Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Going back over 6 yrs, no info?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I wrote to the RBS asking for my statements going back past 6 years as they only initially provided the last 6 years.

I have had a letter back from RBS telling me that they hold no statements on my account going back 6 years. They say they don't have to keep them so they haven't.

This is an old account closed in 2003.

 

I'm not 100% convinced they are being honest, afterall its the RBS. Do you believe them? Is there anything else I can do?

 

Is it worth starting court action or am I just going to have to take them at their word that the statements are gone.

Thanks

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't believe them in the slightest they are telling lies ....I've got statements out of them going back to 19 Dec 1997 and I'm going to force them to produce them going back futher.Take a look at this letter that came with my statements.

Proof they are telling you lies

sparkie

Your Ref:

OurRef: RBS / 28694065 / Arch / CCT / JMK

Date: 18th June 2007

RBS

The Royal Bank of Scotland Croup

Credit Management Services Customer Care Team

Kendal Court Ironmasters Way Telford TF3 4DT

Direct Dial Number: 01952 - 206432

Facsimile Number: 01952-206531

Textphone: 01952-206570

 

I write further to our recent telephone conversations regarding the corresponding entries to the debits to your personal account numbered XXXXXXXX.

As discussed, I have been able to obtain copy statements for the business account numbered XXXXXXXXcovering the period from the start of 1998 through to mid-May 1998. I would draw your attention to the credits recorded on 31st March and 7th May 1998 - both for - which correspond to the withdrawals -from your personal account.

I am still trying to obtain further statements but, as you are aware from our conversations, there is an element of trial and error in the process of obtaining these as I cannot be certain of the precise date that the account was closed.

However, there does appear to be activity on the account beyond the date that we originally understood that the account had been closed and replaced with your personal account. This includes entries such as cheques and credits that could only have been instigated by you.

I will continue to try to obtain further statements and these will be forwarded to you if and when I receive them.

Yours sincerely

J.M.Kennedy

 

The Royal Bank of Scotland pic is registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

The Royal Bank of Scotland pic is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represents The Royal Bank of Scotland Marketing Group. The Bank sells life polic units in collective investment schemes and pension products and advises only on the Marketing Group's range of these products and on a With Profit Bond produced by Norwich Unic Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Sparkie

 

That's all well and good, and I'm already convinced they are talking crap about not having any statements older than 6 years, but how do I proceed? Is there some sort of proof they should have that the statements were destroyed? Can I force them to produce this? Are they legaly obliged to keep statements for a fixed period of time?

 

Sorry about all the questions, but I really want to stick it to 'em good!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No there is only a stipulation that they must keep for at least six years....but if anyone holds information for a period longer than six years the Data Protection Act states they must have a reason for doing so and ithey must give you a reason for keeping it also if they do, they must supply you with it because it is your information and you are entitled to it, that is why Banks allways say that they hold information for no longer than six years, so if they do and do keep it longer they are making negligent miss statements with the deliberate attempt to deceive and mislead.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just write and tell them to supply them ......as you can provide absolute proof ( from th RBOS themselves) that they DO keep statements longer than six years, and have provided them to other customers so why are they discriminating against you..... andif necessary prove it in court but the evidence will not be shown to them until the day of a court hearing as it is priviledge information, and does not belong to you...... but at a push you could use my evidence to the fact.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be sounding daft here but just because they have some peoples statements surely doesn't mean they have to have mine, especially since the account was closed a few years ago.

 

Debs (the wife)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should they keep some peoples statements and not others one of my accounts was supposed to have been closd in 1998, I got statements on that account, so again why keep some and not others

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...