Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can anyone help vs Lloyds TSB **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6028 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, new to this posting business.

 

I have been reading and following this site since last November, great stuff with really useful tips, thank you.

 

Any way, just after some pointers really. My case with Lloyds has gone before the Distrcit Judge at Wellingborough County Court. I have to reply back, and I am seeking advice on how to word the letter back etc. I have copied down the following that was sent to me:-

 

It is ordered that:

 

1. The claim is allocated to the small Claims Track.

 

2. the Claimant shall by 01 august 2007 file and serve on the defendant a schedule setting out each charge of which the Claimant claims repayment, together with an explanation of the basis on which the Claimant claims repayment.

 

 

That is basically the crux of it for me, just have to reply within 3 weeks deadline. I have all the breakdown of charges etc, can anyone please help with the wording of the claim, just dont want to get it wrong with the Judge.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Matty :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you did not include your schedule of charges - also maybe that your POCs were incorrect does the Lloyds defence mention anything about the claim being 'too vague' and is it the standard 9 point defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The letter read as followed:-

 

Before A PROPER OFFICER sitting at Wellingborough County Court, Lothersdale House, West Villa Road, Wellingborough, Northants, NN8 4NF.

 

Upon the defendant failing to file a defence as stated in paragraph 5 of the order dated 06 June 2007

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

The defence is struck out in accordance with paragraph 6 of the above order.

 

Dated 11 October 2007

 

 

 

Next course of action anyone ?

 

Cheers and beers

 

Matty26276 :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

From memory you now have to ask for a judgment against Lloyds, then if they don't pay within 14 days you can apply for a warrant and get a bailiff to collect your money. I know there is a "how to" thread here somewhere but damned if I can find it at the moment.

 

I would think Lloyds solicitors have failed to submit whatever they were directed to send to the court so your almost there but not quite:)

 

They can still appeal against the judgment but they are now on very very thin ice :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

I was having a good look last night onnthe Lloyds forums. I'll be honest I am a bit worried now. It seems that altough Lloyds defence has been struck out, they can still seek a stay or even look to turn around the order.

 

What is my best route to take now;-

 

Do I simply sit and wait and hope for payout ?

 

Do I start a judgement against them and if so how ?

 

 

I know I may sound a bit dim, but there seems to be so many different routes this can go. What is the best time frame to do this. As I mentioned early in the post, the strike out was ordered on the 11th October.

 

Cheers and beers

 

Matty26276 :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget That Last Post

 

 

I Have Just Checked My Account Online And Seen A Deposit To My Account With My Case Number And Bc As The Reference

 

 

Another Sucess Against Lloyds Tsb

 

 

Thank You Cag And The Forum Users

 

 

Donation To Cag Will Follow Soon

 

 

 

:D:):D:):D:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...