Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS CC debt...County Court claim 3 years ago - still stayed - now an SD!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5863 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, can anyone provide assistance with this query.

 

RBS issued proceedings against me over 3 years ago in connection with a credt card debt,

 

the claim was for over £5,000.

I defended the action on a number of basis.

 

I heard nothing

 

.. Recently, Ive received correspondence from a DCA advising that the debt has been sold to them.

 

I telephoned the County Court and have been told that RBS were advised of the course of action they would need to take (following receipt of my defence)

if they wished to continue with the action.

They did not.

 

Can I apply to have the court proceedings struck out?

 

Can they sell a debt where they have issued proceedings and

, in view of the defence,

decided not to proceed?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

sound like the two are not related.

they lost the courtcase [as such]

so it just became a normal outstanding A/C, which they have now sold? on to a DCA. thats the way i read it.

 

time for a CCA request me thinks!

 

 

dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I defended the action on a number of basis.

 

What was the basis of your defence.

 

I assume the proceedings were dropped rather than a judgement was obtained.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re the defence,

 

I hold correspondence from the claimaint (RBS) providing investment advice.

 

.suggesting I hold my stocks and shares rather than sell and clear a large propertion of the debt at that time (2001).

 

In fact the shares (which they made no attempt to enquire about) fell in value and proved worthless.

 

I claimed contributory negligence.

 

RBS did not proceed with the case,

 

following submission of my defence,

but should i make an application to the court (if so which one and how) in order to have the matter terminated..

 

..at present I guess its still an open case which could be resurrected at any time.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some papers from Court which state that my defence has been filed and the claimant has 28 days to respond after which time judgement will be stayed.

 

Exact wording is

 

Where he wishes to proceed, the claimant must contact the court within 28 days after receiving a copy of your defence. After that period has elapsed, the claim will be stayed. The only action the claimant can then take will be to apply to a judge for an order lifting the stay

 

I would say that your situation is the same as mine.

Where that leaves you with regard to a DCA claim I dont know but it might be an idea to contact the court to determine if the claim is stayed and then send off a copy to the DCA.

 

If the original claimant gave up, I cannot see a DCA having any more luck.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

Ive contacted the Court as you suggested.

 

They have confirmed that the claim is stayed and further that the claimant would be barred from proceeding without paying a further fee.

 

They also said it would need to go before a district judge (another fee)

and that as they deal with the solicitors for the claimant repeatedly

(and that they are fully aware of the rules)

 

they believed the Judge would take a dim view of the delay in proceeding with the matter

and that there was no guarantee that he would allow the case to proceed.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like good news then :)

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have finally lost patience with this firm and have commenced legal action against them for unauthorised disclosure of my financial affairs.

 

I wont bore you with the history but is anyone able to give me some advise as to how I assess the level of damages i should claim,

 

what I should include in my claim (distress/anxiety/harrassment etc)

 

Can I claim for my time in answering endless letters and telephone calls?

 

Can i include a claim for penal damages?

 

any advice would be very helpful.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you might need to expand on your query so we can offer better advice for you. interesting use of the underline function by the way!

 

 

apologies, I couldnt find a way to turn it off....

 

I am commencing an action against 1st Credit for unlawful disclosure under 7th and 4th Data Protection Princlples

and a claim for damage and distress under 13.

 

My question is.

 

..what can I include in my claim for damages..

 

.my time for the endless correspondence I have received and made.

 

..the same with phone calls?

 

The anxiety and mental distress I have suffered?..

 

.can I include a claim for damages for harassment?

 

I just wnat to know what I can do to substantiate my claim for damages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Small claims procedure book sold on here has good advice on this.

 

However

 

Claiming Costs

 

You can only claim certain costs against your opponent if you win in the Small Claims Court. These are known as "Fixed Costs". They include any court fee you have paid, but not your solicitor's charges. You can claim your travel expenses and loss of earnings if these relate to your attendance at court.

You may also be able to claim travel expenses and Loss of Earnings of any of your Witnesses who have had to come to court to give evidence for you, the amount you can claim is restricted.

You may also be able to claim for any Experts Reports you have paid for to help your case, again the amount is restricted.

The court does have a discretion to award costs where a party has behaved unreasonably.

This includes:

Making unnecessary applications.

Causing a late adjournment of the hearing.

Failure to comply with directions or orders.

Refusing to negotiate.

Failure to comply with protocols. Mis-stating value of the claim so it is allocated to small claims track to avoid costs liabilities.

I'm not an expert so check everything I tell you, however click me scales if I've been useful.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

There is no freemasonry like the freemasonry of Golf

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry..im clearly not being sufficiently precise...

 

In an action against 1st Credit which is based on their negligence,

the claimant claims damages on the basis that the defendant owed the claimant a duty of care and that the defendant breached that duty.

 

Now...exactly what can the claim for damages contain?

 

Can it include a monetary claim in respect of my time taken up in investigating the matter and answering/reading copious correspondence

and in taking/making telephone calls.

 

.can it include a monetary claim for harrassment..

 

..can it include a monetary claim for distress and anxiety?

 

What elements can comprise a claim for damages against 1st Credit in this instance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry..im clearly not being sufficiently precise...

In an action against 1st Credit which is based on their negligence, the claimant claims damages on the basis that the defendant owed the claimant a duty of care and that the defendant breached that duty.

Now...exactly what can the claim for damages contain?

Can it include a monetary claim in respect of my time taken up in investigating the matter and answering/reading copious correspondence and in taking/making telephone calls..can it include a monetary claim for harrassment....can it include a monetary claim for distress and anxiety?

What elements can comprise a claim for damages against 1st Credit in this instance?

 

I'm not an expert but time & materials is not unreasonable to make in a claim

I'm not an expert so check everything I tell you, however click me scales if I've been useful.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

There is no freemasonry like the freemasonry of Golf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

In todays post ive received a statutory demand from a firm called Connaught Collections,

 

the alleged creditor being 1st Credit and

 

the original alleged creditor being RBS.

 

Im surprised to receive this for

 

in 2004 RBS issues procedings through the Northampton County Court which I defended and alleged contributory negligence on the part of RBS

(I hold dsmning correspondence from RBS in this regard).

 

The claim did not proceed and there is no judgment.

 

Also, details of the alleged debt do nto appear on my credit file.

 

In 2006, I received a letter from 1st Credit in connection with the alleged debt

and, after much correspondence,

asked for a copy of my credit agreement for which i paid the appropriate fee.

 

To this day, 1st Credit have not provided this document.

 

my question is what do I do now in connection with the statutory demand which has arrived this morning.

 

Can Connaught chase this alleged debt notwithstanding that it has already been to court

AND that 1st credit have not provided a copy of the credit agreement?

 

Does the fact that the alleged debt does not appear on my credot file have any bearing.

 

Advice please. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Statutory Demands are dangerous beasts and must be dealt with promptly.

A good place to start would be here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/112344-statutory-demands-posts-discussion.html?highlight=statutory+demand

 

You should apply to get it set aside within 18 days for one of the allowable reasons as, after 21 days they can apply for bankruptcy, even if no court action has been taken.

Their window of opportunity to do this lasts 4 months.

If you use the search facility on this site just put in 'statutory demand' and there are many threads on the subject.

 

Newborn

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received a Notice of Assignment from RBS notifying you that the account has been assigned to 1st Credit?

 

Have you received a Letter Before Action advising you the a Statutory Demand would be served?

 

What type of account is it e.g. credit card, loan, overdraft?

 

Are there any charges on the account?

 

The claim did not proceed and there is no judgment.
What were RBS's reasons for withdrawing the claim?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received notification of assignment from RBS to 1st Credit in 2006.

 

I received a letter from Connaught dated 31st March in which they indicated their intention to issue a stat demand.

This is the first I had heard of them.

 

The alleged debt is in respect of a credit card.

 

I cant tell if there are any charges to the account but there is a small difference between the amount claimed by RBS on the July 2004 claim form

and the stat demand.

 

Should I ask for copy statements?

 

How can 1st Credit/Connaught issue a stat demand given that a request for a copy of the credit agreement was made, and ignored, in 2006?

 

I thought all proceedings were put on hold if the alleged creditor could nto provide a copy of the agreement.

 

Indeed I thought 1st Credit had committed an offence given that the time frame for production had lapsed.

 

I defended the claim on the basis of RBS having contributed to its own losses and provided documentary evidence (correspondence signed by RBS staff) in support.

 

On this basis RBS did not proceed with the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I ask for copy statements?

 

Yes send a SAR to RBS. As it has been passed to 1st credit there will definitely be charges on the account, it's just a question of how much the charges are.
How can 1st Credit/Connaught issue a stat demand given that a request for a copy of the credit agreement was made, and ignored, in 2006? I thought all proceedings were put on hold if the alleged creditor could nto provide a copy of the agreement. Indeed I thought 1st Credit had committed an offence given that the time frame for production had lapsed.

They are counting on you being ignorant of your rights. DCA's often do things that they are not supposed to do.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in the 1st instance i sand a SAR to RBS,

 

should i also write to Connaught informing them of the lack of a reply to a credit agreement letter to 1st Credit,

 

the fact that this case has already been to Court and judgment was not obtained?

 

Is there any mechanism which prevents DCA or anyone acquiring a debt in trying to enforce of the matter has already gone to court and judgment not obtained?

 

Do I need to do anything with the Stat Demand at this stage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

mine was a very similar case to yours

 

I sent a cca request to Connaught Collections after they sent me a stat demand (on behalf of 1st credit) and they immediately packed their bags and left the scene

 

1st credit now have it back and they have tried to send it to a couple of other dca's but i just keep bouncing it back to 1st credit

 

i raised formal complaint againt 1st credit some time ago and it has all been quiet since

 

watch out for connaught dont call them - they are allegedly :D liars, crooks and thiefs - just cca them sit back and demand withdrawal of stat demand - no judge will allow bankruptcy against such a seriously disputed debt of which they cannot prove is theirs :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, in the 1st instance i sand a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to RBS

Yes. Send it recorded delivery to:

The Royal Bank of Scotland

Data Protection Team

36 St Andrews Square

Edinburgh

EH2 2YB

should i also write to Connaught informing them of the lack of a reply to a credit agreement letter to 1st Credit
I wouldn't bother. Connaught and 1st Credit go hand in glove.
Is there any mechanism which prevents DCA or anyone acquiring a debt in trying to enforce of the matter has already gone to court and judgment not obtained?

Was the case dropped? If so no judgement was made in anyones favour.
Do I need to do anything with the Stat Demand at this stage?
Not just yet. Send the SAR first and then we'll write the set aside.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...