Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wynne v RBS....court 07/09....help appreciated


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Hi all

 

Firstly thanks for taking the time to read our post!!

I am handling my partners bank charges claim against the RBS, and as the title suggests we have received a 'Notice of Allocation to the small claims track (hearing)' i.e a court date for 07th sept, prior to that all documents to which we intend to rely upon within court, need to be sent to court and the defendants solicitors by 16th July.

 

The details

 

Defendant: RBS

Defendant Solicitor: Cobbetts

Court Date: 07/09/2007

Court: St Helens county

bank charges: £1466 exc interest £2146 inc interest

 

Action so far

 

Standard letters initially ( statement request, LBA etc.....)

HMCS online

Cobbetts filed acknowledgement

Cobbetts filed defence

Cobbetts made 'request for further information'

We used template letter from CAG to decline request

We provided court/cobbetts allocation questionnaire (N149), breakdown of charges, and draft order for directions.

 

Current Status

 

As outlined above, court in september.....but this is where the questions start!!

 

In the last correspondance from court notifying us of the court date, no reference was made to the 'Order for directions'....so am i correct in assuming that this request was not granted, and therefore we need to take no action ourselves regards that document.

 

What documents/evidence to support claim do we need for court.

 

My partner is non too confident about the prospect of attending/speaking in court, is it possible for me to 'represent' her in some way on the day, or is it just going to be a case of me making sure she is extremely well prepared!!

 

Im not expecting anyone to 'spoon feed' me with this information, as i will be thoroughly researching the above issues using the resources on this site, BUT any sound advice, guidance, links to relevant documents etc.... or messages of support will be greatly appreciated, the easier, and less stressfull i can make the whole process the better!!

 

Again thanks for reading our post,and may we wish you all well

 

Marc and Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Marc

 

Have a look at the following thread it will give you an idea about what to include in your court bundle;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html

 

You should also read this thread;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/82148-got-court-date-important.html

 

Good luck!

 

FC

Barclaycard: SETTLED AFTER LBA

Barclays 1: AT COURT

Barclays 2: WITH FOS

Capital One: SETTLED AFTER N1

Egg: SETTLED AFTER LBA

HFC: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

Lloyds TSB: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - WITH Information Commissioners Office

RBS: AT COURT

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

 

before i update you on the wynne v rbs saga, a big thanks to FC for the links and guidance provided in the post above.

Anyhow, i now have the court bundle together and first thing tomorrow i will be sending copies to the CC and defendants solicitor, ive spent approx 6 hrs reading,printing, reading, clicking, clicking back, re-reading etc.....but im sure it will be wrth it!!

My big concern now is that the claim is my partners, but ive handled it from day one, (never expected it to go this far!!) and hence have slowly built up my knowledge/understanding of the relevant issues/procedures etc....whereas if it goes all the way to actually sitting down at court and presenting our case my partner hasnt had the benefit of the last 7 months research, and quite frankly she is terrified!!......so will have to work hard on preparing her and/or pray they settle before then!!

Either way we will be seeing this out to the end, and im sure we will be victorious!! (my churchillian moment!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...