Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBOS - court - help needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi was wondering if there is anyone out there who can help me. I have taken RBOS to court and have had what appears to be a standard letter back from Cobbetts requesting information under CPR 18 with regard to CPR rule27.2(3) also asking me to

"in particular please identify the regulations of THe unfair Terms in consumer Contract Regulations 1999 (the regulations) relied upon by the claimant in alleging that the contractual provision(s) referred to are unenforceable"

 

I have until 11th july to respond with the information

HELP!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who has given you until the 11th July to respond?

 

If it's Cobbetts go tell them to take a hike, any questions of this sort will be answered at the hearing.

 

Additionally if your claim is either for less than £5000 or has been allocated the small claims track then CPR18 does not apply, Cobbetts know this and yet they still keep trying it on.

 

If they have asked for any documentation that is missing then send it to them (along with a copy to the court) but any questions they ask that are of a legal nature then you aren't obliged to answer them at this point in time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cobbetts have given me to the 11th. The claim is for more than 5k which i submitted through MCOL. Some of the info they are asking for is easy - name account number etc plus list of charges and dates, they also want reason for the charge.

the other bit is if i am saying that the charge should not have been made explain why?

 

Really unsure and wish I'd accepted the offer (although it was recieved after I'd started the claim)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cobbetts can't make deadlines for you, only you or the court can do that.

 

At this stage they can't start making CPR18 demands either. Once your case has been allocated to the fast track/multi-track then they can start using disclosure rules. Even then they can't make interogative demands as your case is to prove to the court, not prove to Cobbetts that what you say is correct.

 

The letters they send out are designed to be intimidating to the lay person.

 

Ignore their questions and just supply them with the documentation they ask for. It's quite standard for claims issued via MCOL due to the lack of space and the inability to accompany your N1 with additional documentation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've read somewhere there is a template for replying to cobbetts (Martin3030?) i have the usual info - account and list of charges etc but don't have a clue about the other things they are asking for ie CPR 18 with regard to 27.3

shall i just send them the charges info and not mention the other?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've managed to find the letters there is a link to them in the nat west thread as they use the same solicitors -cobbetts (same standard letters it seems as well - well they are all one and the same after all!!!)

 

advice needed though as my claim is over 5k can i still assume it will go through small claims court? if not do i have to change the letter and what to? they refer to "CPR 18 alternatively with regard to CPR rule 27.2.(3)"

 

want to get this off asap so i wont fret about it

 

Ta

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've managed to find the letters there is a link to them in the nat west thread as they use the same solicitors -cobbetts (same standard letters it seems as well - well they are all one and the same after all!!!)

 

advice needed though as my claim is over 5k can i still assume it will go through small claims court?

 

Not necessarily, though you can ask for it to go through on the small claims track when your AQ comes along.

 

if not do i have to change the letter and what to? they refer to "CPR 18 alternatively with regard to CPR rule 27.2.(3)"

[color=red]27.2.(3)[/color]    The court of its own initiative may order a party to provide 
further information if it considers it appropriate to do so.

Here's a link to CPR18 part 27...

 

PART 27*-- THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK

 

want to get this off asap so i wont fret about it

 

Ta

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Nell

could someone help - there is a letter on the thread "loopholevrbs**Won** "(not sure how to insert the link) sorry which asks them (Cobbetts) for information regarding CPR 18 is it worth sending this as well.

 

this is the letter I am sending anyway :-

 

 

Claim xxxxx your client – Royal Bank of Scotland

I Acknowledge the receipt of the defence posted on behalf of Royal Bank of Scotland.

I am not prepared at this stage to answer the CPR Part 18 Request. I anticipate that the claim will be allocated to the small claims track and would not then expect to have to deal with a Part 18 request since these are specifically excluded under Part 27 unless the court specifically orders me to do so of its own initiative.

Furthermore I consider that the CPR part 18 request is intimidatory and I intend to bring the intimidation to the notice of the court.

However, for clarity, I confirm the charges I am claiming were applied to the following account:-

 

Account Name: xxx

Account number: xxxxx

Sort Code:xxx

Please also find enclosed a breakdown of all charges I am claiming, I have previously supplied these to your client on 8th April 2007 and 30th April 2007.

 

 

I can confirm I have filed the same with the court.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try sending this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/55874-letter-court-re-cpr18.html to the court - c.c. cobbetts. Just adapt as necessary to suit your own claim.

  • Haha 1

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it seems its true - the RBOS have no idea whats going on!!

 

Sent letter to cobbetts (CC the court) and letter to the court re cobbetts CPR 18 request (cc Cobbetts) on Thursday.

 

Friday recieved letter from court moving case from Northampton to my local court (they'd crossed out the bit about AQ being needed)

 

Saturday received letter from RBOS (Mark douthwaite) saying they were disappointed i'd not accepted their offer which they considered reasonable etc etc etc and that I could seek redress from the Ombusdman or the court!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it seems its true - the RBOS have no idea whats going on!!

 

Very true, RBS have still been adding charges to my account, although I've got a court date and I've rung them 3 times pointing this out. Each time they've said "your account is on hold" and each time they send me another threatening letter!!

Now, instead of ringing or writing to them I just go outside and talk to my front wall ........I get a more intelligent reply!!!:o

 

Good luck

 

canobeans

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...