driver watch scheme, where there is an easily searchable database where you can check by driver number other sins. First Bus will be able to do this too.

 

2 - Leave comments about subjects that are annoying you most about First Bus.

 

3 - Read the latest news on what has been going on with First Bus.

 

We also do campaigns about issues that are on the minds of first bus customers, so you can submit ideas to us too.

 

In order to make a change, we need to get together in big numbers. I have done this sort of thing before in different industries and it has worked. So please bookmark the link and keep coming back, and if you have something to say, say it, leave a comment.

 

Also we have a facebook group

 

Due to the popular use of Google, you can bet their are drivers and even executives reading. And if we make a big enough noise, changes will have to come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Well due to exactly the problem of not having any real means of complaining, a solution to the problem has been found. Have a read of the link below.

 

First Bus Complaints

 

1 - Contact us and give us the driver number on our website, we will submit the complaint under our driver watch scheme, where there is an easily searchable database where you can check by driver number other sins. First Bus will be able to do this too.

 

2 - Leave comments about subjects that are annoying you most about First Bus.

 

3 - Read the latest news on what has been going on with First Bus.

 

We also do campaigns about issues that are on the minds of first bus customers, so you can submit ideas to us too.

 

In order to make a change, we need to get together in big numbers. I have done this sort of thing before in different industries and it has worked. So please bookmark the link and keep coming back, and if you have something to say, say it, leave a comment.

 

Also we have a facebook group

 

Due to the popular use of Google, you can bet their are drivers and even executives reading. And if we make a big enough noise, changes will have to come.

 

So you're with F**ked group? Don't get caught reading the Bloodbus in the canteen lol

First in Glasgow have been after this guy after a blog he did and they still haven't caught him (he stayed anonymous). Still it gave us all a laugh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

I found First customer services very helpful in refunding ticket charges and postage when I complained about drivers being unwilling to accept Multibus tickets.

It took a few months for any instruction to filter down, before someones asks the drivers weren't foreign.

First are now having completion on the route I use from a national company whose fares are cheaper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you mean competition?

 

Down here (Brighton, that is) we have a particular ticket called an Explorer which is a council thing, which means you can use any bus from any company in the whole of Sussex for £7. That must be the equivalent of that Multibus ticket you mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I hate the buses they are horrible there was snow on the pavement last week cleared up now but ice on the pavement the buses refuse to come down our road but my daughter has a broken leg and has to walk now 40 mins a day the council won't even provide her with a taxi

 

Also a bus started driving when I was on and slammed me into a window then for saying to the busdriver why the he'll did you do that I was kicked off the bus like a criminal it's ridiculous how much thought they put to not picking up passagers but so little thought into their job

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hello and Welcome,

 

You will get an address from the 'contact us' on this 'link'...............

 

http://www.firstgroup.com/greater-manchester

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi All,

 

Has anyone had any success with Transportation Claims Ltd?

 

On 6th June I was clipped on my right arm by a First Bus whilst walking on the pavement.

Driver did not stop but it was a loud bang and pedestrians behind me came and checked I was OK.

 

 

To be honest I was more angry than hurt at the time as I had my wife and kids with me and had literally seconds before made my daughter move away from the kerb.

 

 

I phoned First bus customer services within 15 minutes of the incident to report it and although I was still extremely angry I accepted they would look into it and get back to me.

 

 

I gave them route number, exact location and time as it was an hourly service it would have been a simple process to determine the driver and bus concerned.

I received an email cofirming my complaint within minutes.

 

After hearing nothing for a week I called back and they said they could not discuss with me as was a matter of data protection for the driver, but I would hear from them shortly.

 

2 further days later I get a fairly bland letter stating my complaint had been passed to Transportation Claims Ltd and that no further contact with First would be acceptable on the matter and they would be in touch.

 

4th July, I called Transportation Claims Ltd quoting the claim ref from the bland letter.

The person I spoke to looked up the claim ref and said the matter was being investigated and they must be having trouble finding the exact bus or driver.

 

 

He then said he would send me the relevant claim forms to fill in and by the time I fill them in and return them the investigators should have finished the investigation.

 

I wasn't badly injured, just some bruising and a sore shoulder and elbow so wondering if this is really worth pursuing?

 

Thanks in advance fro any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are internal to first group buses

 

 

not an external claims company

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...