Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what the latest data on school suspensions tells us about the UK education system and early intervention.View the full article
    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Chris v MINT (New Case)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I claimed a repayment of charges which came to £220 and have been offered £80. I have rejected this and sent the Letter Before Action which produced the same offer of £80. I am now about to start the Money Claim Online process. Can any of you tell me how they have got on at this stage and beyond? I would be very surprised if RBS would contest the case given the small amount.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

my claim is for considerably more but i recently filed MCOL - RBS acknowledged and asked for 28 days and have just submitted a defence (27th june ) - through their solicitors Cobbetts who are now asking for more info - on searching the site this is not uncommon but it is a bit scary!

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the Customer Services Dept which is:

 

Cards Customer Services

PO Box 6050

Southend on Sea

SS99 1WL

 

They replied reasonably quickly but from my experience so far (and that of others looking through this site) is that they initially offer to repay the difference between their old charges and the new £12.00 charge, so this will equate to an offer to pay back about one third of your claim. I rejected this offer and then sent the Letter Before Action which came back with the same offer. I am now about to submit a claim through MCOL. It would guess that you will automatically get the same first offer that I and others have had, but I have not seen any how MINT (RBoS) have reacted once a claim to the coursts has been submitted; any links would be appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit confused about what interest to add to my court claim. Could some one please advise??

 

-Initially I simply asked MINT for the charges to be repaid without any interest.

-Can I at this stage now add contractual interest and compound it (I was going to use 16.9% which others seem to have used)?

-The account was closed a couple of years ago so do I calculate up to the closure date or up to today?

-After calculating this, can I then also add the 8% statutory interest?

 

Your words of wisdom would be appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris

 

I've just sent off my prelim letter to Mint today.

 

Like you I'm going to add contractual interest (16.9%) but you don't do this until you go to court. I would say you claim up until today as they still haven't paid you the money back so it's only fair they are charged the interest until they finally refund you.

 

No you cannot charge the statutory 8% on top of that. It's either contractual or statutory.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im at the same stage, had one offer of about a third, sent LBA and then got the same offer, so doing MCOL next week as soon as im paid.

Abbey - Claiming £4,044.82:lol: offered £4,170 - accepted:) :) :) :)

 

Mint - Claiming £769.71:lol: offered £217 - declined

 

NatWest - Claiming £272

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck with it Chris, i know this point has passed, but as far as i was aware, regarding the interest, it was only bank accounts that you had to wait for Court before adding interest, you can ask for contractual interest from the beginning of a credit card claim :)

 

I might be wrong but i dont think i am and have claimed contractual interest from day one on all credit cards ive done :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I added contractual interest and with the court fee it has nearly doubled the amount of the claim. The claim has been acknowledged by RBoS and they have said that they intend to defend the claim. I can't imagine that they are going to send a solicitor out into the sticks to defend a claim for a couple of hundred quid.

 

What I have struggled to find on this site is examples of what MINT (RBoS) have done previously with smaller claims like this. Has anyone found any examples??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best place to look is the RBS successes forum, once there, click SEARCH THIS FORUM and search for MINT. Should be plenty of other claims in there ;)

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to follow on from Wed's point, I wasn't aware you had to wait until court to claim contractual on a bank account?

 

It's statutory interest that can only be applied at court stage - the 8%.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I am not 100% sure either way. From what I have read, I understand that you can only claim Statutory Interest (8%) at the court stage but that you can claim contractual interest when making the initial claim from the bank or credit provider but that you cannot claim both. With my claim against MINT I added intrerest at the prevailing rate which was 16.9% and compounded it from the date the charge was applied up until the month of the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's correct, the point I was making was that you can do this with bank accounts too.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nearly there, received a cheque which was meant to be in full settlement of charges plus interest and the court fee. Unfortunatley somebody at RBoS can't add up and it is £20 short so I will be asking for that as well before withdrawing the claim from the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

RBS responded straight away to the MCOL by indicating that they would defend the claim. I would imagine that this is an automatic response as it gives them more time to assess each case. A coupe of weeks later, RBS's offer letter to me (and also confirmaed during a conversation that I then had with the person handling the claim) stated that it was not economically viable to do anything other than pay it in full. The person handling the claim said that he would not even be checking my interest calculations because it was just easier and quicker to pay up than spend any more time over it (the whole claim was for less than £300).

 

They almost certainly have a monetary threshold or certain criteria where they will defend, make life difficult, use a solicitor or indeed go to court but my claim clearly fell below these levels.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...